Predictors of Homicide-Suicide Affirmation in Acute and Chronic Pain Patients

David A Fishbain, Daniel Bruns, John E Lewis, John Mark Disorbio, Jinrun Gao, Laura J. Meyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. 1) Determine and compare prevalence for homicide-suicide (H-S) affirmation in community non-patients (N = 478), community patients (N = 158), acute pain patients (APPs; N = 326), and chronic pain patients (CPPs; N = 341); and 2) Develop H-S predictor models in APPs and CPPs.Design. A large set of items containing the H-S item was administered to the above groups, who were compared statistically for H-S endorsement. APPs and CPPs affirming the H-S item were compared with those not affirming on all available variables including the Battery for Health Improvement (BHI 2) with significant variables (P ≤ 0.001) utilized in predictor models for H-S in APPs and CPPs.Setting. Community plus rehabilitation facilities.Results. The above population groups affirmed the H-S item according to the following percentages: healthy community 1.88%, community patients 3.16%, rehabilitation patients without pain 3.64%, rehabilitation AAPs 3.99%, and rehabilitation CPPs 4.40%. For both APPs and CPPs, the H-S item was significantly correlated with some suicidality items and some homicide items. The model for APPs identified "having a suicide plan" as being predictive of H-S affirmation. For CPPs, the items of having thoughts of revenge killing, being motivated to seek revenge without any verbal warning, and the Doctor Dissatisfaction Scale of the BHI 2 predicted H-S affirmation. The APPs model classified 96% of the APPs correctly, while the CPPs model classified 97% of the CPPs correctly. These predictor rates, however, were no better than the base rate.Conclusion. The prevalence of H-S affirmation within APPs and CPPs is not insignificant. The APPs predictor model points to a close association between H-S affirmation and suicidality. The CPPs model indicates that there is a close association between H-S affirmation, and anger/hostility and anger directed at physicians. These results, however, should not lead to the belief that CPPs are at greater risk for actual H-S completion for the following reasons: 1) H-S is an extremely rare event; and 2) predictive validity of the H-S item for actual H-S completion has not been determined. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-137
Number of pages11
JournalPain Medicine
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Homicide
Acute Pain
Chronic Pain
Suicide
Rehabilitation
Anger
3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonic acid
Hostility

Keywords

  • Acute pain
  • Acute pain patients
  • Battery of health improvement (BHI 2)
  • Chronic pain
  • Chronic pain patients
  • Community pain-free controls
  • Dual death
  • Homicide
  • Homicide-suicide ideation
  • Prevalence
  • Suicidality
  • Suicide

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Fishbain, D. A., Bruns, D., Lewis, J. E., Disorbio, J. M., Gao, J., & Meyer, L. J. (2011). Predictors of Homicide-Suicide Affirmation in Acute and Chronic Pain Patients. Pain Medicine, 12(1), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01013.x

Predictors of Homicide-Suicide Affirmation in Acute and Chronic Pain Patients. / Fishbain, David A; Bruns, Daniel; Lewis, John E; Disorbio, John Mark; Gao, Jinrun; Meyer, Laura J.

In: Pain Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 127-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fishbain, DA, Bruns, D, Lewis, JE, Disorbio, JM, Gao, J & Meyer, LJ 2011, 'Predictors of Homicide-Suicide Affirmation in Acute and Chronic Pain Patients', Pain Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01013.x
Fishbain DA, Bruns D, Lewis JE, Disorbio JM, Gao J, Meyer LJ. Predictors of Homicide-Suicide Affirmation in Acute and Chronic Pain Patients. Pain Medicine. 2011 Jan 1;12(1):127-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01013.x
Fishbain, David A ; Bruns, Daniel ; Lewis, John E ; Disorbio, John Mark ; Gao, Jinrun ; Meyer, Laura J. / Predictors of Homicide-Suicide Affirmation in Acute and Chronic Pain Patients. In: Pain Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 127-137.
@article{4509716467bd4a68a1f599cf1421f32d,
title = "Predictors of Homicide-Suicide Affirmation in Acute and Chronic Pain Patients",
abstract = "Objectives. 1) Determine and compare prevalence for homicide-suicide (H-S) affirmation in community non-patients (N = 478), community patients (N = 158), acute pain patients (APPs; N = 326), and chronic pain patients (CPPs; N = 341); and 2) Develop H-S predictor models in APPs and CPPs.Design. A large set of items containing the H-S item was administered to the above groups, who were compared statistically for H-S endorsement. APPs and CPPs affirming the H-S item were compared with those not affirming on all available variables including the Battery for Health Improvement (BHI 2) with significant variables (P ≤ 0.001) utilized in predictor models for H-S in APPs and CPPs.Setting. Community plus rehabilitation facilities.Results. The above population groups affirmed the H-S item according to the following percentages: healthy community 1.88{\%}, community patients 3.16{\%}, rehabilitation patients without pain 3.64{\%}, rehabilitation AAPs 3.99{\%}, and rehabilitation CPPs 4.40{\%}. For both APPs and CPPs, the H-S item was significantly correlated with some suicidality items and some homicide items. The model for APPs identified {"}having a suicide plan{"} as being predictive of H-S affirmation. For CPPs, the items of having thoughts of revenge killing, being motivated to seek revenge without any verbal warning, and the Doctor Dissatisfaction Scale of the BHI 2 predicted H-S affirmation. The APPs model classified 96{\%} of the APPs correctly, while the CPPs model classified 97{\%} of the CPPs correctly. These predictor rates, however, were no better than the base rate.Conclusion. The prevalence of H-S affirmation within APPs and CPPs is not insignificant. The APPs predictor model points to a close association between H-S affirmation and suicidality. The CPPs model indicates that there is a close association between H-S affirmation, and anger/hostility and anger directed at physicians. These results, however, should not lead to the belief that CPPs are at greater risk for actual H-S completion for the following reasons: 1) H-S is an extremely rare event; and 2) predictive validity of the H-S item for actual H-S completion has not been determined. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",
keywords = "Acute pain, Acute pain patients, Battery of health improvement (BHI 2), Chronic pain, Chronic pain patients, Community pain-free controls, Dual death, Homicide, Homicide-suicide ideation, Prevalence, Suicidality, Suicide",
author = "Fishbain, {David A} and Daniel Bruns and Lewis, {John E} and Disorbio, {John Mark} and Jinrun Gao and Meyer, {Laura J.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01013.x",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "127--137",
journal = "Pain Medicine",
issn = "1526-2375",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors of Homicide-Suicide Affirmation in Acute and Chronic Pain Patients

