Power and action in critical theory across disciplines: Implications for critical community psychology

Heather Davidson, Scot Evans, Cynthia Ganote, Jorie Henrickson, Lynette Jacobs-Priebe, Diana L. Jones, Isaac Prilleltensky, Manuel Riemer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although critical scholarship and community psychology share similar aspirations, the links between them remain unexplored and under-theorized. In this article we explore the implications of critical scholarship in various specialties for the field of community psychology. To understand the contributions of critical scholarship to a theory of power and action for social change, we conducted a systematic analysis of a ten-year period of publications in seven journals associated with the critical scholarship tradition. We created precise criteria for the concepts of power and action and applied them to the publications. Results indicate an interesting paradox at play. Whereas community psychology is more action oriented than critical scholarship, its actions fall short of challenging institutionalized power structures and the status quo; and whereas critical scholarship is more challenging of the status quo than community psychology in theory, it has failed to produce viable actions that challenge the status quo. We discuss the implications of this state of affairs for the development of a more critical community psychology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-49
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Journal of Community Psychology
Volume38
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

critical theory
psychology
Psychology
community
Publications
Social Change
Power (Psychology)
social change

Keywords

  • Action
  • Critical scholarship
  • Discourse
  • Interdisciplinary collaborations
  • Power

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Power and action in critical theory across disciplines : Implications for critical community psychology. / Davidson, Heather; Evans, Scot; Ganote, Cynthia; Henrickson, Jorie; Jacobs-Priebe, Lynette; Jones, Diana L.; Prilleltensky, Isaac; Riemer, Manuel.

In: American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 38, No. 1-2, 01.09.2006, p. 35-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davidson, Heather ; Evans, Scot ; Ganote, Cynthia ; Henrickson, Jorie ; Jacobs-Priebe, Lynette ; Jones, Diana L. ; Prilleltensky, Isaac ; Riemer, Manuel. / Power and action in critical theory across disciplines : Implications for critical community psychology. In: American Journal of Community Psychology. 2006 ; Vol. 38, No. 1-2. pp. 35-49.
@article{5f6e8d80cfa347cb84014d907053bafc,
title = "Power and action in critical theory across disciplines: Implications for critical community psychology",
abstract = "Although critical scholarship and community psychology share similar aspirations, the links between them remain unexplored and under-theorized. In this article we explore the implications of critical scholarship in various specialties for the field of community psychology. To understand the contributions of critical scholarship to a theory of power and action for social change, we conducted a systematic analysis of a ten-year period of publications in seven journals associated with the critical scholarship tradition. We created precise criteria for the concepts of power and action and applied them to the publications. Results indicate an interesting paradox at play. Whereas community psychology is more action oriented than critical scholarship, its actions fall short of challenging institutionalized power structures and the status quo; and whereas critical scholarship is more challenging of the status quo than community psychology in theory, it has failed to produce viable actions that challenge the status quo. We discuss the implications of this state of affairs for the development of a more critical community psychology.",
keywords = "Action, Critical scholarship, Discourse, Interdisciplinary collaborations, Power",
author = "Heather Davidson and Scot Evans and Cynthia Ganote and Jorie Henrickson and Lynette Jacobs-Priebe and Jones, {Diana L.} and Isaac Prilleltensky and Manuel Riemer",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10464-006-9061-4",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "35--49",
journal = "American Journal of Community Psychology",
issn = "0091-0562",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power and action in critical theory across disciplines

T2 - Implications for critical community psychology

AU - Davidson, Heather

AU - Evans, Scot

AU - Ganote, Cynthia

AU - Henrickson, Jorie

AU - Jacobs-Priebe, Lynette

AU - Jones, Diana L.

AU - Prilleltensky, Isaac

AU - Riemer, Manuel

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - Although critical scholarship and community psychology share similar aspirations, the links between them remain unexplored and under-theorized. In this article we explore the implications of critical scholarship in various specialties for the field of community psychology. To understand the contributions of critical scholarship to a theory of power and action for social change, we conducted a systematic analysis of a ten-year period of publications in seven journals associated with the critical scholarship tradition. We created precise criteria for the concepts of power and action and applied them to the publications. Results indicate an interesting paradox at play. Whereas community psychology is more action oriented than critical scholarship, its actions fall short of challenging institutionalized power structures and the status quo; and whereas critical scholarship is more challenging of the status quo than community psychology in theory, it has failed to produce viable actions that challenge the status quo. We discuss the implications of this state of affairs for the development of a more critical community psychology.

AB - Although critical scholarship and community psychology share similar aspirations, the links between them remain unexplored and under-theorized. In this article we explore the implications of critical scholarship in various specialties for the field of community psychology. To understand the contributions of critical scholarship to a theory of power and action for social change, we conducted a systematic analysis of a ten-year period of publications in seven journals associated with the critical scholarship tradition. We created precise criteria for the concepts of power and action and applied them to the publications. Results indicate an interesting paradox at play. Whereas community psychology is more action oriented than critical scholarship, its actions fall short of challenging institutionalized power structures and the status quo; and whereas critical scholarship is more challenging of the status quo than community psychology in theory, it has failed to produce viable actions that challenge the status quo. We discuss the implications of this state of affairs for the development of a more critical community psychology.

KW - Action

KW - Critical scholarship

KW - Discourse

KW - Interdisciplinary collaborations

KW - Power

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749243129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749243129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10464-006-9061-4

DO - 10.1007/s10464-006-9061-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 16802180

AN - SCOPUS:33749243129

VL - 38

SP - 35

EP - 49

JO - American Journal of Community Psychology

JF - American Journal of Community Psychology

SN - 0091-0562

IS - 1-2

ER -