Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

Toshiki Kuno; Hiroki Ueyama; Sunil V. Rao; Mauricio G. Cohen; Jacqueline E. Tamis-Holland; Craig Thompson; Hisato Takagi; Sripal Bangalore

doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.001

Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

Toshiki Kuno, Hiroki Ueyama, Sunil V. Rao, Mauricio G. Cohen, Jacqueline E. Tamis-Holland, Craig Thompson, Hisato Takagi, Sripal Bangalore

Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

We aimed to investigate long-term (≥5 years) outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) using a meta-analysis from updated published randomized trials. Our data showed that the risk of all-cause death as well as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke was similar between PCI and CABG, whereas PCI had significantly higher rates of repeat revascularization compared to CABG. Decisions for PCI versus CABG for LMCAD should be based on weighing the upfront morbidity and mortality risk of CABG with late risk of repeat revascularization with PCI and taking into consideration patient preference.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	9-10
Number of pages	2
Journal	American Heart Journal
Volume	227
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.001
State	Published - Sep 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.001

Cite this

Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for left main coronary artery disease : A meta-analysis of randomized trials. / Kuno, Toshiki; Ueyama, Hiroki; Rao, Sunil V.; Cohen, Mauricio G.; Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline E.; Thompson, Craig; Takagi, Hisato; Bangalore, Sripal.

In: American Heart Journal, Vol. 227, 09.2020, p. 9-10.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

@article{5ad1d1978d96478d9d079e560d232fb6,

title = "Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials",

abstract = "We aimed to investigate long-term (≥5 years) outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) using a meta-analysis from updated published randomized trials. Our data showed that the risk of all-cause death as well as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke was similar between PCI and CABG, whereas PCI had significantly higher rates of repeat revascularization compared to CABG. Decisions for PCI versus CABG for LMCAD should be based on weighing the upfront morbidity and mortality risk of CABG with late risk of repeat revascularization with PCI and taking into consideration patient preference.",

author = "Toshiki Kuno and Hiroki Ueyama and Rao, {Sunil V.} and Cohen, {Mauricio G.} and Tamis-Holland, {Jacqueline E.} and Craig Thompson and Hisato Takagi and Sripal Bangalore",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Elsevier Inc.",

year = "2020",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.001",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "227",

pages = "9--10",

journal = "American Heart Journal",

issn = "0002-8703",

publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for left main coronary artery disease

T2 - A meta-analysis of randomized trials

AU - Kuno, Toshiki

AU - Ueyama, Hiroki

AU - Rao, Sunil V.

AU - Cohen, Mauricio G.

AU - Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline E.

AU - Thompson, Craig

AU - Takagi, Hisato

AU - Bangalore, Sripal

PY - 2020/9

Y1 - 2020/9

N2 - We aimed to investigate long-term (≥5 years) outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) using a meta-analysis from updated published randomized trials. Our data showed that the risk of all-cause death as well as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke was similar between PCI and CABG, whereas PCI had significantly higher rates of repeat revascularization compared to CABG. Decisions for PCI versus CABG for LMCAD should be based on weighing the upfront morbidity and mortality risk of CABG with late risk of repeat revascularization with PCI and taking into consideration patient preference.

AB - We aimed to investigate long-term (≥5 years) outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) using a meta-analysis from updated published randomized trials. Our data showed that the risk of all-cause death as well as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke was similar between PCI and CABG, whereas PCI had significantly higher rates of repeat revascularization compared to CABG. Decisions for PCI versus CABG for LMCAD should be based on weighing the upfront morbidity and mortality risk of CABG with late risk of repeat revascularization with PCI and taking into consideration patient preference.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087371092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087371092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.001

M3 - Letter

C2 - 32640370

AN - SCOPUS:85087371092

VL - 227

SP - 9

EP - 10

JO - American Heart Journal

JF - American Heart Journal

SN - 0002-8703

ER -

Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this