Predicting radiographic changes at the first visit following operative repair of distal radius fractures

Daniel D. Bohl, Andrea B. Lese, Joseph T. Patterson, Jonathan N. Grauer, Seth Dodds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To test the hypothesis that clinical assessment reliably identifies patients with radiographic changes (including loss of reduction, hardware failure, and hardware migration) at the initial visit following operative repair of distal radius fractures.

Methods We identified 102 patients undergoing operative repair of distal radius fractures. Radiographs and clinical notes were reviewed.

Results At the initial postoperative visit, 11 patients had more than normal postoperative pain, 0 had deformity, 0 had crepitus with gentle motion, and 0 had instability at the fracture site on examination. These 11 patients were considered to have positive clinical assessments, but none had radiographic changes on x-rays taken that day. Three patients had negative clinical assessments but had radiographic changes noted at the initial postoperative visit. There were no additional radiographic changes between the series taken at the initial postoperative visit and series taken at later postoperative visits.

Conclusions These data suggest that for purposes of detecting radiographic changes, radiography at the initial visit is helpful, whereas radiography at subsequent visits may not be. Radiography at subsequent visits may be useful to monitor bony healing, which we did not investigate. Type of study/level of evidence Diagnostic IV.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-56
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radius Fractures
Radiography
Postoperative Pain
X-Rays

Keywords

  • Distal radius fracture
  • follow-up radiographs
  • operative repair
  • physical examination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Predicting radiographic changes at the first visit following operative repair of distal radius fractures. / Bohl, Daniel D.; Lese, Andrea B.; Patterson, Joseph T.; Grauer, Jonathan N.; Dodds, Seth.

In: Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 49-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bohl, Daniel D. ; Lese, Andrea B. ; Patterson, Joseph T. ; Grauer, Jonathan N. ; Dodds, Seth. / Predicting radiographic changes at the first visit following operative repair of distal radius fractures. In: Journal of Hand Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 49-56.
@article{eb8ac0f7c256408eb195b0f0be4c2c14,
title = "Predicting radiographic changes at the first visit following operative repair of distal radius fractures",
abstract = "Purpose To test the hypothesis that clinical assessment reliably identifies patients with radiographic changes (including loss of reduction, hardware failure, and hardware migration) at the initial visit following operative repair of distal radius fractures.Methods We identified 102 patients undergoing operative repair of distal radius fractures. Radiographs and clinical notes were reviewed.Results At the initial postoperative visit, 11 patients had more than normal postoperative pain, 0 had deformity, 0 had crepitus with gentle motion, and 0 had instability at the fracture site on examination. These 11 patients were considered to have positive clinical assessments, but none had radiographic changes on x-rays taken that day. Three patients had negative clinical assessments but had radiographic changes noted at the initial postoperative visit. There were no additional radiographic changes between the series taken at the initial postoperative visit and series taken at later postoperative visits.Conclusions These data suggest that for purposes of detecting radiographic changes, radiography at the initial visit is helpful, whereas radiography at subsequent visits may not be. Radiography at subsequent visits may be useful to monitor bony healing, which we did not investigate. Type of study/level of evidence Diagnostic IV.",
keywords = "Distal radius fracture, follow-up radiographs, operative repair, physical examination",
author = "Bohl, {Daniel D.} and Lese, {Andrea B.} and Patterson, {Joseph T.} and Grauer, {Jonathan N.} and Seth Dodds",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.08.038",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "49--56",
journal = "Journal of Hand Surgery",
issn = "0363-5023",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting radiographic changes at the first visit following operative repair of distal radius fractures

AU - Bohl, Daniel D.

AU - Lese, Andrea B.

AU - Patterson, Joseph T.

AU - Grauer, Jonathan N.

AU - Dodds, Seth

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Purpose To test the hypothesis that clinical assessment reliably identifies patients with radiographic changes (including loss of reduction, hardware failure, and hardware migration) at the initial visit following operative repair of distal radius fractures.Methods We identified 102 patients undergoing operative repair of distal radius fractures. Radiographs and clinical notes were reviewed.Results At the initial postoperative visit, 11 patients had more than normal postoperative pain, 0 had deformity, 0 had crepitus with gentle motion, and 0 had instability at the fracture site on examination. These 11 patients were considered to have positive clinical assessments, but none had radiographic changes on x-rays taken that day. Three patients had negative clinical assessments but had radiographic changes noted at the initial postoperative visit. There were no additional radiographic changes between the series taken at the initial postoperative visit and series taken at later postoperative visits.Conclusions These data suggest that for purposes of detecting radiographic changes, radiography at the initial visit is helpful, whereas radiography at subsequent visits may not be. Radiography at subsequent visits may be useful to monitor bony healing, which we did not investigate. Type of study/level of evidence Diagnostic IV.

AB - Purpose To test the hypothesis that clinical assessment reliably identifies patients with radiographic changes (including loss of reduction, hardware failure, and hardware migration) at the initial visit following operative repair of distal radius fractures.Methods We identified 102 patients undergoing operative repair of distal radius fractures. Radiographs and clinical notes were reviewed.Results At the initial postoperative visit, 11 patients had more than normal postoperative pain, 0 had deformity, 0 had crepitus with gentle motion, and 0 had instability at the fracture site on examination. These 11 patients were considered to have positive clinical assessments, but none had radiographic changes on x-rays taken that day. Three patients had negative clinical assessments but had radiographic changes noted at the initial postoperative visit. There were no additional radiographic changes between the series taken at the initial postoperative visit and series taken at later postoperative visits.Conclusions These data suggest that for purposes of detecting radiographic changes, radiography at the initial visit is helpful, whereas radiography at subsequent visits may not be. Radiography at subsequent visits may be useful to monitor bony healing, which we did not investigate. Type of study/level of evidence Diagnostic IV.

KW - Distal radius fracture

KW - follow-up radiographs

KW - operative repair

KW - physical examination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919485513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919485513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.08.038

DO - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.08.038

M3 - Article

C2 - 25443168

AN - SCOPUS:84919485513

VL - 40

SP - 49

EP - 56

JO - Journal of Hand Surgery

JF - Journal of Hand Surgery

SN - 0363-5023

IS - 1

ER -