Postoperative bony stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal: Evaluation of 164 symptomatic patients with axial radiography

R. M. Quencer; F. R. Murtagh; M. J.D. Post; H. L. Rosomoff; N. A. Stokes

doi:10.2214/ajr.131.6.1059

Postoperative bony stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal: Evaluation of 164 symptomatic patients with axial radiography

R. M. Quencer, F. R. Murtagh, M. J.D. Post, H. L. Rosomoff, N. A. Stokes

Radiology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) and transverse axial tomography (TAT) were used to study the lumbar spines of 164 patients with persistent or recurrent low back pain and/or radiculopathy. Of those patients with previous spinal fusion and of those with previous discectomy, 43% and 28% respectively, demonstrated bony stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal. Of the patients who underwent surgery for this narrowed canal, 91% showed clinical improvement.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1059-1064
Number of pages	6
Journal	Unknown Journal
Volume	131
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.131.6.1059
State	Published - Jan 1 1978

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Access to Document

10.2214/ajr.131.6.1059

Cite this

@article{4298c8cc7c43400f878bd6919291afeb,

title = "Postoperative bony stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal: Evaluation of 164 symptomatic patients with axial radiography",

abstract = "Computed tomography (CT) and transverse axial tomography (TAT) were used to study the lumbar spines of 164 patients with persistent or recurrent low back pain and/or radiculopathy. Of those patients with previous spinal fusion and of those with previous discectomy, 43% and 28% respectively, demonstrated bony stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal. Of the patients who underwent surgery for this narrowed canal, 91% showed clinical improvement.",

author = "Quencer, {R. M.} and Murtagh, {F. R.} and Post, {M. J.D.} and Rosomoff, {H. L.} and Stokes, {N. A.}",

year = "1978",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.2214/ajr.131.6.1059",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "131",

pages = "1059--1064",

journal = "Scientific Computing and Instrumentation",

issn = "1078-8956",

publisher = "Springer Wien",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postoperative bony stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal

T2 - Evaluation of 164 symptomatic patients with axial radiography

AU - Quencer, R. M.

AU - Murtagh, F. R.

AU - Post, M. J.D.

AU - Rosomoff, H. L.

AU - Stokes, N. A.

PY - 1978/1/1

Y1 - 1978/1/1

N2 - Computed tomography (CT) and transverse axial tomography (TAT) were used to study the lumbar spines of 164 patients with persistent or recurrent low back pain and/or radiculopathy. Of those patients with previous spinal fusion and of those with previous discectomy, 43% and 28% respectively, demonstrated bony stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal. Of the patients who underwent surgery for this narrowed canal, 91% showed clinical improvement.

AB - Computed tomography (CT) and transverse axial tomography (TAT) were used to study the lumbar spines of 164 patients with persistent or recurrent low back pain and/or radiculopathy. Of those patients with previous spinal fusion and of those with previous discectomy, 43% and 28% respectively, demonstrated bony stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal. Of the patients who underwent surgery for this narrowed canal, 91% showed clinical improvement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018188886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018188886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/ajr.131.6.1059

DO - 10.2214/ajr.131.6.1059

M3 - Article

C2 - 104574

AN - SCOPUS:0018188886

VL - 131

SP - 1059

EP - 1064

JO - Scientific Computing and Instrumentation

JF - Scientific Computing and Instrumentation

SN - 1078-8956

IS - 6

ER -

Postoperative bony stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal: Evaluation of 164 symptomatic patients with axial radiography

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this