PRISM development: Iterative design using human factors tools

W. A. Rogers, T. L. Mitzner, A. D. Fisk, W. R. Boot, N. Charness, Sara J Czaja, Joseph Sharit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: We conducted a field trial to assess the relative benefits of: (i) a computer system referred to as PRISM (Personal Reminder Information and Social Management) versus (ii) a paper-based system containing comparable information (e.g., community information, educational resources, games). To evaluate the differential effects, we had to ensure that both systems were usable by and useful for the target users (i.e., older adults at risk for social isolation). In addition, the instructions for use and the training had to be clear and effective. To that end, we employed a human factors approach to the development of the PRISM system. Human factors practitioners investigate the capabilities and limitations of people and the demands placed on them when they interact with a system. Method: Our approach was multifaceted: (i) needs assessment with target users - we conducted a survey of older adults with computer experience to determine how they used a computer and the internet; (ii) we interviewed older adults who lack computer experience to assess their needs and interest in PRISM; (iii) we identified a prototype system to use as the starting point for PRISM and conducted a heuristic evaluation and cognitive walk-through by experts; (iv) we conducted detailed user testing of all experimental materials; and (v) we developed and tested a detailed instruction and support system. Results & Discussion: The survey and interviews yielded content ideas and challenges to be met in the design of the system. The evaluation by experts and target users identified user needs and design recommendations that were implemented in the redesign (e.g., meaningful icons and labels, navigation demands). The need for extensive training and instructional support became clear through the development and testing process, and thus these materials were integral to the implementation process. Overall, these data illustrate how human factors assessment tools provided valuable insights for design of the field trial, a necessary first step to ensure reliable and valid behavioral assessments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74
Number of pages1
JournalGerontechnology
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Information Management
Human engineering
Management Information Systems
Training Support
Social Isolation
Needs Assessment
Computer Systems
Internet
Testing
Interviews
Labels
Navigation
Computer systems
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Computer technology
  • Housing & daily activities
  • User-centered design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Gerontology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Rogers, W. A., Mitzner, T. L., Fisk, A. D., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2014). PRISM development: Iterative design using human factors tools. Gerontechnology, 13(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2014.13.02.039.00

PRISM development : Iterative design using human factors tools. / Rogers, W. A.; Mitzner, T. L.; Fisk, A. D.; Boot, W. R.; Charness, N.; Czaja, Sara J; Sharit, Joseph.

In: Gerontechnology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2014, p. 74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rogers, WA, Mitzner, TL, Fisk, AD, Boot, WR, Charness, N, Czaja, SJ & Sharit, J 2014, 'PRISM development: Iterative design using human factors tools', Gerontechnology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 74. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2014.13.02.039.00
Rogers WA, Mitzner TL, Fisk AD, Boot WR, Charness N, Czaja SJ et al. PRISM development: Iterative design using human factors tools. Gerontechnology. 2014;13(2):74. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2014.13.02.039.00
Rogers, W. A. ; Mitzner, T. L. ; Fisk, A. D. ; Boot, W. R. ; Charness, N. ; Czaja, Sara J ; Sharit, Joseph. / PRISM development : Iterative design using human factors tools. In: Gerontechnology. 2014 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 74.
@article{993511c1d03f442abd6e13d612c5f823,
title = "PRISM development: Iterative design using human factors tools",
abstract = "Purpose: We conducted a field trial to assess the relative benefits of: (i) a computer system referred to as PRISM (Personal Reminder Information and Social Management) versus (ii) a paper-based system containing comparable information (e.g., community information, educational resources, games). To evaluate the differential effects, we had to ensure that both systems were usable by and useful for the target users (i.e., older adults at risk for social isolation). In addition, the instructions for use and the training had to be clear and effective. To that end, we employed a human factors approach to the development of the PRISM system. Human factors practitioners investigate the capabilities and limitations of people and the demands placed on them when they interact with a system. Method: Our approach was multifaceted: (i) needs assessment with target users - we conducted a survey of older adults with computer experience to determine how they used a computer and the internet; (ii) we interviewed older adults who lack computer experience to assess their needs and interest in PRISM; (iii) we identified a prototype system to use as the starting point for PRISM and conducted a heuristic evaluation and cognitive walk-through by experts; (iv) we conducted detailed user testing of all experimental materials; and (v) we developed and tested a detailed instruction and support system. Results & Discussion: The survey and interviews yielded content ideas and challenges to be met in the design of the system. The evaluation by experts and target users identified user needs and design recommendations that were implemented in the redesign (e.g., meaningful icons and labels, navigation demands). The need for extensive training and instructional support became clear through the development and testing process, and thus these materials were integral to the implementation process. Overall, these data illustrate how human factors assessment tools provided valuable insights for design of the field trial, a necessary first step to ensure reliable and valid behavioral assessments.",
keywords = "Computer technology, Housing & daily activities, User-centered design",
author = "Rogers, {W. A.} and Mitzner, {T. L.} and Fisk, {A. D.} and Boot, {W. R.} and N. Charness and Czaja, {Sara J} and Joseph Sharit",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.4017/gt.2014.13.02.039.00",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "74",
journal = "Gerontechnology",
issn = "1569-1101",
publisher = "International Society for Gerontechnology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PRISM development

