Poverty and rights

James Nickel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I defend economic and social rights as human rights, and as a feasible approach to addressing world poverty. I propose a modest conception of economic and social rights that includes rights to subsistence, basic health care and basic education. The second part of the paper defends these three rights. I begin by sketching a pluralistic justificatory framework that starts with abstract norms pertaining to life, leading a life, avoiding severely cruel treatment, and avoiding severe unfairness. I argue that economic and social rights are not excessively burdensome on their addressees and that they are feasible worldwide in the appropriate sense. Severe poverty violates economic and social rights, and accordingly generates high-priority duties of many parties to work towards its elimination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)385-402
Number of pages18
JournalPhilosophical Quarterly
Volume55
Issue number220
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Economics
Poverty
Social Rights
Basic Education
Subsistence
Human Rights
Addressee
World Poverty
Conception
Healthcare

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

Poverty and rights. / Nickel, James.

In: Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 55, No. 220, 07.2005, p. 385-402.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nickel, James. / Poverty and rights. In: Philosophical Quarterly. 2005 ; Vol. 55, No. 220. pp. 385-402.
@article{2440172222af4eab9d6b3d8e77470601,
title = "Poverty and rights",
abstract = "I defend economic and social rights as human rights, and as a feasible approach to addressing world poverty. I propose a modest conception of economic and social rights that includes rights to subsistence, basic health care and basic education. The second part of the paper defends these three rights. I begin by sketching a pluralistic justificatory framework that starts with abstract norms pertaining to life, leading a life, avoiding severely cruel treatment, and avoiding severe unfairness. I argue that economic and social rights are not excessively burdensome on their addressees and that they are feasible worldwide in the appropriate sense. Severe poverty violates economic and social rights, and accordingly generates high-priority duties of many parties to work towards its elimination.",
author = "James Nickel",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00406.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "385--402",
journal = "Philosophical Quarterly",
issn = "0031-8094",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "220",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Poverty and rights

AU - Nickel, James

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - I defend economic and social rights as human rights, and as a feasible approach to addressing world poverty. I propose a modest conception of economic and social rights that includes rights to subsistence, basic health care and basic education. The second part of the paper defends these three rights. I begin by sketching a pluralistic justificatory framework that starts with abstract norms pertaining to life, leading a life, avoiding severely cruel treatment, and avoiding severe unfairness. I argue that economic and social rights are not excessively burdensome on their addressees and that they are feasible worldwide in the appropriate sense. Severe poverty violates economic and social rights, and accordingly generates high-priority duties of many parties to work towards its elimination.

AB - I defend economic and social rights as human rights, and as a feasible approach to addressing world poverty. I propose a modest conception of economic and social rights that includes rights to subsistence, basic health care and basic education. The second part of the paper defends these three rights. I begin by sketching a pluralistic justificatory framework that starts with abstract norms pertaining to life, leading a life, avoiding severely cruel treatment, and avoiding severe unfairness. I argue that economic and social rights are not excessively burdensome on their addressees and that they are feasible worldwide in the appropriate sense. Severe poverty violates economic and social rights, and accordingly generates high-priority duties of many parties to work towards its elimination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54249120680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54249120680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00406.x

DO - 10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00406.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:54249120680

VL - 55

SP - 385

EP - 402

JO - Philosophical Quarterly

JF - Philosophical Quarterly

SN - 0031-8094

IS - 220

ER -