Physical Exam Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Injury in High School Athletes: A Systematic Review

James A. Onate, Joshua S. Everhart, Daniel R. Clifton, Thomas Best, James R. Borchers, Ajit M.W. Chaudhari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: A stated goal of the preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) is to reduce musculoskeletal injury, yet the musculoskeletal portion of the PPE is reportedly of questionable use in assessing lower extremity injury risk in high school-aged athletes. The objectives of this study are: (1) identify clinical assessment tools demonstrated to effectively determine lower extremity injury risk in a prospective setting, and (2) critically assess the methodological quality of prospective lower extremity risk assessment studies that use these tools. Data Sources: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL, UptoDate, Google Scholar, Cochrane Reviews, and SportDiscus. Inclusion criteria were prospective injury risk assessment studies involving athletes primarily ages 13 to 19 that used screening methods that did not require highly specialized equipment. Methodological quality was evaluated with a modified physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale. Main Results: Nine studies were included. The mean modified PEDro score was 6.0/10 (SD, 1.5). Multidirectional balance (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; CI, 1.5-6.1; P < 0.05) and physical maturation status (P < 0.05) were predictive of overall injury risk, knee hyperextension was predictive of anterior cruciate ligament injury (OR, 5.0; CI, 1.2-18.4; P < 0.05), hip external:internal rotator strength ratio of patellofemoral pain syndrome (P 0.02), and foot posture index of ankle sprain (r-0.339, P 0.008). Conclusions: Minimal prospective evidence supports or refutes the use of the functional musculoskeletal exam portion of the current PPE to assess lower extremity injury risk in high school athletes. Limited evidence does support inclusion of multidirectional balance assessment and physical maturation status in a musculoskeletal exam as both are generalizable risk factors for lower extremity injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)435-444
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Athletes
Lower Extremity
Wounds and Injuries
Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
Odds Ratio
Ankle Injuries
Knee Injuries
Information Storage and Retrieval
Posture
PubMed
Hip
Foot
Databases
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • high school sports
  • injury risk assessment
  • lower extremity injury
  • Preparticipation exam

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Physical Exam Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Injury in High School Athletes : A Systematic Review. / Onate, James A.; Everhart, Joshua S.; Clifton, Daniel R.; Best, Thomas; Borchers, James R.; Chaudhari, Ajit M.W.

In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 6, 01.11.2016, p. 435-444.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Onate, James A. ; Everhart, Joshua S. ; Clifton, Daniel R. ; Best, Thomas ; Borchers, James R. ; Chaudhari, Ajit M.W. / Physical Exam Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Injury in High School Athletes : A Systematic Review. In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 26, No. 6. pp. 435-444.
@article{a597e3b451da41de952fbf78f379159f,
title = "Physical Exam Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Injury in High School Athletes: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "Objective: A stated goal of the preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) is to reduce musculoskeletal injury, yet the musculoskeletal portion of the PPE is reportedly of questionable use in assessing lower extremity injury risk in high school-aged athletes. The objectives of this study are: (1) identify clinical assessment tools demonstrated to effectively determine lower extremity injury risk in a prospective setting, and (2) critically assess the methodological quality of prospective lower extremity risk assessment studies that use these tools. Data Sources: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL, UptoDate, Google Scholar, Cochrane Reviews, and SportDiscus. Inclusion criteria were prospective injury risk assessment studies involving athletes primarily ages 13 to 19 that used screening methods that did not require highly specialized equipment. Methodological quality was evaluated with a modified physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale. Main Results: Nine studies were included. The mean modified PEDro score was 6.0/10 (SD, 1.5). Multidirectional balance (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; CI, 1.5-6.1; P < 0.05) and physical maturation status (P < 0.05) were predictive of overall injury risk, knee hyperextension was predictive of anterior cruciate ligament injury (OR, 5.0; CI, 1.2-18.4; P < 0.05), hip external:internal rotator strength ratio of patellofemoral pain syndrome (P 0.02), and foot posture index of ankle sprain (r-0.339, P 0.008). Conclusions: Minimal prospective evidence supports or refutes the use of the functional musculoskeletal exam portion of the current PPE to assess lower extremity injury risk in high school athletes. Limited evidence does support inclusion of multidirectional balance assessment and physical maturation status in a musculoskeletal exam as both are generalizable risk factors for lower extremity injury.",
keywords = "high school sports, injury risk assessment, lower extremity injury, Preparticipation exam",
author = "Onate, {James A.} and Everhart, {Joshua S.} and Clifton, {Daniel R.} and Thomas Best and Borchers, {James R.} and Chaudhari, {Ajit M.W.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/JSM.0000000000000284",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "435--444",
journal = "Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine",
issn = "1050-642X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physical Exam Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Injury in High School Athletes

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Onate, James A.

