Plant allocation of carbon to defense as a function of herbivory, light and nutrient availability

Donald L. DeAngelis, Shu Ju, Rongsong Liu, John P. Bryant, Stephen A. Gourley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We use modeling to determine the optimal relative plant carbon allocations between foliage, fine roots, anti-herbivore defense, and reproduction to maximize reproductive output. The model treats these plant components and the herbivore compartment as variables. Herbivory is assumed to be purely folivory. Key external factors include nutrient availability, degree of shading, and intensity of herbivory. Three alternative functional responses are used for herbivory, two of which are variations on donor-dependent herbivore (models 1a and 1b) and one of which is a Lotka-Volterra type of interaction (model 2). All three were modified to include the negative effect of chemical defenses on the herbivore. Analysis showed that, for all three models, two stable equilibria could occur, which differs from most common functional responses when no plant defense component is included. Optimal strategies of carbon allocation were defined as the maximum biomass of reproductive propagules produced per unit time, and found to vary with changes in external factors. Increased intensity of herbivory always led to an increase in the fractional allocation of carbon to defense. Decreases in available limiting nutrient generally led to increasing importance of defense. Decreases in available light had little effect on defense but led to increased allocation to foliage. Decreases in limiting nutrient and available light led to decreases in allocation to reproduction in models 1a and 1b but not model 2. Increases in allocation to plant defense were usually accompanied by shifts in carbon allocation away from fine roots, possibly because higher plant defense reduced the loss of nutrients to herbivory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-456
Number of pages12
JournalTheoretical Ecology
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2012

Fingerprint

light availability
nutrient availability
herbivory
plant defense
biomass allocation
carbon
herbivore
functional response
fine root
foliage
nutrient
antiherbivore defense
chemical defense
shading
defence
allocation
biomass
modeling

Keywords

  • Carbon allocation
  • Plant defenses
  • Plant growth model
  • Plant secondary metabolites
  • Plant-herbivore interactions
  • Reproductive fitness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecological Modeling
  • Ecology

Cite this

Plant allocation of carbon to defense as a function of herbivory, light and nutrient availability. / DeAngelis, Donald L.; Ju, Shu; Liu, Rongsong; Bryant, John P.; Gourley, Stephen A.

In: Theoretical Ecology, Vol. 5, No. 3, 01.08.2012, p. 445-456.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DeAngelis, Donald L. ; Ju, Shu ; Liu, Rongsong ; Bryant, John P. ; Gourley, Stephen A. / Plant allocation of carbon to defense as a function of herbivory, light and nutrient availability. In: Theoretical Ecology. 2012 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 445-456.
@article{f3844bf0747f471cbc0719df7c23f018,
title = "Plant allocation of carbon to defense as a function of herbivory, light and nutrient availability",
abstract = "We use modeling to determine the optimal relative plant carbon allocations between foliage, fine roots, anti-herbivore defense, and reproduction to maximize reproductive output. The model treats these plant components and the herbivore compartment as variables. Herbivory is assumed to be purely folivory. Key external factors include nutrient availability, degree of shading, and intensity of herbivory. Three alternative functional responses are used for herbivory, two of which are variations on donor-dependent herbivore (models 1a and 1b) and one of which is a Lotka-Volterra type of interaction (model 2). All three were modified to include the negative effect of chemical defenses on the herbivore. Analysis showed that, for all three models, two stable equilibria could occur, which differs from most common functional responses when no plant defense component is included. Optimal strategies of carbon allocation were defined as the maximum biomass of reproductive propagules produced per unit time, and found to vary with changes in external factors. Increased intensity of herbivory always led to an increase in the fractional allocation of carbon to defense. Decreases in available limiting nutrient generally led to increasing importance of defense. Decreases in available light had little effect on defense but led to increased allocation to foliage. Decreases in limiting nutrient and available light led to decreases in allocation to reproduction in models 1a and 1b but not model 2. Increases in allocation to plant defense were usually accompanied by shifts in carbon allocation away from fine roots, possibly because higher plant defense reduced the loss of nutrients to herbivory.",
keywords = "Carbon allocation, Plant defenses, Plant growth model, Plant secondary metabolites, Plant-herbivore interactions, Reproductive fitness",
author = "DeAngelis, {Donald L.} and Shu Ju and Rongsong Liu and Bryant, {John P.} and Gourley, {Stephen A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12080-011-0135-z",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "445--456",
journal = "Theoretical Ecology",
issn = "1874-1738",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plant allocation of carbon to defense as a function of herbivory, light and nutrient availability

