Prognostic implications of partial sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens: Comparison of 3 methods

Viacheslav Iremashvili, Soum D. Lokeshwar, Merce Jorda, Liset Pelaez, Mark S. Soloway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We analyzed the prognostic implications of positive margins and extraprostatic extension missed by different methods of partially sampling prostatectomy specimens. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 1,499 patients treated with radical prostatectomy. All specimens were processed uniformly and submitted entirely. For each patient with a positive margin or extraprostatic extension we determined whether these pathological characteristics would have been diagnosed had the specimen been examined by 3 partial sampling techniques. The Harrell concordance index was used to quantify the predictive performance of the Cox models based on the potential findings of the different sampling methods. Results: Partial sampling methods 1 and 2, which included the examination of alternate slides, missed 13% to 21% of positive margins and 27% to 46% of extraprostatic extensions. The effect on biochemical recurrence-free survival of these undetected pathological features was similar to that of positive margins and extraprostatic extension that would have been diagnosed by corresponding techniques. Method 3, which sampled the entire posterior region, the mid anterior prostate and the rest of the ipsilateral anterior gland (if sizeable tumor was seen), detected 95% of positive margins and 94% of extraprostatic extensions. The extraprostatic extension missed by this method was not associated with a significant increase in the risk of biochemical recurrence. The Harrell concordance index of the multivariate models was 0.806, 0.797, 0.795 and 0.804 based on the results of complete sampling, and methods 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusions: Examining alternate sections of prostatectomy specimen results in missing clinically important positive margins and extraprostatic extension. It decreases our ability to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-90
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume190
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Recurrence
Survival
Proportional Hazards Models
Prostate
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • mortality
  • pathology, surgical
  • prognosis
  • prostate
  • prostatectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Prognostic implications of partial sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens : Comparison of 3 methods. / Iremashvili, Viacheslav; Lokeshwar, Soum D.; Jorda, Merce; Pelaez, Liset; Soloway, Mark S.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 190, No. 1, 01.07.2013, p. 84-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Iremashvili, Viacheslav ; Lokeshwar, Soum D. ; Jorda, Merce ; Pelaez, Liset ; Soloway, Mark S. / Prognostic implications of partial sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens : Comparison of 3 methods. In: Journal of Urology. 2013 ; Vol. 190, No. 1. pp. 84-90.
@article{95e0b12caa2e46029af8e8be1533a0fd,
title = "Prognostic implications of partial sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens: Comparison of 3 methods",
abstract = "Purpose: We analyzed the prognostic implications of positive margins and extraprostatic extension missed by different methods of partially sampling prostatectomy specimens. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 1,499 patients treated with radical prostatectomy. All specimens were processed uniformly and submitted entirely. For each patient with a positive margin or extraprostatic extension we determined whether these pathological characteristics would have been diagnosed had the specimen been examined by 3 partial sampling techniques. The Harrell concordance index was used to quantify the predictive performance of the Cox models based on the potential findings of the different sampling methods. Results: Partial sampling methods 1 and 2, which included the examination of alternate slides, missed 13{\%} to 21{\%} of positive margins and 27{\%} to 46{\%} of extraprostatic extensions. The effect on biochemical recurrence-free survival of these undetected pathological features was similar to that of positive margins and extraprostatic extension that would have been diagnosed by corresponding techniques. Method 3, which sampled the entire posterior region, the mid anterior prostate and the rest of the ipsilateral anterior gland (if sizeable tumor was seen), detected 95{\%} of positive margins and 94{\%} of extraprostatic extensions. The extraprostatic extension missed by this method was not associated with a significant increase in the risk of biochemical recurrence. The Harrell concordance index of the multivariate models was 0.806, 0.797, 0.795 and 0.804 based on the results of complete sampling, and methods 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusions: Examining alternate sections of prostatectomy specimen results in missing clinically important positive margins and extraprostatic extension. It decreases our ability to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival.",
keywords = "mortality, pathology, surgical, prognosis, prostate, prostatectomy",
author = "Viacheslav Iremashvili and Lokeshwar, {Soum D.} and Merce Jorda and Liset Pelaez and Soloway, {Mark S.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.021",
language = "English",
volume = "190",
pages = "84--90",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prognostic implications of partial sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens

T2 - Comparison of 3 methods

AU - Iremashvili, Viacheslav

AU - Lokeshwar, Soum D.

AU - Jorda, Merce

AU - Pelaez, Liset

AU - Soloway, Mark S.

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - Purpose: We analyzed the prognostic implications of positive margins and extraprostatic extension missed by different methods of partially sampling prostatectomy specimens. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 1,499 patients treated with radical prostatectomy. All specimens were processed uniformly and submitted entirely. For each patient with a positive margin or extraprostatic extension we determined whether these pathological characteristics would have been diagnosed had the specimen been examined by 3 partial sampling techniques. The Harrell concordance index was used to quantify the predictive performance of the Cox models based on the potential findings of the different sampling methods. Results: Partial sampling methods 1 and 2, which included the examination of alternate slides, missed 13% to 21% of positive margins and 27% to 46% of extraprostatic extensions. The effect on biochemical recurrence-free survival of these undetected pathological features was similar to that of positive margins and extraprostatic extension that would have been diagnosed by corresponding techniques. Method 3, which sampled the entire posterior region, the mid anterior prostate and the rest of the ipsilateral anterior gland (if sizeable tumor was seen), detected 95% of positive margins and 94% of extraprostatic extensions. The extraprostatic extension missed by this method was not associated with a significant increase in the risk of biochemical recurrence. The Harrell concordance index of the multivariate models was 0.806, 0.797, 0.795 and 0.804 based on the results of complete sampling, and methods 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusions: Examining alternate sections of prostatectomy specimen results in missing clinically important positive margins and extraprostatic extension. It decreases our ability to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival.

AB - Purpose: We analyzed the prognostic implications of positive margins and extraprostatic extension missed by different methods of partially sampling prostatectomy specimens. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 1,499 patients treated with radical prostatectomy. All specimens were processed uniformly and submitted entirely. For each patient with a positive margin or extraprostatic extension we determined whether these pathological characteristics would have been diagnosed had the specimen been examined by 3 partial sampling techniques. The Harrell concordance index was used to quantify the predictive performance of the Cox models based on the potential findings of the different sampling methods. Results: Partial sampling methods 1 and 2, which included the examination of alternate slides, missed 13% to 21% of positive margins and 27% to 46% of extraprostatic extensions. The effect on biochemical recurrence-free survival of these undetected pathological features was similar to that of positive margins and extraprostatic extension that would have been diagnosed by corresponding techniques. Method 3, which sampled the entire posterior region, the mid anterior prostate and the rest of the ipsilateral anterior gland (if sizeable tumor was seen), detected 95% of positive margins and 94% of extraprostatic extensions. The extraprostatic extension missed by this method was not associated with a significant increase in the risk of biochemical recurrence. The Harrell concordance index of the multivariate models was 0.806, 0.797, 0.795 and 0.804 based on the results of complete sampling, and methods 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusions: Examining alternate sections of prostatectomy specimen results in missing clinically important positive margins and extraprostatic extension. It decreases our ability to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival.

KW - mortality

KW - pathology, surgical

KW - prognosis

KW - prostate

KW - prostatectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878865883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878865883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.021

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 23246479

AN - SCOPUS:84878865883

VL - 190

SP - 84

EP - 90

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 1

ER -