Predictors of preferences and utilities in men treated with 3D-CRT for prostate cancer

Deborah Watkins Bruner, Alexandra Hanlon, Susan Mazzoni, Susan Raysor, Andre Konski, Gerald Hanks, Alan Pollack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the preferences and utilities for prostate cancer health state scenarios of men treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and the predictors of treatment preferences. Methods and Materials: The preferences and utilities for probabilistic health states of impotence and incontinence associated with prostate cancer therapies were elicited from prostate cancer registry participants using a modified time trade-off interview. Sociodemographic, disease, and treatment characteristics, as well as quality-of-life scores, were assessed to determine the predictors of preferences. Results: Fifty-seven men treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy completed the time trade-off interview. Of these men, 83% had Stage T1-T2 and 30% were receiving hormonal therapy. The utilities followed a linear trend with declining scores for increasing risk of poorer health states. Men showed an increased preference for health states associated with radiotherapy compared with surgery or hormonal therapy. Univariate predictors of preference included income and marital status. Multivariate predictors of preferences included more aggressive therapy and better prognostic indicators. Current quality-of-life scores in terms of global, sexual, or urinary function were poor predictors of preferences. Conclusion: Preference elicitation can assist in decision-making, and understanding the predictors of patient preferences can assist in identifying factors that may increase patient perceptions of poorer outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-42
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatic Neoplasms
cancer
health
therapy
predictions
Conformal Radiotherapy
radiation therapy
Health
Therapeutics
Quality of Life
Interviews
income
Patient Preference
Marital Status
decision making
Erectile Dysfunction
surgery
Registries
Decision Making
Radiotherapy

Keywords

  • Preferences
  • Prostate cancer
  • Quality of life
  • Utility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation

Cite this

Predictors of preferences and utilities in men treated with 3D-CRT for prostate cancer. / Bruner, Deborah Watkins; Hanlon, Alexandra; Mazzoni, Susan; Raysor, Susan; Konski, Andre; Hanks, Gerald; Pollack, Alan.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 58, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 34-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bruner, Deborah Watkins ; Hanlon, Alexandra ; Mazzoni, Susan ; Raysor, Susan ; Konski, Andre ; Hanks, Gerald ; Pollack, Alan. / Predictors of preferences and utilities in men treated with 3D-CRT for prostate cancer. In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2004 ; Vol. 58, No. 1. pp. 34-42.
@article{8fab5b3fba7e4ac987f5cff5aa4ea2eb,
title = "Predictors of preferences and utilities in men treated with 3D-CRT for prostate cancer",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the preferences and utilities for prostate cancer health state scenarios of men treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and the predictors of treatment preferences. Methods and Materials: The preferences and utilities for probabilistic health states of impotence and incontinence associated with prostate cancer therapies were elicited from prostate cancer registry participants using a modified time trade-off interview. Sociodemographic, disease, and treatment characteristics, as well as quality-of-life scores, were assessed to determine the predictors of preferences. Results: Fifty-seven men treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy completed the time trade-off interview. Of these men, 83{\%} had Stage T1-T2 and 30{\%} were receiving hormonal therapy. The utilities followed a linear trend with declining scores for increasing risk of poorer health states. Men showed an increased preference for health states associated with radiotherapy compared with surgery or hormonal therapy. Univariate predictors of preference included income and marital status. Multivariate predictors of preferences included more aggressive therapy and better prognostic indicators. Current quality-of-life scores in terms of global, sexual, or urinary function were poor predictors of preferences. Conclusion: Preference elicitation can assist in decision-making, and understanding the predictors of patient preferences can assist in identifying factors that may increase patient perceptions of poorer outcomes.",
keywords = "Preferences, Prostate cancer, Quality of life, Utility",
author = "Bruner, {Deborah Watkins} and Alexandra Hanlon and Susan Mazzoni and Susan Raysor and Andre Konski and Gerald Hanks and Alan Pollack",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01434-2",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "34--42",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors of preferences and utilities in men treated with 3D-CRT for prostate cancer

AU - Bruner, Deborah Watkins

AU - Hanlon, Alexandra

AU - Mazzoni, Susan

AU - Raysor, Susan

AU - Konski, Andre

AU - Hanks, Gerald

AU - Pollack, Alan

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To assess the preferences and utilities for prostate cancer health state scenarios of men treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and the predictors of treatment preferences. Methods and Materials: The preferences and utilities for probabilistic health states of impotence and incontinence associated with prostate cancer therapies were elicited from prostate cancer registry participants using a modified time trade-off interview. Sociodemographic, disease, and treatment characteristics, as well as quality-of-life scores, were assessed to determine the predictors of preferences. Results: Fifty-seven men treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy completed the time trade-off interview. Of these men, 83% had Stage T1-T2 and 30% were receiving hormonal therapy. The utilities followed a linear trend with declining scores for increasing risk of poorer health states. Men showed an increased preference for health states associated with radiotherapy compared with surgery or hormonal therapy. Univariate predictors of preference included income and marital status. Multivariate predictors of preferences included more aggressive therapy and better prognostic indicators. Current quality-of-life scores in terms of global, sexual, or urinary function were poor predictors of preferences. Conclusion: Preference elicitation can assist in decision-making, and understanding the predictors of patient preferences can assist in identifying factors that may increase patient perceptions of poorer outcomes.

AB - Purpose: To assess the preferences and utilities for prostate cancer health state scenarios of men treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and the predictors of treatment preferences. Methods and Materials: The preferences and utilities for probabilistic health states of impotence and incontinence associated with prostate cancer therapies were elicited from prostate cancer registry participants using a modified time trade-off interview. Sociodemographic, disease, and treatment characteristics, as well as quality-of-life scores, were assessed to determine the predictors of preferences. Results: Fifty-seven men treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy completed the time trade-off interview. Of these men, 83% had Stage T1-T2 and 30% were receiving hormonal therapy. The utilities followed a linear trend with declining scores for increasing risk of poorer health states. Men showed an increased preference for health states associated with radiotherapy compared with surgery or hormonal therapy. Univariate predictors of preference included income and marital status. Multivariate predictors of preferences included more aggressive therapy and better prognostic indicators. Current quality-of-life scores in terms of global, sexual, or urinary function were poor predictors of preferences. Conclusion: Preference elicitation can assist in decision-making, and understanding the predictors of patient preferences can assist in identifying factors that may increase patient perceptions of poorer outcomes.

KW - Preferences

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Quality of life

KW - Utility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345732562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345732562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01434-2

DO - 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01434-2

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 34

EP - 42

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 1

ER -