Protein electrophoresis of psittacine plasma

Carolyn Cray, Marilyn Rodriguez, Julia Zaias

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although protein electrophoresis (EPH) has been widely applied in human and veterinary medicine, it has only recently been implemented in the analysis of avian samples. Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the application of protein EPH to the analysis of psittacine plasma samples. Our goals were to describe protein fraction mobility, establish reference intervals for some common species, determine the coefficient of variation (CV) of the chosen method, and examine the effects of sample handling and sample condition. Methods: Heparinized plasma samples from several common psittacine species (minimum sample size 50 each) were examined using the Beckman Paragon system and SPEP-II gels. Total protein was measured by refractometry. Reference intervals (95%) were calculated by the rank methods. Results: Fraction migration patterns were found to vary among common psittacine species. Day-to-day CV for the EPH fractions ranged from 2.2% to 10.5%; within-run CV ranged from 4.8% to 10.8%; and total CV ranged from 3.2% to 14.8%. The highest CV was noted for the poorly defined α-globulin fraction. Prolonged refrigeration, repeated freeze-thawing, hemolysis, and lipemia altered the results. Conclusions: Protein fractions from psittacine species were variable in terms of migration pattern and protein concentration, which necessitates the use of species-specific reference intervals. Avian protein electrophoretic patterns and values should be interpreted based on knowledge of the CV associated with the technique as well as on the effects of sample handling and condition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-72
Number of pages9
JournalVeterinary Clinical Pathology
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2007

Fingerprint

Psittaciformes
Electrophoresis
electrophoresis
Plasmas
Proteins
proteins
sampling
Veterinary medicine
Avian Proteins
Refractometry
Refrigeration
Thawing
Veterinary Medicine
Globulins
Hemolysis
Hyperlipidemias
Sample Size
hemolysis
hyperlipidemia
refrigeration

Keywords

  • A/G ratio
  • Albumin
  • Avian
  • Globulin
  • Plasma proteins
  • Protein electrophoresis
  • Psittacine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Protein electrophoresis of psittacine plasma. / Cray, Carolyn; Rodriguez, Marilyn; Zaias, Julia.

In: Veterinary Clinical Pathology, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.03.2007, p. 64-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{76da7f40f632427f84252a9f8eed087c,
title = "Protein electrophoresis of psittacine plasma",
abstract = "Background: Although protein electrophoresis (EPH) has been widely applied in human and veterinary medicine, it has only recently been implemented in the analysis of avian samples. Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the application of protein EPH to the analysis of psittacine plasma samples. Our goals were to describe protein fraction mobility, establish reference intervals for some common species, determine the coefficient of variation (CV) of the chosen method, and examine the effects of sample handling and sample condition. Methods: Heparinized plasma samples from several common psittacine species (minimum sample size 50 each) were examined using the Beckman Paragon system and SPEP-II gels. Total protein was measured by refractometry. Reference intervals (95{\%}) were calculated by the rank methods. Results: Fraction migration patterns were found to vary among common psittacine species. Day-to-day CV for the EPH fractions ranged from 2.2{\%} to 10.5{\%}; within-run CV ranged from 4.8{\%} to 10.8{\%}; and total CV ranged from 3.2{\%} to 14.8{\%}. The highest CV was noted for the poorly defined α-globulin fraction. Prolonged refrigeration, repeated freeze-thawing, hemolysis, and lipemia altered the results. Conclusions: Protein fractions from psittacine species were variable in terms of migration pattern and protein concentration, which necessitates the use of species-specific reference intervals. Avian protein electrophoretic patterns and values should be interpreted based on knowledge of the CV associated with the technique as well as on the effects of sample handling and condition.",
keywords = "A/G ratio, Albumin, Avian, Globulin, Plasma proteins, Protein electrophoresis, Psittacine",
author = "Carolyn Cray and Marilyn Rodriguez and Julia Zaias",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1939-165X.2007.tb00184.x",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "64--72",
journal = "Veterinary Clinical Pathology",
issn = "0275-6382",
publisher = "American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protein electrophoresis of psittacine plasma

AU - Cray, Carolyn

AU - Rodriguez, Marilyn

AU - Zaias, Julia

PY - 2007/3/1

Y1 - 2007/3/1

N2 - Background: Although protein electrophoresis (EPH) has been widely applied in human and veterinary medicine, it has only recently been implemented in the analysis of avian samples. Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the application of protein EPH to the analysis of psittacine plasma samples. Our goals were to describe protein fraction mobility, establish reference intervals for some common species, determine the coefficient of variation (CV) of the chosen method, and examine the effects of sample handling and sample condition. Methods: Heparinized plasma samples from several common psittacine species (minimum sample size 50 each) were examined using the Beckman Paragon system and SPEP-II gels. Total protein was measured by refractometry. Reference intervals (95%) were calculated by the rank methods. Results: Fraction migration patterns were found to vary among common psittacine species. Day-to-day CV for the EPH fractions ranged from 2.2% to 10.5%; within-run CV ranged from 4.8% to 10.8%; and total CV ranged from 3.2% to 14.8%. The highest CV was noted for the poorly defined α-globulin fraction. Prolonged refrigeration, repeated freeze-thawing, hemolysis, and lipemia altered the results. Conclusions: Protein fractions from psittacine species were variable in terms of migration pattern and protein concentration, which necessitates the use of species-specific reference intervals. Avian protein electrophoretic patterns and values should be interpreted based on knowledge of the CV associated with the technique as well as on the effects of sample handling and condition.

AB - Background: Although protein electrophoresis (EPH) has been widely applied in human and veterinary medicine, it has only recently been implemented in the analysis of avian samples. Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the application of protein EPH to the analysis of psittacine plasma samples. Our goals were to describe protein fraction mobility, establish reference intervals for some common species, determine the coefficient of variation (CV) of the chosen method, and examine the effects of sample handling and sample condition. Methods: Heparinized plasma samples from several common psittacine species (minimum sample size 50 each) were examined using the Beckman Paragon system and SPEP-II gels. Total protein was measured by refractometry. Reference intervals (95%) were calculated by the rank methods. Results: Fraction migration patterns were found to vary among common psittacine species. Day-to-day CV for the EPH fractions ranged from 2.2% to 10.5%; within-run CV ranged from 4.8% to 10.8%; and total CV ranged from 3.2% to 14.8%. The highest CV was noted for the poorly defined α-globulin fraction. Prolonged refrigeration, repeated freeze-thawing, hemolysis, and lipemia altered the results. Conclusions: Protein fractions from psittacine species were variable in terms of migration pattern and protein concentration, which necessitates the use of species-specific reference intervals. Avian protein electrophoretic patterns and values should be interpreted based on knowledge of the CV associated with the technique as well as on the effects of sample handling and condition.

KW - A/G ratio

KW - Albumin

KW - Avian

KW - Globulin

KW - Plasma proteins

KW - Protein electrophoresis

KW - Psittacine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34047262528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34047262528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2007.tb00184.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2007.tb00184.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 17311197

AN - SCOPUS:34047262528

VL - 36

SP - 64

EP - 72

JO - Veterinary Clinical Pathology

JF - Veterinary Clinical Pathology

SN - 0275-6382

IS - 1

ER -