AU - DeAngelis, Donald L.

AU - Ju, Shu

AU - Liu, Rongsong

AU - Bryant, John P.

AU - Gourley, Stephen A.

PY - 2012/8/1

Y1 - 2012/8/1

N2 - We use modeling to determine the optimal relative plant carbon allocations between foliage, fine roots, anti-herbivore defense, and reproduction to maximize reproductive output. The model treats these plant components and the herbivore compartment as variables. Herbivory is assumed to be purely folivory. Key external factors include nutrient availability, degree of shading, and intensity of herbivory. Three alternative functional responses are used for herbivory, two of which are variations on donor-dependent herbivore (models 1a and 1b) and one of which is a Lotka-Volterra type of interaction (model 2). All three were modified to include the negative effect of chemical defenses on the herbivore. Analysis showed that, for all three models, two stable equilibria could occur, which differs from most common functional responses when no plant defense component is included. Optimal strategies of carbon allocation were defined as the maximum biomass of reproductive propagules produced per unit time, and found to vary with changes in external factors. Increased intensity of herbivory always led to an increase in the fractional allocation of carbon to defense. Decreases in available limiting nutrient generally led to increasing importance of defense. Decreases in available light had little effect on defense but led to increased allocation to foliage. Decreases in limiting nutrient and available light led to decreases in allocation to reproduction in models 1a and 1b but not model 2. Increases in allocation to plant defense were usually accompanied by shifts in carbon allocation away from fine roots, possibly because higher plant defense reduced the loss of nutrients to herbivory.

AB - We use modeling to determine the optimal relative plant carbon allocations between foliage, fine roots, anti-herbivore defense, and reproduction to maximize reproductive output. The model treats these plant components and the herbivore compartment as variables. Herbivory is assumed to be purely folivory. Key external factors include nutrient availability, degree of shading, and intensity of herbivory. Three alternative functional responses are used for herbivory, two of which are variations on donor-dependent herbivore (models 1a and 1b) and one of which is a Lotka-Volterra type of interaction (model 2). All three were modified to include the negative effect of chemical defenses on the herbivore. Analysis showed that, for all three models, two stable equilibria could occur, which differs from most common functional responses when no plant defense component is included. Optimal strategies of carbon allocation were defined as the maximum biomass of reproductive propagules produced per unit time, and found to vary with changes in external factors. Increased intensity of herbivory always led to an increase in the fractional allocation of carbon to defense. Decreases in available limiting nutrient generally led to increasing importance of defense. Decreases in available light had little effect on defense but led to increased allocation to foliage. Decreases in limiting nutrient and available light led to decreases in allocation to reproduction in models 1a and 1b but not model 2. Increases in allocation to plant defense were usually accompanied by shifts in carbon allocation away from fine roots, possibly because higher plant defense reduced the loss of nutrients to herbivory.

KW - Carbon allocation

KW - Plant defenses

KW - Plant growth model

KW - Plant secondary metabolites

KW - Plant-herbivore interactions

KW - Reproductive fitness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864118583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864118583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12080-011-0135-z

DO - 10.1007/s12080-011-0135-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84864118583

VL - 5

SP - 445

EP - 456

JO - Theoretical Ecology

JF - Theoretical Ecology

SN - 1874-1738

IS - 3

ER -