Propaganda and crony capitalism: Partisan bias in Mexican television news

Sallie Hughes, Chappell Lawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The relationship between media ownership and partisan bias has been an important source of controversy in emerging democracies. Systematic tests of the effects of ownership, however, remain relatively rare. Using data from content analysis of ninety-three television news programs, as well as more detailed examination of six provincial television stations, we assess the extent of bias exhibited by different types of broadcasters during Mexico's 2000 presidential campaign. We find that privately owned television stations were generally more balanced than public broadcasters, who typically followed propagandistic models of coverage. At the same time, private ownership often entailed collusive arrangements between broadcasters and politicians, based on the prospect of future business concessions (i.e., "crony capitalism"). We conclude that changes in ownership patterns are unlikely to eradicate partisan bias, and we discuss other institutional remedies aimed at insulating both private and state-run media from political manipulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-105
Number of pages25
JournalLatin American Research Review
Volume39
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2004

Fingerprint

broadcaster
television
capitalism
propaganda
ownership
capitalist society
news
trend
democracy
concession
remedies
manipulation
politician
content analysis
Mexico
campaign
coverage
Partisan
Ownership
Television News

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Propaganda and crony capitalism : Partisan bias in Mexican television news. / Hughes, Sallie; Lawson, Chappell.

In: Latin American Research Review, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2004, p. 81-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{88a69f44a18b43af8b85a42f8ef9c682,
title = "Propaganda and crony capitalism: Partisan bias in Mexican television news",
abstract = "The relationship between media ownership and partisan bias has been an important source of controversy in emerging democracies. Systematic tests of the effects of ownership, however, remain relatively rare. Using data from content analysis of ninety-three television news programs, as well as more detailed examination of six provincial television stations, we assess the extent of bias exhibited by different types of broadcasters during Mexico's 2000 presidential campaign. We find that privately owned television stations were generally more balanced than public broadcasters, who typically followed propagandistic models of coverage. At the same time, private ownership often entailed collusive arrangements between broadcasters and politicians, based on the prospect of future business concessions (i.e., {"}crony capitalism{"}). We conclude that changes in ownership patterns are unlikely to eradicate partisan bias, and we discuss other institutional remedies aimed at insulating both private and state-run media from political manipulation.",
author = "Sallie Hughes and Chappell Lawson",
year = "2004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "81--105",
journal = "Latin American Research Review",
issn = "0023-8791",
publisher = "Latin American Studies Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Propaganda and crony capitalism

T2 - Partisan bias in Mexican television news

AU - Hughes, Sallie

AU - Lawson, Chappell

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - The relationship between media ownership and partisan bias has been an important source of controversy in emerging democracies. Systematic tests of the effects of ownership, however, remain relatively rare. Using data from content analysis of ninety-three television news programs, as well as more detailed examination of six provincial television stations, we assess the extent of bias exhibited by different types of broadcasters during Mexico's 2000 presidential campaign. We find that privately owned television stations were generally more balanced than public broadcasters, who typically followed propagandistic models of coverage. At the same time, private ownership often entailed collusive arrangements between broadcasters and politicians, based on the prospect of future business concessions (i.e., "crony capitalism"). We conclude that changes in ownership patterns are unlikely to eradicate partisan bias, and we discuss other institutional remedies aimed at insulating both private and state-run media from political manipulation.

AB - The relationship between media ownership and partisan bias has been an important source of controversy in emerging democracies. Systematic tests of the effects of ownership, however, remain relatively rare. Using data from content analysis of ninety-three television news programs, as well as more detailed examination of six provincial television stations, we assess the extent of bias exhibited by different types of broadcasters during Mexico's 2000 presidential campaign. We find that privately owned television stations were generally more balanced than public broadcasters, who typically followed propagandistic models of coverage. At the same time, private ownership often entailed collusive arrangements between broadcasters and politicians, based on the prospect of future business concessions (i.e., "crony capitalism"). We conclude that changes in ownership patterns are unlikely to eradicate partisan bias, and we discuss other institutional remedies aimed at insulating both private and state-run media from political manipulation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7444224003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7444224003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:7444224003

VL - 39

SP - 81

EP - 105

JO - Latin American Research Review

JF - Latin American Research Review

SN - 0023-8791

IS - 3

ER -