Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Relationship Between Procedural Volume and Outcomes

Apurva O. Badheka, Sidakpal S. Panaich, Shilpkumar Arora, Nilay Patel, Nileshkumar J. Patel, Chirag Savani, Abhishek Deshmukh, Mauricio G. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an integral treatment modality for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) as well as chronic stable coronary artery disease (CAD) not responsive to optimal medical therapy. This coupled with studies on the feasibility and safety of performing PCI in centers without on-site surgical backup led to widespread growth of PCI centers. However, this has been accompanied by a recent steep decline in the volume of PCIs at both the operator and hospital level, which raises concerns regarding minimal procedural volumes required to maintain necessary skills and favorable clinical outcomes. The 2011 ACC/AHA/SCAI competency statement required PCI be performed by operators with a minimal procedural volume of >75 PCIs annually at high-volume centers with >400 PCIs per year, a number which was relaxed in the 2013 ACC/AHA/SCAI update to >50 PCIs/operator/year in hospitals with >200 PCIs annually to coincide with reduction in national PCI volume. Recent data suggests that many hospitals do not meet these thresholds. We review data on the importance of volume as a vital quality metric at both an operator and hospital level in determining procedural outcomes following PCI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number39
JournalCurrent Cardiology Reports
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016


  • Acute coronary syndromes
  • CAD
  • Operator volumes
  • Outcomes
  • PCI
  • Procedural volumes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Relationship Between Procedural Volume and Outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this