Psychometric and rationalization accounts of the religion-forgiveness discrepancy

Jo Ann Tsang, Michael McCullough, William T. Hoyt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

World events and psychological research often fail to support a relationship between religion and forgiveness. We suggest that the gap between general religious support of forgiveness and actual forgiveness by religious individuals (the religion-forgiveness discrepancy) described by McCullough and Worthington (1999) may be partly due to methodological shortcomings. We present three studies with 452 undergraduate participants to illustrate how psychometric weaknesses can obscure the relationship between religiousness and transgression-specific forgiveness. We also propose a rationalization explanation that describes how religion might justify unforgiveness. We present a pilot study of 38 undergraduate participants that demonstrates correlations between retributive and compassionate religious beliefs, and transgression-specific forgiveness. We discuss future research directions addressing the religion-forgiveness discrepancy on psychometric and theoretical levels.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)785-805
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Social Issues
Volume61
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2005

Fingerprint

rationalization
psychometrics
Religion
religious behavior
event

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Psychometric and rationalization accounts of the religion-forgiveness discrepancy. / Tsang, Jo Ann; McCullough, Michael; Hoyt, William T.

In: Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 61, No. 4, 01.12.2005, p. 785-805.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ec5cc808051d41b3ab2bed0c89f9b8db,
title = "Psychometric and rationalization accounts of the religion-forgiveness discrepancy",
abstract = "World events and psychological research often fail to support a relationship between religion and forgiveness. We suggest that the gap between general religious support of forgiveness and actual forgiveness by religious individuals (the religion-forgiveness discrepancy) described by McCullough and Worthington (1999) may be partly due to methodological shortcomings. We present three studies with 452 undergraduate participants to illustrate how psychometric weaknesses can obscure the relationship between religiousness and transgression-specific forgiveness. We also propose a rationalization explanation that describes how religion might justify unforgiveness. We present a pilot study of 38 undergraduate participants that demonstrates correlations between retributive and compassionate religious beliefs, and transgression-specific forgiveness. We discuss future research directions addressing the religion-forgiveness discrepancy on psychometric and theoretical levels.",
author = "Tsang, {Jo Ann} and Michael McCullough and Hoyt, {William T.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00432.x",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "785--805",
journal = "Journal of Social Issues",
issn = "0022-4537",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric and rationalization accounts of the religion-forgiveness discrepancy

AU - Tsang, Jo Ann

AU - McCullough, Michael

AU - Hoyt, William T.

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - World events and psychological research often fail to support a relationship between religion and forgiveness. We suggest that the gap between general religious support of forgiveness and actual forgiveness by religious individuals (the religion-forgiveness discrepancy) described by McCullough and Worthington (1999) may be partly due to methodological shortcomings. We present three studies with 452 undergraduate participants to illustrate how psychometric weaknesses can obscure the relationship between religiousness and transgression-specific forgiveness. We also propose a rationalization explanation that describes how religion might justify unforgiveness. We present a pilot study of 38 undergraduate participants that demonstrates correlations between retributive and compassionate religious beliefs, and transgression-specific forgiveness. We discuss future research directions addressing the religion-forgiveness discrepancy on psychometric and theoretical levels.

AB - World events and psychological research often fail to support a relationship between religion and forgiveness. We suggest that the gap between general religious support of forgiveness and actual forgiveness by religious individuals (the religion-forgiveness discrepancy) described by McCullough and Worthington (1999) may be partly due to methodological shortcomings. We present three studies with 452 undergraduate participants to illustrate how psychometric weaknesses can obscure the relationship between religiousness and transgression-specific forgiveness. We also propose a rationalization explanation that describes how religion might justify unforgiveness. We present a pilot study of 38 undergraduate participants that demonstrates correlations between retributive and compassionate religious beliefs, and transgression-specific forgiveness. We discuss future research directions addressing the religion-forgiveness discrepancy on psychometric and theoretical levels.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747070780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747070780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00432.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00432.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33747070780

VL - 61

SP - 785

EP - 805

JO - Journal of Social Issues

JF - Journal of Social Issues

SN - 0022-4537

IS - 4

ER -