AU - Everhart, Joshua S.

AU - Clifton, Daniel R.

AU - Best, Thomas

AU - Borchers, James R.

AU - Chaudhari, Ajit M.W.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Objective: A stated goal of the preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) is to reduce musculoskeletal injury, yet the musculoskeletal portion of the PPE is reportedly of questionable use in assessing lower extremity injury risk in high school-aged athletes. The objectives of this study are: (1) identify clinical assessment tools demonstrated to effectively determine lower extremity injury risk in a prospective setting, and (2) critically assess the methodological quality of prospective lower extremity risk assessment studies that use these tools. Data Sources: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL, UptoDate, Google Scholar, Cochrane Reviews, and SportDiscus. Inclusion criteria were prospective injury risk assessment studies involving athletes primarily ages 13 to 19 that used screening methods that did not require highly specialized equipment. Methodological quality was evaluated with a modified physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale. Main Results: Nine studies were included. The mean modified PEDro score was 6.0/10 (SD, 1.5). Multidirectional balance (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; CI, 1.5-6.1; P < 0.05) and physical maturation status (P < 0.05) were predictive of overall injury risk, knee hyperextension was predictive of anterior cruciate ligament injury (OR, 5.0; CI, 1.2-18.4; P < 0.05), hip external:internal rotator strength ratio of patellofemoral pain syndrome (P 0.02), and foot posture index of ankle sprain (r-0.339, P 0.008). Conclusions: Minimal prospective evidence supports or refutes the use of the functional musculoskeletal exam portion of the current PPE to assess lower extremity injury risk in high school athletes. Limited evidence does support inclusion of multidirectional balance assessment and physical maturation status in a musculoskeletal exam as both are generalizable risk factors for lower extremity injury.

AB - Objective: A stated goal of the preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) is to reduce musculoskeletal injury, yet the musculoskeletal portion of the PPE is reportedly of questionable use in assessing lower extremity injury risk in high school-aged athletes. The objectives of this study are: (1) identify clinical assessment tools demonstrated to effectively determine lower extremity injury risk in a prospective setting, and (2) critically assess the methodological quality of prospective lower extremity risk assessment studies that use these tools. Data Sources: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL, UptoDate, Google Scholar, Cochrane Reviews, and SportDiscus. Inclusion criteria were prospective injury risk assessment studies involving athletes primarily ages 13 to 19 that used screening methods that did not require highly specialized equipment. Methodological quality was evaluated with a modified physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale. Main Results: Nine studies were included. The mean modified PEDro score was 6.0/10 (SD, 1.5). Multidirectional balance (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; CI, 1.5-6.1; P < 0.05) and physical maturation status (P < 0.05) were predictive of overall injury risk, knee hyperextension was predictive of anterior cruciate ligament injury (OR, 5.0; CI, 1.2-18.4; P < 0.05), hip external:internal rotator strength ratio of patellofemoral pain syndrome (P 0.02), and foot posture index of ankle sprain (r-0.339, P 0.008). Conclusions: Minimal prospective evidence supports or refutes the use of the functional musculoskeletal exam portion of the current PPE to assess lower extremity injury risk in high school athletes. Limited evidence does support inclusion of multidirectional balance assessment and physical maturation status in a musculoskeletal exam as both are generalizable risk factors for lower extremity injury.

KW - high school sports

KW - injury risk assessment

KW - lower extremity injury

KW - Preparticipation exam

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994703230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994703230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000284

DO - 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000284

M3 - Article

C2 - 26978166

AN - SCOPUS:84994703230

VL - 26

SP - 435

EP - 444

JO - Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

JF - Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

SN - 1050-642X

IS - 6

ER -