AU - Fishbain, David A

AU - Bruns, Daniel

AU - Lewis, John E

AU - Disorbio, John Mark

AU - Gao, Jinrun

AU - Meyer, Laura J.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Objectives. 1) Determine and compare prevalence for homicide-suicide (H-S) affirmation in community non-patients (N = 478), community patients (N = 158), acute pain patients (APPs; N = 326), and chronic pain patients (CPPs; N = 341); and 2) Develop H-S predictor models in APPs and CPPs.Design. A large set of items containing the H-S item was administered to the above groups, who were compared statistically for H-S endorsement. APPs and CPPs affirming the H-S item were compared with those not affirming on all available variables including the Battery for Health Improvement (BHI 2) with significant variables (P ≤ 0.001) utilized in predictor models for H-S in APPs and CPPs.Setting. Community plus rehabilitation facilities.Results. The above population groups affirmed the H-S item according to the following percentages: healthy community 1.88%, community patients 3.16%, rehabilitation patients without pain 3.64%, rehabilitation AAPs 3.99%, and rehabilitation CPPs 4.40%. For both APPs and CPPs, the H-S item was significantly correlated with some suicidality items and some homicide items. The model for APPs identified "having a suicide plan" as being predictive of H-S affirmation. For CPPs, the items of having thoughts of revenge killing, being motivated to seek revenge without any verbal warning, and the Doctor Dissatisfaction Scale of the BHI 2 predicted H-S affirmation. The APPs model classified 96% of the APPs correctly, while the CPPs model classified 97% of the CPPs correctly. These predictor rates, however, were no better than the base rate.Conclusion. The prevalence of H-S affirmation within APPs and CPPs is not insignificant. The APPs predictor model points to a close association between H-S affirmation and suicidality. The CPPs model indicates that there is a close association between H-S affirmation, and anger/hostility and anger directed at physicians. These results, however, should not lead to the belief that CPPs are at greater risk for actual H-S completion for the following reasons: 1) H-S is an extremely rare event; and 2) predictive validity of the H-S item for actual H-S completion has not been determined. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

AB - Objectives. 1) Determine and compare prevalence for homicide-suicide (H-S) affirmation in community non-patients (N = 478), community patients (N = 158), acute pain patients (APPs; N = 326), and chronic pain patients (CPPs; N = 341); and 2) Develop H-S predictor models in APPs and CPPs.Design. A large set of items containing the H-S item was administered to the above groups, who were compared statistically for H-S endorsement. APPs and CPPs affirming the H-S item were compared with those not affirming on all available variables including the Battery for Health Improvement (BHI 2) with significant variables (P ≤ 0.001) utilized in predictor models for H-S in APPs and CPPs.Setting. Community plus rehabilitation facilities.Results. The above population groups affirmed the H-S item according to the following percentages: healthy community 1.88%, community patients 3.16%, rehabilitation patients without pain 3.64%, rehabilitation AAPs 3.99%, and rehabilitation CPPs 4.40%. For both APPs and CPPs, the H-S item was significantly correlated with some suicidality items and some homicide items. The model for APPs identified "having a suicide plan" as being predictive of H-S affirmation. For CPPs, the items of having thoughts of revenge killing, being motivated to seek revenge without any verbal warning, and the Doctor Dissatisfaction Scale of the BHI 2 predicted H-S affirmation. The APPs model classified 96% of the APPs correctly, while the CPPs model classified 97% of the CPPs correctly. These predictor rates, however, were no better than the base rate.Conclusion. The prevalence of H-S affirmation within APPs and CPPs is not insignificant. The APPs predictor model points to a close association between H-S affirmation and suicidality. The CPPs model indicates that there is a close association between H-S affirmation, and anger/hostility and anger directed at physicians. These results, however, should not lead to the belief that CPPs are at greater risk for actual H-S completion for the following reasons: 1) H-S is an extremely rare event; and 2) predictive validity of the H-S item for actual H-S completion has not been determined. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

KW - Acute pain

KW - Acute pain patients

KW - Battery of health improvement (BHI 2)

KW - Chronic pain

KW - Chronic pain patients

KW - Community pain-free controls

KW - Dual death

KW - Homicide

KW - Homicide-suicide ideation

KW - Prevalence

KW - Suicidality

KW - Suicide

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651235955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78651235955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01013.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01013.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21087407

AN - SCOPUS:78651235955

VL - 12

SP - 127

EP - 137

JO - Pain Medicine

JF - Pain Medicine

SN - 1526-2375

IS - 1

ER -