Prospective randomized comparison of the safety, efficacy, and cosmetic outcome associated with mini-transverse and mini-longitudinal radical prostatectomy incisions

Bruce Kava, Rajinikanth Ayyathurai, Cynthia Soloway, Miguel Suarez, Prashanth Kanagarajah, Manoharan Murugesan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aims: Open radical retropubic prostatectomy (ORP) has traditionally been performed through a lower midline incision. Prior efforts to reduce pain and expedite recovery include a variety of alterations in length and the orientation of the incision. The aim of our study is to compare the safety, efficacy, and cosmetic outcomes associated with transverse and longitudinal mini-radical prostatectomy incisions. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing ORP at a single institution were studied. Patients were randomized to receive either a modified transverse or longitudinal incision. In all patients, the length of the incision was 7cm. The following parameters were compared between the two groups: Perioperative blood loss, duration of surgery, technical factors, pain and analgesic requirements, length of hospital stay (LOS), and pathological stage. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used to compare the cosmetic aspects associated with the incisions. Results: Fifty-six patients underwent a transverse (n=27) and longitudinal (n=29) mini-incision ORP. No significant differences were noted in the perioperative parameters that were compared (P>0.116). None of the patients required blood transfusion, there were no wound complications. Perioperative pain and analgesic requirements were not significantly different among the two study arms (P>0.433). The POSAS indicated no significant difference in cosmesis scores with both incisions (P>0.09). Conclusions: Seven-centimeter transverse and longitudinal mini-incisions offer alternatives to the standard ORP incision, and to minimally invasive approaches. Both incisions are safe, associated with little postoperative pain, and a short postoperative LOS. Both incisions provide highly satisfactory cosmesis for the patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)345-349
Number of pages5
JournalIndian Journal of Urology
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

Keywords

  • Cosmesis
  • localized prostate cancer
  • prostate cancer treatment
  • radical prostatectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective randomized comparison of the safety, efficacy, and cosmetic outcome associated with mini-transverse and mini-longitudinal radical prostatectomy incisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this