Phenotypic variability of patients homozygous for the GJB2 mutation 35delG cannot be explained by the influence of one major modifier gene

Nele Hilgert, Matthew J. Huentelman, Ashley Q. Thorburn, Erik Fransen, Nele Dieltjens, Malgorzata Mueller-Malesinska, Agnieszka Pollak, Agata Skorka, Jaroslaw Waligora, Rafal Ploski, Pierangela Castorina, Paola Primignani, Umberto Ambrosetti, Alessandra Murgia, Eva Orzan, Arti Pandya, Kathleen Arnos, Virginia Norris, Pavel Seeman, Petr JanousekDelphine Feldmann, Sandrine Marlin, Françoise Denoyelle, Carla J. Nishimura, Andreas Janecke, Doris Nekahm-Heis, Alessandro Martini, Elena Mennucci, Timea Tóth, Istvan Sziklai, Ignacio del Castillo, Felipe Moreno, Michael B. Petersen, Vasiliki Iliadou, Mustafa Tekin, Armagan Incesulu, Ewa Nowakowska, Jerzy Bal, Paul Van de Heyning, Anne Françoise Roux, Catherine Blanchet, Cyril Goizet, Guenaëlle Lancelot, Graça Fialho, Helena Caria, Xue Zhong Liu, Ouyang Xiaomei, Paul Govaerts, Karen Grønskov, Karianne Hostmark, Klemens Frei, Ingeborg Dhooge, Stephen Vlaeminck, Erdmute Kunstmann, Lut Van Laer, Richard J.H. Smith, Guy Van Camp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Hereditary hearing loss (HL) is a very heterogeneous trait, with 46 gene identifications for non-syndromic HL. Mutations in GJB2 cause up to half of all cases of severe-to-profound congenital autosomal recessive non-syndromic HL, with 35delG being the most frequent mutation in Caucasians. Although a genotype-phenotype correlation has been established for most GJB2 genotypes, the HL of 35delG homozygous patients is mild to profound. We hypothesise that this phenotypic variability is at least partly caused by the influence of modifier genes. By performing a whole-genome association (WGA) study on 35delG homozygotes, we sought to identify modifier genes. The association study was performed by comparing the genotypes of mild/moderate cases and profound cases. The first analysis included a pooling-based WGA study of a first set of 255 samples by using both the Illumina 550K and Affymetrix 500K chips. This analysis resulted in a ranking of all analysed single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) according to their P-values. The top 250 most significantly associated SNPs were genotyped individually in the same sample set. All 192 SNPs that still had significant P-values were genotyped in a second independent set of 297 samples for replication. The significant P-values were replicated in nine SNPs, with combined P-values between 3 × 10-3 and 1 × 10-4. This study suggests that the phenotypic variability in 35delG homozygous patients cannot be explained by the effect of one major modifier gene. Significantly associated SNPs may reflect a small modifying effect on the phenotype. Increasing the power of the study will be of greatest importance to confirm these results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)517-524
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Human Genetics
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Phenotypic variability of patients homozygous for the GJB2 mutation 35delG cannot be explained by the influence of one major modifier gene'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Hilgert, N., Huentelman, M. J., Thorburn, A. Q., Fransen, E., Dieltjens, N., Mueller-Malesinska, M., Pollak, A., Skorka, A., Waligora, J., Ploski, R., Castorina, P., Primignani, P., Ambrosetti, U., Murgia, A., Orzan, E., Pandya, A., Arnos, K., Norris, V., Seeman, P., ... Van Camp, G. (2009). Phenotypic variability of patients homozygous for the GJB2 mutation 35delG cannot be explained by the influence of one major modifier gene. European Journal of Human Genetics, 17(4), 517-524. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2008.201