Point /nonpoint source trading of pollution abatement: Choosing the right trading ratio

Arun S. Malik, David Letson, Stephen R. Crutchfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In programs for trading pollution abatement between point and nonpoint sources, the trading ratio specifies the rate at which nonpoint source abatement can be substituted for point source abatement. The appropriate value of this ratio is unclear because of qualitative differences between the two classes of sources. To identify the optimal trading ratio, we develop and analyze a model of point/nonpoint trading. We find the optimal trading ratio depends on the relative costs of enforcing point versus nonpoint reductions and on the uncertainty associated with nonpoint loadings. The uncertainty does not imply a lower bound for the optimal trading ratio.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)959-967
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume75
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

pollution control
Uncertainty
uncertainty
Costs and Cost Analysis
Pollution abatement

Keywords

  • Enforcement costs
  • Nonpoint source pollution
  • Pollution trading
  • Technology adoption
  • Water quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Point /nonpoint source trading of pollution abatement : Choosing the right trading ratio. / Malik, Arun S.; Letson, David; Crutchfield, Stephen R.

In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 75, No. 4, 1993, p. 959-967.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{15c2e5463b2144d793e35fb977d979b9,
title = "Point /nonpoint source trading of pollution abatement: Choosing the right trading ratio",
abstract = "In programs for trading pollution abatement between point and nonpoint sources, the trading ratio specifies the rate at which nonpoint source abatement can be substituted for point source abatement. The appropriate value of this ratio is unclear because of qualitative differences between the two classes of sources. To identify the optimal trading ratio, we develop and analyze a model of point/nonpoint trading. We find the optimal trading ratio depends on the relative costs of enforcing point versus nonpoint reductions and on the uncertainty associated with nonpoint loadings. The uncertainty does not imply a lower bound for the optimal trading ratio.",
keywords = "Enforcement costs, Nonpoint source pollution, Pollution trading, Technology adoption, Water quality",
author = "Malik, {Arun S.} and David Letson and Crutchfield, {Stephen R.}",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.2307/1243983",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "959--967",
journal = "American Journal of Agricultural Economics",
issn = "0002-9092",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Point /nonpoint source trading of pollution abatement

T2 - Choosing the right trading ratio

AU - Malik, Arun S.

AU - Letson, David

AU - Crutchfield, Stephen R.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - In programs for trading pollution abatement between point and nonpoint sources, the trading ratio specifies the rate at which nonpoint source abatement can be substituted for point source abatement. The appropriate value of this ratio is unclear because of qualitative differences between the two classes of sources. To identify the optimal trading ratio, we develop and analyze a model of point/nonpoint trading. We find the optimal trading ratio depends on the relative costs of enforcing point versus nonpoint reductions and on the uncertainty associated with nonpoint loadings. The uncertainty does not imply a lower bound for the optimal trading ratio.

AB - In programs for trading pollution abatement between point and nonpoint sources, the trading ratio specifies the rate at which nonpoint source abatement can be substituted for point source abatement. The appropriate value of this ratio is unclear because of qualitative differences between the two classes of sources. To identify the optimal trading ratio, we develop and analyze a model of point/nonpoint trading. We find the optimal trading ratio depends on the relative costs of enforcing point versus nonpoint reductions and on the uncertainty associated with nonpoint loadings. The uncertainty does not imply a lower bound for the optimal trading ratio.

KW - Enforcement costs

KW - Nonpoint source pollution

KW - Pollution trading

KW - Technology adoption

KW - Water quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963012194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963012194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/1243983

DO - 10.2307/1243983

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84963012194

VL - 75

SP - 959

EP - 967

JO - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

JF - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

SN - 0002-9092

IS - 4

ER -