Physiological basis for large differences in resistance to nitric among freshwater and freshwater-acclimated euryhaline fishes

Joseph R. Tomasso, Martin Grosell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Uptake of environmental NO2- by most freshwater fishes occurs at the gills where NO2- is actively transported into the blood by the Cl- uptake pathway. Some freshwater fishes do not concentrate NO2- in their plasma, regardless of environmental NO2- exposure and exhibit a high degree of resistance to NO2-. Recent studies indicate that freshwater-adapted killifish (Fundulidae: Fundulus heteroclitus) and European eel (Anguillidae: Anguilla anguilla) have no or minimal Cl- uptake activity at the gills relative to most freshwater fishes; rather, Cl - requirements are met in other ways (probably dietary). We hypothesized that different rates of Cl- uptake by the gill may explain the observed differences in NO2- uptake and consequent toxicity among freshwater fishes. Cl- influx rates of channel catfish (lctaluridae: lctalurus punctatus), a species that concentrates NO2- in the plasma and is sensitive to NO2 -, and bluegill (Centrarchidae: Lepomis macrochirus), a species that does not concentrate NO2- in the plasma and is resistant to NO2-, were determined over a range of environmental Cl- concentrations. Channel catfish actively transported chloride into the plasma (Km = 155.6 ± 101.2 μmol/L Cl-; Jmax = 414.9 ± 51.4 nmol/g/h; ± SEM). In contrast, bluegill exhibited no observable Cl- uptake. We placed our results and previously reported results in a phylogenetic context and concluded that differences in Cl- uptake mechanisms among groups of freshwater fishes may explain, in large part, the wide range of sensitivity to environmental NO2-. NO2- uptake determinations may also prove to be an easy screening method when studying the phylogenetic distribution and nature of Cl- uptake mechanisms in the gills of fishes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-102
Number of pages5
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume39
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Fish
fish
Plasmas
plasma
phylogenetics
eel
Toxicity
Chlorides
Screening
Blood
blood
scanning electron microscopy
chloride
toxicity
Scanning electron microscopy
rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

@article{85794c4baa2e49bba85403fc0e5a517d,
title = "Physiological basis for large differences in resistance to nitric among freshwater and freshwater-acclimated euryhaline fishes",
abstract = "Uptake of environmental NO2- by most freshwater fishes occurs at the gills where NO2- is actively transported into the blood by the Cl- uptake pathway. Some freshwater fishes do not concentrate NO2- in their plasma, regardless of environmental NO2- exposure and exhibit a high degree of resistance to NO2-. Recent studies indicate that freshwater-adapted killifish (Fundulidae: Fundulus heteroclitus) and European eel (Anguillidae: Anguilla anguilla) have no or minimal Cl- uptake activity at the gills relative to most freshwater fishes; rather, Cl - requirements are met in other ways (probably dietary). We hypothesized that different rates of Cl- uptake by the gill may explain the observed differences in NO2- uptake and consequent toxicity among freshwater fishes. Cl- influx rates of channel catfish (lctaluridae: lctalurus punctatus), a species that concentrates NO2- in the plasma and is sensitive to NO2 -, and bluegill (Centrarchidae: Lepomis macrochirus), a species that does not concentrate NO2- in the plasma and is resistant to NO2-, were determined over a range of environmental Cl- concentrations. Channel catfish actively transported chloride into the plasma (Km = 155.6 ± 101.2 μmol/L Cl-; Jmax = 414.9 ± 51.4 nmol/g/h; ± SEM). In contrast, bluegill exhibited no observable Cl- uptake. We placed our results and previously reported results in a phylogenetic context and concluded that differences in Cl- uptake mechanisms among groups of freshwater fishes may explain, in large part, the wide range of sensitivity to environmental NO2-. NO2- uptake determinations may also prove to be an easy screening method when studying the phylogenetic distribution and nature of Cl- uptake mechanisms in the gills of fishes.",
author = "Tomasso, {Joseph R.} and Martin Grosell",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "98--102",
journal = "Environmental Science & Technology",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physiological basis for large differences in resistance to nitric among freshwater and freshwater-acclimated euryhaline fishes

AU - Tomasso, Joseph R.

AU - Grosell, Martin

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Uptake of environmental NO2- by most freshwater fishes occurs at the gills where NO2- is actively transported into the blood by the Cl- uptake pathway. Some freshwater fishes do not concentrate NO2- in their plasma, regardless of environmental NO2- exposure and exhibit a high degree of resistance to NO2-. Recent studies indicate that freshwater-adapted killifish (Fundulidae: Fundulus heteroclitus) and European eel (Anguillidae: Anguilla anguilla) have no or minimal Cl- uptake activity at the gills relative to most freshwater fishes; rather, Cl - requirements are met in other ways (probably dietary). We hypothesized that different rates of Cl- uptake by the gill may explain the observed differences in NO2- uptake and consequent toxicity among freshwater fishes. Cl- influx rates of channel catfish (lctaluridae: lctalurus punctatus), a species that concentrates NO2- in the plasma and is sensitive to NO2 -, and bluegill (Centrarchidae: Lepomis macrochirus), a species that does not concentrate NO2- in the plasma and is resistant to NO2-, were determined over a range of environmental Cl- concentrations. Channel catfish actively transported chloride into the plasma (Km = 155.6 ± 101.2 μmol/L Cl-; Jmax = 414.9 ± 51.4 nmol/g/h; ± SEM). In contrast, bluegill exhibited no observable Cl- uptake. We placed our results and previously reported results in a phylogenetic context and concluded that differences in Cl- uptake mechanisms among groups of freshwater fishes may explain, in large part, the wide range of sensitivity to environmental NO2-. NO2- uptake determinations may also prove to be an easy screening method when studying the phylogenetic distribution and nature of Cl- uptake mechanisms in the gills of fishes.

AB - Uptake of environmental NO2- by most freshwater fishes occurs at the gills where NO2- is actively transported into the blood by the Cl- uptake pathway. Some freshwater fishes do not concentrate NO2- in their plasma, regardless of environmental NO2- exposure and exhibit a high degree of resistance to NO2-. Recent studies indicate that freshwater-adapted killifish (Fundulidae: Fundulus heteroclitus) and European eel (Anguillidae: Anguilla anguilla) have no or minimal Cl- uptake activity at the gills relative to most freshwater fishes; rather, Cl - requirements are met in other ways (probably dietary). We hypothesized that different rates of Cl- uptake by the gill may explain the observed differences in NO2- uptake and consequent toxicity among freshwater fishes. Cl- influx rates of channel catfish (lctaluridae: lctalurus punctatus), a species that concentrates NO2- in the plasma and is sensitive to NO2 -, and bluegill (Centrarchidae: Lepomis macrochirus), a species that does not concentrate NO2- in the plasma and is resistant to NO2-, were determined over a range of environmental Cl- concentrations. Channel catfish actively transported chloride into the plasma (Km = 155.6 ± 101.2 μmol/L Cl-; Jmax = 414.9 ± 51.4 nmol/g/h; ± SEM). In contrast, bluegill exhibited no observable Cl- uptake. We placed our results and previously reported results in a phylogenetic context and concluded that differences in Cl- uptake mechanisms among groups of freshwater fishes may explain, in large part, the wide range of sensitivity to environmental NO2-. NO2- uptake determinations may also prove to be an easy screening method when studying the phylogenetic distribution and nature of Cl- uptake mechanisms in the gills of fishes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=11244272868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=11244272868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15667081

AN - SCOPUS:11244272868

VL - 39

SP - 98

EP - 102

JO - Environmental Science & Technology

JF - Environmental Science & Technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 1

ER -