TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of 2020 Real-Time Atlantic Hurricane Forecasts from High-Resolution Global-Nested Hurricane Models
T2 - HAFS-globalnest and GFDL T-SHiELD
AU - Hazelton, Andrew
AU - Gao, Kun
AU - Bender, Morris
AU - Cowan, Levi
AU - Alaka, Ghassan J.
AU - Kaltenbaugh, Alex
AU - Gramer, Lew
AU - Zhang, Xuejin
AU - Harris, Lucas
AU - Marchok, Timothy
AU - Morin, Matt
AU - Mehra, Avichal
AU - Zhang, Zhan
AU - Liu, Bin
AU - Marks, Frank
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments. The lead author was supported by NOAA Grant NA19OAR0220187. The authors thank Sim Aberson, John Kaplan, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments that improved an earlier version of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Meteorological Society.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - The global-nested Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS-globalnest) is one piece of NOAA’s Unified Forecast System (UFS) application for hurricanes. In this study, results are analyzed from 2020 real-time forecasts by HAFS-globalnest and a similar global-nested model, the Tropical Atlantic version of GFDL’s System for High-resolution prediction on Earth-to-Local Domains (T-SHiELD). HAFS-globalnest produced the highest track forecast skill compared to several operational and experimental models, while T-SHiELD showed promising track skills as well. The intensity forecasts from HAFS-globalnest generally had a positive bias at longer lead times primarily due to the lack of ocean coupling, while T-SHiELD had a much smaller intensity bias particularly at longer forecast lead times. With the introduction of a modified planetary boundary layer scheme and an increased number of vertical levels, particularly in the boundary layer, HAFS forecasts of storm size had a smaller positive bias than occurred in the 2019 version of HAFS-globalnest. Despite track forecasts that were comparable to the operational GFS and HWRF, both HAFS-globalnest and T-SHiELD suffered from a persistent right-of-track bias in several cases at the 4–5-day forecast lead times. The reasons for this bias were related to the strength of the subtropical ridge over the western North Atlantic and are continuing to be investigated and diagnosed. A few key case studies from this very active hurricane season, including Hurricanes Laura and Delta, were examined.
AB - The global-nested Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS-globalnest) is one piece of NOAA’s Unified Forecast System (UFS) application for hurricanes. In this study, results are analyzed from 2020 real-time forecasts by HAFS-globalnest and a similar global-nested model, the Tropical Atlantic version of GFDL’s System for High-resolution prediction on Earth-to-Local Domains (T-SHiELD). HAFS-globalnest produced the highest track forecast skill compared to several operational and experimental models, while T-SHiELD showed promising track skills as well. The intensity forecasts from HAFS-globalnest generally had a positive bias at longer lead times primarily due to the lack of ocean coupling, while T-SHiELD had a much smaller intensity bias particularly at longer forecast lead times. With the introduction of a modified planetary boundary layer scheme and an increased number of vertical levels, particularly in the boundary layer, HAFS forecasts of storm size had a smaller positive bias than occurred in the 2019 version of HAFS-globalnest. Despite track forecasts that were comparable to the operational GFS and HWRF, both HAFS-globalnest and T-SHiELD suffered from a persistent right-of-track bias in several cases at the 4–5-day forecast lead times. The reasons for this bias were related to the strength of the subtropical ridge over the western North Atlantic and are continuing to be investigated and diagnosed. A few key case studies from this very active hurricane season, including Hurricanes Laura and Delta, were examined.
KW - Forecast verification/skill
KW - Hurricanes/typhoons
KW - Numerical analysis/modeling
KW - S: Tropical cyclones
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125591557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125591557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1175/WAF-D-21-0102.1
DO - 10.1175/WAF-D-21-0102.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85125591557
VL - 37
SP - 143
EP - 161
JO - Weather and Forecasting
JF - Weather and Forecasting
SN - 0882-8156
IS - 1
ER -