Probabilistic stabilization targets

Luke G. Fitzpatrick, David L. Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We study stabilization targets: common environmental policy recommendations that specify a maximum probability of an environmental variable exceeding a fixed target (e.g., limit climate change to at most 2°C above pre-industrial). Previous work generally considers stabilization targets under certainty equivalence. Using an integrated assessment model with uncertainty about the sensitivity of the temperature to greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations (the climate sensitivity), learning, and random weather shocks, we calculate the optimal GHG emissions policy with and without stabilization targets. We characterize the range of feasible targets and show that the climate is difficult to control in the short run, although as learning resolves the planner eventually achieves the target with a sustained reduction in emissions over time. We find that uncertainty exacerbates the welfare cost of stabilization targets. First, the targets are inflexible and do not adjust to new information about the climate system. Second, the target forces the emissions policy to overreact to transient shocks. These effects are present only in a model with uncertainty. Introduction of a stabilization target into the baseline model with uncertainty results in a welfare loss of 4.7%, which is 66% higher than the cost of introducing the target in the certainty version of the model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)611-657
Number of pages47
JournalJournal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

stabilization
climate
greenhouse gas
learning
cost
environmental policy
Stabilization
weather
climate change
temperature
policy
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Learning
  • Probabilistic stabilization targets
  • Stabilization targets
  • Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Probabilistic stabilization targets. / Fitzpatrick, Luke G.; Kelly, David L.

In: Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.06.2017, p. 611-657.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{71228d8c904347a281c3b7d37c501de6,
title = "Probabilistic stabilization targets",
abstract = "We study stabilization targets: common environmental policy recommendations that specify a maximum probability of an environmental variable exceeding a fixed target (e.g., limit climate change to at most 2°C above pre-industrial). Previous work generally considers stabilization targets under certainty equivalence. Using an integrated assessment model with uncertainty about the sensitivity of the temperature to greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations (the climate sensitivity), learning, and random weather shocks, we calculate the optimal GHG emissions policy with and without stabilization targets. We characterize the range of feasible targets and show that the climate is difficult to control in the short run, although as learning resolves the planner eventually achieves the target with a sustained reduction in emissions over time. We find that uncertainty exacerbates the welfare cost of stabilization targets. First, the targets are inflexible and do not adjust to new information about the climate system. Second, the target forces the emissions policy to overreact to transient shocks. These effects are present only in a model with uncertainty. Introduction of a stabilization target into the baseline model with uncertainty results in a welfare loss of 4.7{\%}, which is 66{\%} higher than the cost of introducing the target in the certainty version of the model.",
keywords = "Climate change, Learning, Probabilistic stabilization targets, Stabilization targets, Uncertainty",
author = "Fitzpatrick, {Luke G.} and Kelly, {David L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/691687",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "611--657",
journal = "Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists",
issn = "2333-5955",
publisher = "University of Chicago Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Probabilistic stabilization targets

AU - Fitzpatrick, Luke G.

AU - Kelly, David L.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - We study stabilization targets: common environmental policy recommendations that specify a maximum probability of an environmental variable exceeding a fixed target (e.g., limit climate change to at most 2°C above pre-industrial). Previous work generally considers stabilization targets under certainty equivalence. Using an integrated assessment model with uncertainty about the sensitivity of the temperature to greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations (the climate sensitivity), learning, and random weather shocks, we calculate the optimal GHG emissions policy with and without stabilization targets. We characterize the range of feasible targets and show that the climate is difficult to control in the short run, although as learning resolves the planner eventually achieves the target with a sustained reduction in emissions over time. We find that uncertainty exacerbates the welfare cost of stabilization targets. First, the targets are inflexible and do not adjust to new information about the climate system. Second, the target forces the emissions policy to overreact to transient shocks. These effects are present only in a model with uncertainty. Introduction of a stabilization target into the baseline model with uncertainty results in a welfare loss of 4.7%, which is 66% higher than the cost of introducing the target in the certainty version of the model.

AB - We study stabilization targets: common environmental policy recommendations that specify a maximum probability of an environmental variable exceeding a fixed target (e.g., limit climate change to at most 2°C above pre-industrial). Previous work generally considers stabilization targets under certainty equivalence. Using an integrated assessment model with uncertainty about the sensitivity of the temperature to greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations (the climate sensitivity), learning, and random weather shocks, we calculate the optimal GHG emissions policy with and without stabilization targets. We characterize the range of feasible targets and show that the climate is difficult to control in the short run, although as learning resolves the planner eventually achieves the target with a sustained reduction in emissions over time. We find that uncertainty exacerbates the welfare cost of stabilization targets. First, the targets are inflexible and do not adjust to new information about the climate system. Second, the target forces the emissions policy to overreact to transient shocks. These effects are present only in a model with uncertainty. Introduction of a stabilization target into the baseline model with uncertainty results in a welfare loss of 4.7%, which is 66% higher than the cost of introducing the target in the certainty version of the model.

KW - Climate change

KW - Learning

KW - Probabilistic stabilization targets

KW - Stabilization targets

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031105498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031105498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/691687

DO - 10.1086/691687

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85031105498

VL - 4

SP - 611

EP - 657

JO - Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists

JF - Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists

SN - 2333-5955

IS - 2

ER -