Professional characteristics and job satisfaction among SGIM members

A comparison of part-time and full-time physician members

Rachel B. Levine, Rebecca A. Harrison, Hilit Mechaber, Christopher Phillips, Thomas H. Gallagher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As more physicians work part-time (PT), the faculty, institutions, and organizations that represent them should understand the factors that motivate and satisfy these physicians. OBJECTIVE: Compare factors associated with job satisfaction among PT and full-time (FT) academic physicians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM), a national, academic Internal Medicine organization. RESULTS: Fifty percent (1,396 of 2,772) of SGIM members responded, 11% work PT. Compared to FT, PT physicians were more often female (85% vs 38%, p<.001), clinicians (Cs) or clinician-educators (CEs) (84% vs 56%, p<.001), and of a lower rank (77% vs 61%, p=.001). Job satisfaction was similar between PT and FT Cs and CEs. For PT Cs and CEs, record of publication (11% vs 21%, p=.04) and local and national recognition (24% vs 36%, p=.03) were less important to overall job satisfaction compared to FT Cs and CEs. In multivariate analysis, academic rank (odds ratio [OR]=7.18, 95%CI=1.40-36.50) was associated with higher satisfaction among PT Cs and CEs. CONCLUSIONS: PT and FT C and CE SGIM members report similar satisfaction, but different factors contribute to satisfaction. Knowing what motivates and satisfies PT physicians may allow medical centers to retain faculty and create positions to help them to fulfill their potential.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1218-1221
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume23
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2008

Fingerprint

Job Satisfaction
Internal Medicine
Physicians
Publications

Keywords

  • Academic medicine
  • Part-time careers
  • Physician satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Professional characteristics and job satisfaction among SGIM members : A comparison of part-time and full-time physician members. / Levine, Rachel B.; Harrison, Rebecca A.; Mechaber, Hilit; Phillips, Christopher; Gallagher, Thomas H.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 8, 01.08.2008, p. 1218-1221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Levine, Rachel B. ; Harrison, Rebecca A. ; Mechaber, Hilit ; Phillips, Christopher ; Gallagher, Thomas H. / Professional characteristics and job satisfaction among SGIM members : A comparison of part-time and full-time physician members. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 23, No. 8. pp. 1218-1221.
@article{a7c8dd076b894002a1387dee41603fd7,
title = "Professional characteristics and job satisfaction among SGIM members: A comparison of part-time and full-time physician members",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: As more physicians work part-time (PT), the faculty, institutions, and organizations that represent them should understand the factors that motivate and satisfy these physicians. OBJECTIVE: Compare factors associated with job satisfaction among PT and full-time (FT) academic physicians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM), a national, academic Internal Medicine organization. RESULTS: Fifty percent (1,396 of 2,772) of SGIM members responded, 11{\%} work PT. Compared to FT, PT physicians were more often female (85{\%} vs 38{\%}, p<.001), clinicians (Cs) or clinician-educators (CEs) (84{\%} vs 56{\%}, p<.001), and of a lower rank (77{\%} vs 61{\%}, p=.001). Job satisfaction was similar between PT and FT Cs and CEs. For PT Cs and CEs, record of publication (11{\%} vs 21{\%}, p=.04) and local and national recognition (24{\%} vs 36{\%}, p=.03) were less important to overall job satisfaction compared to FT Cs and CEs. In multivariate analysis, academic rank (odds ratio [OR]=7.18, 95{\%}CI=1.40-36.50) was associated with higher satisfaction among PT Cs and CEs. CONCLUSIONS: PT and FT C and CE SGIM members report similar satisfaction, but different factors contribute to satisfaction. Knowing what motivates and satisfies PT physicians may allow medical centers to retain faculty and create positions to help them to fulfill their potential.",
keywords = "Academic medicine, Part-time careers, Physician satisfaction",
author = "Levine, {Rachel B.} and Harrison, {Rebecca A.} and Hilit Mechaber and Christopher Phillips and Gallagher, {Thomas H.}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-008-0635-8",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1218--1221",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Professional characteristics and job satisfaction among SGIM members

T2 - A comparison of part-time and full-time physician members

AU - Levine, Rachel B.

AU - Harrison, Rebecca A.

AU - Mechaber, Hilit

AU - Phillips, Christopher

AU - Gallagher, Thomas H.

PY - 2008/8/1

Y1 - 2008/8/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: As more physicians work part-time (PT), the faculty, institutions, and organizations that represent them should understand the factors that motivate and satisfy these physicians. OBJECTIVE: Compare factors associated with job satisfaction among PT and full-time (FT) academic physicians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM), a national, academic Internal Medicine organization. RESULTS: Fifty percent (1,396 of 2,772) of SGIM members responded, 11% work PT. Compared to FT, PT physicians were more often female (85% vs 38%, p<.001), clinicians (Cs) or clinician-educators (CEs) (84% vs 56%, p<.001), and of a lower rank (77% vs 61%, p=.001). Job satisfaction was similar between PT and FT Cs and CEs. For PT Cs and CEs, record of publication (11% vs 21%, p=.04) and local and national recognition (24% vs 36%, p=.03) were less important to overall job satisfaction compared to FT Cs and CEs. In multivariate analysis, academic rank (odds ratio [OR]=7.18, 95%CI=1.40-36.50) was associated with higher satisfaction among PT Cs and CEs. CONCLUSIONS: PT and FT C and CE SGIM members report similar satisfaction, but different factors contribute to satisfaction. Knowing what motivates and satisfies PT physicians may allow medical centers to retain faculty and create positions to help them to fulfill their potential.

AB - BACKGROUND: As more physicians work part-time (PT), the faculty, institutions, and organizations that represent them should understand the factors that motivate and satisfy these physicians. OBJECTIVE: Compare factors associated with job satisfaction among PT and full-time (FT) academic physicians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM), a national, academic Internal Medicine organization. RESULTS: Fifty percent (1,396 of 2,772) of SGIM members responded, 11% work PT. Compared to FT, PT physicians were more often female (85% vs 38%, p<.001), clinicians (Cs) or clinician-educators (CEs) (84% vs 56%, p<.001), and of a lower rank (77% vs 61%, p=.001). Job satisfaction was similar between PT and FT Cs and CEs. For PT Cs and CEs, record of publication (11% vs 21%, p=.04) and local and national recognition (24% vs 36%, p=.03) were less important to overall job satisfaction compared to FT Cs and CEs. In multivariate analysis, academic rank (odds ratio [OR]=7.18, 95%CI=1.40-36.50) was associated with higher satisfaction among PT Cs and CEs. CONCLUSIONS: PT and FT C and CE SGIM members report similar satisfaction, but different factors contribute to satisfaction. Knowing what motivates and satisfies PT physicians may allow medical centers to retain faculty and create positions to help them to fulfill their potential.

KW - Academic medicine

KW - Part-time careers

KW - Physician satisfaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49649094481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49649094481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-008-0635-8

DO - 10.1007/s11606-008-0635-8

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 1218

EP - 1221

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 8

ER -