Protection by natural blackwater against disturbances in ion fluxes caused by low pH exposure in freshwater stingrays endemic to the Rio Negro

Chris M. Wood, Aline Y O Matsuo, Rod W. Wilson, R. J. Gonzalez, Marjorie L. Patrick, Richard C. Playle, Adalberto Luis Val

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Stenohaline freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon spp.) are endemic to the very dilute (Na+, Cl-, Ca2+ ≤ 30 μmol L-1), often acidic blackwaters of the Rio Negro despite gill Na+ and Cl- transport characteristics that appear unfavorable (high Km, low Jmax). We evaluated the possible protective role of blackwater itself, which is rich in dissolved organic carbon (DOC), as well as the importance of Ca2+ in allowing this tolerance of dilute, acidic conditions. Responses of stingrays in natural blackwater (DOC = 8.4 mg L-1) were compared with those in a natural reference water with similar ion levels but low DOC (0.6 mg L-1). Comparing these two water types, we found that differences in Na+ and Cl- unidirectional fluxes (JinX, JoutX; measured with radiotracers) and net fluxes (JnetX), influx and outflux kinetic relationships, and net ammonia excretion (JAmm) were generally small at pH 6.3, though the balance points where Jin = Jout shifted from >300 μmol L-1 in reference water (low DOC) to about 100 μmol L-1 in blackwater (high DOC). In reference water, both JinNa and JinCl were inhibited >90%, both JoutNa and JoutCl more than doubled, and JAmm did not change at pH 4.0. In blackwater, the inhibition of influxes was attenuated, the increases in outflux did not occur, and JAmm increased by 60% at pH 4.0. Addition of 100 μmol L-1 Ca2+ to reference water prevented the increases in JoutNa and JoutCl and allowed JAmm to increase at pH 4.0, which demonstrates that the gills are sensitive to Ca2+. However, addition of Ca2+ to blackwater had no effect on the responses to pH 4.0. Addition of commercial humic acid to reference water did not duplicate the effects of natural Rio Negro blackwater at the same DOC level; instead, it greatly exacerbated the increases in JoutNa and JoutCl at low pH and prevented any protective influence of added Ca2+. Thus, blackwater DOC appears to be very different from commercial humic acid. Biogeochemical modeling indicated that blackwater DOC prevents Ca2+ binding, but not H+ binding, to the gills and that the protective effects of blackwater cannot be attributed to its higher buffer capacity or its elevated Al or Fe levels. Natural DOC may act directly at the gills at low pH to exert a protective effect and, when doing so, may override any protective action of Ca2+ that might otherwise occur.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-27
Number of pages16
JournalPhysiological and Biochemical Zoology
Volume76
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Myliobatiformes
Organic carbon
dissolved organic carbon
Fresh Water
Carbon
Ions
ions
Fluxes
calcium
Water
gills
Humic Substances
water
humic acids
protective effect
Ammonia
Buffers
ammonia
buffers
excretion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Protection by natural blackwater against disturbances in ion fluxes caused by low pH exposure in freshwater stingrays endemic to the Rio Negro. / Wood, Chris M.; Matsuo, Aline Y O; Wilson, Rod W.; Gonzalez, R. J.; Patrick, Marjorie L.; Playle, Richard C.; Val, Adalberto Luis.

