Preoperative screening for HIV infection. A balanced view for the practicing surgeon

A. M. Fournier, R. Zeppa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Routine preoperative screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is becoming increasingly prevalent. Reasons in favor of routine screening include the following: (1) Knowledge of HIV status may allow the surgeon to decrease risk of infection. (2) The patient may benefit, because HIV infection may alter the risk-benefit ratio of a procedure. (3) Knowledge of HIV status will not affect how the patient is treated. Arguments against routine screening include the following: (1) Since the risk during individual procedures is low, it is unlikely that knowledge of HIV status can actually reduce risk. (2) Patient care may be negatively affected. (3) There is a possibility of false-positive results. (4) The accepted ethical standards of autonomy, confidentiality, and informed consent are not always adhered to. We explore these issues in detail. Recent work has framed the risk of surgeons and defined the reliability of diagnostic screening tests. All of these factors must be weighed before a surgeon can decide for or against a policy of routine preoperative screening.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1038-1040
Number of pages3
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume124
Issue number9
StatePublished - Jan 1 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Virus Diseases
HIV
Confidentiality
Informed Consent
Routine Diagnostic Tests
HIV-1
Patient Care
Odds Ratio
Surgeons
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Preoperative screening for HIV infection. A balanced view for the practicing surgeon. / Fournier, A. M.; Zeppa, R.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 124, No. 9, 01.01.1989, p. 1038-1040.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fournier, A. M. ; Zeppa, R. / Preoperative screening for HIV infection. A balanced view for the practicing surgeon. In: Archives of Surgery. 1989 ; Vol. 124, No. 9. pp. 1038-1040.
@article{0a9421a5ed674bb5a8e04b009018dbda,
title = "Preoperative screening for HIV infection. A balanced view for the practicing surgeon",
abstract = "Routine preoperative screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is becoming increasingly prevalent. Reasons in favor of routine screening include the following: (1) Knowledge of HIV status may allow the surgeon to decrease risk of infection. (2) The patient may benefit, because HIV infection may alter the risk-benefit ratio of a procedure. (3) Knowledge of HIV status will not affect how the patient is treated. Arguments against routine screening include the following: (1) Since the risk during individual procedures is low, it is unlikely that knowledge of HIV status can actually reduce risk. (2) Patient care may be negatively affected. (3) There is a possibility of false-positive results. (4) The accepted ethical standards of autonomy, confidentiality, and informed consent are not always adhered to. We explore these issues in detail. Recent work has framed the risk of surgeons and defined the reliability of diagnostic screening tests. All of these factors must be weighed before a surgeon can decide for or against a policy of routine preoperative screening.",
author = "Fournier, {A. M.} and R. Zeppa",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "124",
pages = "1038--1040",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preoperative screening for HIV infection. A balanced view for the practicing surgeon

AU - Fournier, A. M.

AU - Zeppa, R.

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - Routine preoperative screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is becoming increasingly prevalent. Reasons in favor of routine screening include the following: (1) Knowledge of HIV status may allow the surgeon to decrease risk of infection. (2) The patient may benefit, because HIV infection may alter the risk-benefit ratio of a procedure. (3) Knowledge of HIV status will not affect how the patient is treated. Arguments against routine screening include the following: (1) Since the risk during individual procedures is low, it is unlikely that knowledge of HIV status can actually reduce risk. (2) Patient care may be negatively affected. (3) There is a possibility of false-positive results. (4) The accepted ethical standards of autonomy, confidentiality, and informed consent are not always adhered to. We explore these issues in detail. Recent work has framed the risk of surgeons and defined the reliability of diagnostic screening tests. All of these factors must be weighed before a surgeon can decide for or against a policy of routine preoperative screening.

AB - Routine preoperative screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is becoming increasingly prevalent. Reasons in favor of routine screening include the following: (1) Knowledge of HIV status may allow the surgeon to decrease risk of infection. (2) The patient may benefit, because HIV infection may alter the risk-benefit ratio of a procedure. (3) Knowledge of HIV status will not affect how the patient is treated. Arguments against routine screening include the following: (1) Since the risk during individual procedures is low, it is unlikely that knowledge of HIV status can actually reduce risk. (2) Patient care may be negatively affected. (3) There is a possibility of false-positive results. (4) The accepted ethical standards of autonomy, confidentiality, and informed consent are not always adhered to. We explore these issues in detail. Recent work has framed the risk of surgeons and defined the reliability of diagnostic screening tests. All of these factors must be weighed before a surgeon can decide for or against a policy of routine preoperative screening.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024449070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024449070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2774903

AN - SCOPUS:0024449070

VL - 124

SP - 1038

EP - 1040

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 9

ER -