Predictive Bayesian dose-response assessment for appraising absolute health risk from available information

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Currently, no general measure of population health response to untestable doses of chemicals and microbes has been established that accounts for uncertainty quantitatively and indicates relative toxicity or virulence directly. Untestable doses include those corresponding to the 2.74 × 10-7 illnesses per exposure expressed in goals of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Surface Water Treatment Rule, and doses of human bioterror agents. For example, it is shown that relative Benchmark Dose (BMD) values depend upon the level of confidence assumed. Because of the lack of scientific basis for this level, BMDs are not comparable among health stressors for untestable doses and stressors. In this paper a new predictive Bayesian method is proposed for absolute and relative dose-response assessment based on available information. Information may include toxicological judgment, epidemiological statistics, genetic information, related data, and numeric dose-response data. Results for rotavirus indicate a "safe dose" of 6.3 × 10-7 focus-forming units/exposure, approximately one-half log above the dose corresponding to the maximum risk for any pathogen assuming a 100% infection rate. The result further indicates the limited value of data in refining the assessment, due to the inability of data to reduce variability. The method is suggested for assessing risks of new and existing chemicals and pathogens, as a basis for prioritizing expenditures for protection against environmental and terrorist threats.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-78
Number of pages10
JournalHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment
Volume10
Issue number1 SPEC. ISS.
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2004

Fingerprint

Health risks
Pathogens
health risk
Health
Benchmarking
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Bayes Theorem
Water Purification
Rotavirus
Conservation of Natural Resources
Environmental Protection Agency
Health Expenditures
Environmental protection
Water treatment
Surface waters
Toxicology
Refining
Uncertainty
Toxicity
Virulence

Keywords

  • Absolute
  • Bayesian
  • Comparative risk
  • Dose-response
  • Predictive
  • Rotavirus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecological Modeling
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{87c916de2d004076a9dce209cb53e4e5,
title = "Predictive Bayesian dose-response assessment for appraising absolute health risk from available information",
abstract = "Currently, no general measure of population health response to untestable doses of chemicals and microbes has been established that accounts for uncertainty quantitatively and indicates relative toxicity or virulence directly. Untestable doses include those corresponding to the 2.74 × 10-7 illnesses per exposure expressed in goals of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Surface Water Treatment Rule, and doses of human bioterror agents. For example, it is shown that relative Benchmark Dose (BMD) values depend upon the level of confidence assumed. Because of the lack of scientific basis for this level, BMDs are not comparable among health stressors for untestable doses and stressors. In this paper a new predictive Bayesian method is proposed for absolute and relative dose-response assessment based on available information. Information may include toxicological judgment, epidemiological statistics, genetic information, related data, and numeric dose-response data. Results for rotavirus indicate a {"}safe dose{"} of 6.3 × 10-7 focus-forming units/exposure, approximately one-half log above the dose corresponding to the maximum risk for any pathogen assuming a 100{\%} infection rate. The result further indicates the limited value of data in refining the assessment, due to the inability of data to reduce variability. The method is suggested for assessing risks of new and existing chemicals and pathogens, as a basis for prioritizing expenditures for protection against environmental and terrorist threats.",
keywords = "Absolute, Bayesian, Comparative risk, Dose-response, Predictive, Rotavirus",
author = "Englehardt, {James Douglas}",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10807030490280963",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "69--78",
journal = "Human and Ecological Risk Assessment (HERA)",
issn = "1080-7039",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1 SPEC. ISS.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictive Bayesian dose-response assessment for appraising absolute health risk from available information

AU - Englehardt, James Douglas

PY - 2004/2/1

Y1 - 2004/2/1

N2 - Currently, no general measure of population health response to untestable doses of chemicals and microbes has been established that accounts for uncertainty quantitatively and indicates relative toxicity or virulence directly. Untestable doses include those corresponding to the 2.74 × 10-7 illnesses per exposure expressed in goals of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Surface Water Treatment Rule, and doses of human bioterror agents. For example, it is shown that relative Benchmark Dose (BMD) values depend upon the level of confidence assumed. Because of the lack of scientific basis for this level, BMDs are not comparable among health stressors for untestable doses and stressors. In this paper a new predictive Bayesian method is proposed for absolute and relative dose-response assessment based on available information. Information may include toxicological judgment, epidemiological statistics, genetic information, related data, and numeric dose-response data. Results for rotavirus indicate a "safe dose" of 6.3 × 10-7 focus-forming units/exposure, approximately one-half log above the dose corresponding to the maximum risk for any pathogen assuming a 100% infection rate. The result further indicates the limited value of data in refining the assessment, due to the inability of data to reduce variability. The method is suggested for assessing risks of new and existing chemicals and pathogens, as a basis for prioritizing expenditures for protection against environmental and terrorist threats.

AB - Currently, no general measure of population health response to untestable doses of chemicals and microbes has been established that accounts for uncertainty quantitatively and indicates relative toxicity or virulence directly. Untestable doses include those corresponding to the 2.74 × 10-7 illnesses per exposure expressed in goals of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Surface Water Treatment Rule, and doses of human bioterror agents. For example, it is shown that relative Benchmark Dose (BMD) values depend upon the level of confidence assumed. Because of the lack of scientific basis for this level, BMDs are not comparable among health stressors for untestable doses and stressors. In this paper a new predictive Bayesian method is proposed for absolute and relative dose-response assessment based on available information. Information may include toxicological judgment, epidemiological statistics, genetic information, related data, and numeric dose-response data. Results for rotavirus indicate a "safe dose" of 6.3 × 10-7 focus-forming units/exposure, approximately one-half log above the dose corresponding to the maximum risk for any pathogen assuming a 100% infection rate. The result further indicates the limited value of data in refining the assessment, due to the inability of data to reduce variability. The method is suggested for assessing risks of new and existing chemicals and pathogens, as a basis for prioritizing expenditures for protection against environmental and terrorist threats.

KW - Absolute

KW - Bayesian

KW - Comparative risk

KW - Dose-response

KW - Predictive

KW - Rotavirus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642367264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642367264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10807030490280963

DO - 10.1080/10807030490280963

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:1642367264

VL - 10

SP - 69

EP - 78

JO - Human and Ecological Risk Assessment (HERA)

JF - Human and Ecological Risk Assessment (HERA)

SN - 1080-7039

IS - 1 SPEC. ISS.

ER -