In: Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, Vol. 76, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 12-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wood, Chris M. ; Matsuo, Aline Y O ; Wilson, Rod W. ; Gonzalez, R. J. ; Patrick, Marjorie L. ; Playle, Richard C. ; Val, Adalberto Luis. / Protection by natural blackwater against disturbances in ion fluxes caused by low pH exposure in freshwater stingrays endemic to the Rio Negro. In: Physiological and Biochemical Zoology. 2003 ; Vol. 76, No. 1. pp. 12-27.
@article{7d4ab4cec5e34f23b3102ae0aab1e18e,
title = "Protection by natural blackwater against disturbances in ion fluxes caused by low pH exposure in freshwater stingrays endemic to the Rio Negro",
abstract = "Stenohaline freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon spp.) are endemic to the very dilute (Na+, Cl-, Ca2+ ≤ 30 μmol L-1), often acidic blackwaters of the Rio Negro despite gill Na+ and Cl- transport characteristics that appear unfavorable (high Km, low Jmax). We evaluated the possible protective role of blackwater itself, which is rich in dissolved organic carbon (DOC), as well as the importance of Ca2+ in allowing this tolerance of dilute, acidic conditions. Responses of stingrays in natural blackwater (DOC = 8.4 mg L-1) were compared with those in a natural reference water with similar ion levels but low DOC (0.6 mg L-1). Comparing these two water types, we found that differences in Na+ and Cl- unidirectional fluxes (JinX, JoutX; measured with radiotracers) and net fluxes (JnetX), influx and outflux kinetic relationships, and net ammonia excretion (JAmm) were generally small at pH 6.3, though the balance points where Jin = Jout shifted from >300 μmol L-1 in reference water (low DOC) to about 100 μmol L-1 in blackwater (high DOC). In reference water, both JinNa and JinCl were inhibited >90{\%}, both JoutNa and JoutCl more than doubled, and JAmm did not change at pH 4.0. In blackwater, the inhibition of influxes was attenuated, the increases in outflux did not occur, and JAmm increased by 60{\%} at pH 4.0. Addition of 100 μmol L-1 Ca2+ to reference water prevented the increases in JoutNa and JoutCl and allowed JAmm to increase at pH 4.0, which demonstrates that the gills are sensitive to Ca2+. However, addition of Ca2+ to blackwater had no effect on the responses to pH 4.0. Addition of commercial humic acid to reference water did not duplicate the effects of natural Rio Negro blackwater at the same DOC level; instead, it greatly exacerbated the increases in JoutNa and JoutCl at low pH and prevented any protective influence of added Ca2+. Thus, blackwater DOC appears to be very different from commercial humic acid. Biogeochemical modeling indicated that blackwater DOC prevents Ca2+ binding, but not H+ binding, to the gills and that the protective effects of blackwater cannot be attributed to its higher buffer capacity or its elevated Al or Fe levels. Natural DOC may act directly at the gills at low pH to exert a protective effect and, when doing so, may override any protective action of Ca2+ that might otherwise occur.",
author = "Wood, {Chris M.} and Matsuo, {Aline Y O} and Wilson, {Rod W.} and Gonzalez, {R. J.} and Patrick, {Marjorie L.} and Playle, {Richard C.} and Val, {Adalberto Luis}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/367946",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "12--27",
journal = "Physiological and Biochemical Zoology",
issn = "1522-2152",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protection by natural blackwater against disturbances in ion fluxes caused by low pH exposure in freshwater stingrays endemic to the Rio Negro

AU - Wood, Chris M.

AU - Matsuo, Aline Y O

AU - Wilson, Rod W.

AU - Gonzalez, R. J.

AU - Patrick, Marjorie L.

AU - Playle, Richard C.

