Pre-/postprocedure measures for minimally invasive, nonenergy aesthetic treatments: A survey

Michael H. Gold, Anneke Andriessen, David J. Goldberg, Komel V. Grover, Shasa Hu, Z. Paul Lorenc, Stephen H. Mandy, Janelle H. Vega

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Non-energy based devices used in aesthetic medicine include treatments such as microdermabrasion, microneedling, threads, and chemical peels. Practitioners may use these devices to address signs of facial photo- and chronological aging (fine lines, wrinkles, pigmentary, and skin textural changes). Currently, consensus papers or guidelines are lacking in peri-procedural measures or their potential role in the prevention or treatment of adverse events in non-energy based aesthetic procedures. Aims: To explore current practices using non-energy devices, a survey was developed to identify trends in peri-procedure treatment measures. Patients/Methods: The survey was sent electronically to 2000 dermatologists and 388 plastic surgeons. Randomly selected sites included those practicing medical aesthetics using non-energy devices for facial rejuvenation. The survey gathered information related to practitioner demographics, types of devices used, and peri-procedural measures for non-energy device-based treatments. Results: The survey was active from February to May 2019. Nine hundred and twenty clinicians opened the survey, and 109 surveys were completed, providing a total response rate of 11.8%. The results revealed inconsistencies with regards to skin preparation strategies and post-procedure care. While the majority of clinicians indicated a need for topical treatments to reduce inflammation, prevent scarring, and shorten time to healing, a standard of care was not observed. Conclusions: The results of this survey confirm a lack of standardized measures for peri-procedural care when using non-energy based devices for aesthetic medicine treatments. These findings emphasize the need for evidence-based recommendations for optimizing patient outcomes, reducing and managing adverse events, and shortening time to healing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1587-1592
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Volume19
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2020

Keywords

  • aesthetic treatments
  • nonenergy devices
  • peri-procedural measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Pre-/postprocedure measures for minimally invasive, nonenergy aesthetic treatments: A survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Gold, M. H., Andriessen, A., Goldberg, D. J., Grover, K. V., Hu, S., Lorenc, Z. P., Mandy, S. H., & Vega, J. H. (2020). Pre-/postprocedure measures for minimally invasive, nonenergy aesthetic treatments: A survey. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 19(7), 1587-1592. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13460