Post “Post-Truth”: Are We There Yet?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

After explaining why, after dealing with post-modernist confusions about truth in various books and articles from the mid-1990s to, most recently, 2014 (§1), Haack returns to the topic of truth. She begins (§2) with some thoughts about the claim that concern for truth is on the decline, and perhaps at a new low; a claim that, sadly, may well be true. Then (§3) she looks at some of the many forms that carelessness with the truth may take, and shows that, so far from revealing that the concept of truth is seriously problematic or that there is no such thing as objective truth, it simply makes no sense to say that lies, half-truths, etc., are ubiquitous unless there is such a thing as truth, and a legitimate truth-concept. After that, (§4) she argues that, of course, there is such a thing as objective truth, and a robust truth-concept. And finally, (§5) she suggests some ways to fight against the rising tide of unconcern for truth—and gives her answer to the (trick) question in her subtitle.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)258-275
Number of pages18
JournalTheoria (Sweden)
Volume85
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

1990s
Postmodernist
Subtitles
Confusion
Trick

Keywords

  • evidence
  • half-truths
  • lies
  • testimony
  • truth
  • [un]concern for truth
  • “post-truth” era

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

Post “Post-Truth” : Are We There Yet? / Haack, Susan.

In: Theoria (Sweden), Vol. 85, No. 4, 01.01.2019, p. 258-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Haack, Susan. / Post “Post-Truth” : Are We There Yet?. In: Theoria (Sweden). 2019 ; Vol. 85, No. 4. pp. 258-275.
@article{57e580943ece4f9ea49fa0bacb000cb8,
title = "Post “Post-Truth”: Are We There Yet?",
abstract = "After explaining why, after dealing with post-modernist confusions about truth in various books and articles from the mid-1990s to, most recently, 2014 (§1), Haack returns to the topic of truth. She begins (§2) with some thoughts about the claim that concern for truth is on the decline, and perhaps at a new low; a claim that, sadly, may well be true. Then (§3) she looks at some of the many forms that carelessness with the truth may take, and shows that, so far from revealing that the concept of truth is seriously problematic or that there is no such thing as objective truth, it simply makes no sense to say that lies, half-truths, etc., are ubiquitous unless there is such a thing as truth, and a legitimate truth-concept. After that, (§4) she argues that, of course, there is such a thing as objective truth, and a robust truth-concept. And finally, (§5) she suggests some ways to fight against the rising tide of unconcern for truth—and gives her answer to the (trick) question in her subtitle.",
keywords = "evidence, half-truths, lies, testimony, truth, [un]concern for truth, “post-truth” era",
author = "Susan Haack",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/theo.12198",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "258--275",
journal = "Theoria",
issn = "0040-5825",
publisher = "DPHT Stockholm",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Post “Post-Truth”

T2 - Are We There Yet?

AU - Haack, Susan

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - After explaining why, after dealing with post-modernist confusions about truth in various books and articles from the mid-1990s to, most recently, 2014 (§1), Haack returns to the topic of truth. She begins (§2) with some thoughts about the claim that concern for truth is on the decline, and perhaps at a new low; a claim that, sadly, may well be true. Then (§3) she looks at some of the many forms that carelessness with the truth may take, and shows that, so far from revealing that the concept of truth is seriously problematic or that there is no such thing as objective truth, it simply makes no sense to say that lies, half-truths, etc., are ubiquitous unless there is such a thing as truth, and a legitimate truth-concept. After that, (§4) she argues that, of course, there is such a thing as objective truth, and a robust truth-concept. And finally, (§5) she suggests some ways to fight against the rising tide of unconcern for truth—and gives her answer to the (trick) question in her subtitle.

AB - After explaining why, after dealing with post-modernist confusions about truth in various books and articles from the mid-1990s to, most recently, 2014 (§1), Haack returns to the topic of truth. She begins (§2) with some thoughts about the claim that concern for truth is on the decline, and perhaps at a new low; a claim that, sadly, may well be true. Then (§3) she looks at some of the many forms that carelessness with the truth may take, and shows that, so far from revealing that the concept of truth is seriously problematic or that there is no such thing as objective truth, it simply makes no sense to say that lies, half-truths, etc., are ubiquitous unless there is such a thing as truth, and a legitimate truth-concept. After that, (§4) she argues that, of course, there is such a thing as objective truth, and a robust truth-concept. And finally, (§5) she suggests some ways to fight against the rising tide of unconcern for truth—and gives her answer to the (trick) question in her subtitle.

KW - evidence

KW - half-truths

KW - lies

KW - testimony

KW - truth

KW - [un]concern for truth

KW - “post-truth” era

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070853853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070853853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/theo.12198

DO - 10.1111/theo.12198

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070853853

VL - 85

SP - 258

EP - 275

JO - Theoria

JF - Theoria

SN - 0040-5825

IS - 4

ER -