AU - Val, Adalberto Luis

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Stenohaline freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon spp.) are endemic to the very dilute (Na+, Cl-, Ca2+ ≤ 30 μmol L-1), often acidic blackwaters of the Rio Negro despite gill Na+ and Cl- transport characteristics that appear unfavorable (high Km, low Jmax). We evaluated the possible protective role of blackwater itself, which is rich in dissolved organic carbon (DOC), as well as the importance of Ca2+ in allowing this tolerance of dilute, acidic conditions. Responses of stingrays in natural blackwater (DOC = 8.4 mg L-1) were compared with those in a natural reference water with similar ion levels but low DOC (0.6 mg L-1). Comparing these two water types, we found that differences in Na+ and Cl- unidirectional fluxes (JinX, JoutX; measured with radiotracers) and net fluxes (JnetX), influx and outflux kinetic relationships, and net ammonia excretion (JAmm) were generally small at pH 6.3, though the balance points where Jin = Jout shifted from >300 μmol L-1 in reference water (low DOC) to about 100 μmol L-1 in blackwater (high DOC). In reference water, both JinNa and JinCl were inhibited >90%, both JoutNa and JoutCl more than doubled, and JAmm did not change at pH 4.0. In blackwater, the inhibition of influxes was attenuated, the increases in outflux did not occur, and JAmm increased by 60% at pH 4.0. Addition of 100 μmol L-1 Ca2+ to reference water prevented the increases in JoutNa and JoutCl and allowed JAmm to increase at pH 4.0, which demonstrates that the gills are sensitive to Ca2+. However, addition of Ca2+ to blackwater had no effect on the responses to pH 4.0. Addition of commercial humic acid to reference water did not duplicate the effects of natural Rio Negro blackwater at the same DOC level; instead, it greatly exacerbated the increases in JoutNa and JoutCl at low pH and prevented any protective influence of added Ca2+. Thus, blackwater DOC appears to be very different from commercial humic acid. Biogeochemical modeling indicated that blackwater DOC prevents Ca2+ binding, but not H+ binding, to the gills and that the protective effects of blackwater cannot be attributed to its higher buffer capacity or its elevated Al or Fe levels. Natural DOC may act directly at the gills at low pH to exert a protective effect and, when doing so, may override any protective action of Ca2+ that might otherwise occur.

AB - Stenohaline freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygon spp.) are endemic to the very dilute (Na+, Cl-, Ca2+ ≤ 30 μmol L-1), often acidic blackwaters of the Rio Negro despite gill Na+ and Cl- transport characteristics that appear unfavorable (high Km, low Jmax). We evaluated the possible protective role of blackwater itself, which is rich in dissolved organic carbon (DOC), as well as the importance of Ca2+ in allowing this tolerance of dilute, acidic conditions. Responses of stingrays in natural blackwater (DOC = 8.4 mg L-1) were compared with those in a natural reference water with similar ion levels but low DOC (0.6 mg L-1). Comparing these two water types, we found that differences in Na+ and Cl- unidirectional fluxes (JinX, JoutX; measured with radiotracers) and net fluxes (JnetX), influx and outflux kinetic relationships, and net ammonia excretion (JAmm) were generally small at pH 6.3, though the balance points where Jin = Jout shifted from >300 μmol L-1 in reference water (low DOC) to about 100 μmol L-1 in blackwater (high DOC). In reference water, both JinNa and JinCl were inhibited >90%, both JoutNa and JoutCl more than doubled, and JAmm did not change at pH 4.0. In blackwater, the inhibition of influxes was attenuated, the increases in outflux did not occur, and JAmm increased by 60% at pH 4.0. Addition of 100 μmol L-1 Ca2+ to reference water prevented the increases in JoutNa and JoutCl and allowed JAmm to increase at pH 4.0, which demonstrates that the gills are sensitive to Ca2+. However, addition of Ca2+ to blackwater had no effect on the responses to pH 4.0. Addition of commercial humic acid to reference water did not duplicate the effects of natural Rio Negro blackwater at the same DOC level; instead, it greatly exacerbated the increases in JoutNa and JoutCl at low pH and prevented any protective influence of added Ca2+. Thus, blackwater DOC appears to be very different from commercial humic acid. Biogeochemical modeling indicated that blackwater DOC prevents Ca2+ binding, but not H+ binding, to the gills and that the protective effects of blackwater cannot be attributed to its higher buffer capacity or its elevated Al or Fe levels. Natural DOC may act directly at the gills at low pH to exert a protective effect and, when doing so, may override any protective action of Ca2+ that might otherwise occur.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038069122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038069122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/367946

DO - 10.1086/367946

M3 - Article

C2 - 12695983

AN - SCOPUS:0038069122

VL - 76

SP - 12

EP - 27

JO - Physiological and Biochemical Zoology

JF - Physiological and Biochemical Zoology

SN - 1522-2152

IS - 1

ER -