T2 - Iterative design using human factors tools

AU - Rogers, W. A.

AU - Mitzner, T. L.

AU - Fisk, A. D.

AU - Boot, W. R.

AU - Charness, N.

AU - Czaja, Sara J

AU - Sharit, Joseph

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose: We conducted a field trial to assess the relative benefits of: (i) a computer system referred to as PRISM (Personal Reminder Information and Social Management) versus (ii) a paper-based system containing comparable information (e.g., community information, educational resources, games). To evaluate the differential effects, we had to ensure that both systems were usable by and useful for the target users (i.e., older adults at risk for social isolation). In addition, the instructions for use and the training had to be clear and effective. To that end, we employed a human factors approach to the development of the PRISM system. Human factors practitioners investigate the capabilities and limitations of people and the demands placed on them when they interact with a system. Method: Our approach was multifaceted: (i) needs assessment with target users - we conducted a survey of older adults with computer experience to determine how they used a computer and the internet; (ii) we interviewed older adults who lack computer experience to assess their needs and interest in PRISM; (iii) we identified a prototype system to use as the starting point for PRISM and conducted a heuristic evaluation and cognitive walk-through by experts; (iv) we conducted detailed user testing of all experimental materials; and (v) we developed and tested a detailed instruction and support system. Results & Discussion: The survey and interviews yielded content ideas and challenges to be met in the design of the system. The evaluation by experts and target users identified user needs and design recommendations that were implemented in the redesign (e.g., meaningful icons and labels, navigation demands). The need for extensive training and instructional support became clear through the development and testing process, and thus these materials were integral to the implementation process. Overall, these data illustrate how human factors assessment tools provided valuable insights for design of the field trial, a necessary first step to ensure reliable and valid behavioral assessments.

AB - Purpose: We conducted a field trial to assess the relative benefits of: (i) a computer system referred to as PRISM (Personal Reminder Information and Social Management) versus (ii) a paper-based system containing comparable information (e.g., community information, educational resources, games). To evaluate the differential effects, we had to ensure that both systems were usable by and useful for the target users (i.e., older adults at risk for social isolation). In addition, the instructions for use and the training had to be clear and effective. To that end, we employed a human factors approach to the development of the PRISM system. Human factors practitioners investigate the capabilities and limitations of people and the demands placed on them when they interact with a system. Method: Our approach was multifaceted: (i) needs assessment with target users - we conducted a survey of older adults with computer experience to determine how they used a computer and the internet; (ii) we interviewed older adults who lack computer experience to assess their needs and interest in PRISM; (iii) we identified a prototype system to use as the starting point for PRISM and conducted a heuristic evaluation and cognitive walk-through by experts; (iv) we conducted detailed user testing of all experimental materials; and (v) we developed and tested a detailed instruction and support system. Results & Discussion: The survey and interviews yielded content ideas and challenges to be met in the design of the system. The evaluation by experts and target users identified user needs and design recommendations that were implemented in the redesign (e.g., meaningful icons and labels, navigation demands). The need for extensive training and instructional support became clear through the development and testing process, and thus these materials were integral to the implementation process. Overall, these data illustrate how human factors assessment tools provided valuable insights for design of the field trial, a necessary first step to ensure reliable and valid behavioral assessments.

KW - Computer technology

KW - Housing & daily activities

KW - User-centered design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929391178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929391178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4017/gt.2014.13.02.039.00

DO - 10.4017/gt.2014.13.02.039.00

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84929391178

VL - 13

SP - 74

JO - Gerontechnology

JF - Gerontechnology

SN - 1569-1101

IS - 2

ER -