Perceptual and conceptual variants of the oddity task as a predictor of learning disability

Daryl Greenfield, Marcia S. Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares LD and non-LD peers on eight variants of the oddity task. This study is part of a larger programmatic research effort aimed at the development of a screening test to detect preschool children who currently pass existing screening tests but, nonetheless, subsequently experience school failure. The theoretical orientation of this approach is to assess active, ongoing cognitive processing ability. The oddity task, which can be structured to assess such processing ability, was evaluated in the present study as a potential component of this screening test. Consistent with a priori predictions, the data resulted in strong group and developmental differences. Oddity performance increased over age, with the non-LD children performing consistently better than their LD peers at each age. Perceptual and conceptual factors were manipulated across the oddity variations, and both factors contributed to group differences. These results were discussed in relationship to early diagnosis and prognosis for learning disabilities that might result from deficiencies in abstract processing ability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-148
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 1986

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Learning Disorders
Preschool Children
Early Diagnosis
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Perceptual and conceptual variants of the oddity task as a predictor of learning disability. / Greenfield, Daryl; Scott, Marcia S.

In: Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.03.1986, p. 135-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f671bb5055364de6a9597d6ac98ac990,
title = "Perceptual and conceptual variants of the oddity task as a predictor of learning disability",
abstract = "This paper compares LD and non-LD peers on eight variants of the oddity task. This study is part of a larger programmatic research effort aimed at the development of a screening test to detect preschool children who currently pass existing screening tests but, nonetheless, subsequently experience school failure. The theoretical orientation of this approach is to assess active, ongoing cognitive processing ability. The oddity task, which can be structured to assess such processing ability, was evaluated in the present study as a potential component of this screening test. Consistent with a priori predictions, the data resulted in strong group and developmental differences. Oddity performance increased over age, with the non-LD children performing consistently better than their LD peers at each age. Perceptual and conceptual factors were manipulated across the oddity variations, and both factors contributed to group differences. These results were discussed in relationship to early diagnosis and prognosis for learning disabilities that might result from deficiencies in abstract processing ability.",
author = "Daryl Greenfield and Scott, {Marcia S.}",
year = "1986",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF00917229",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "135--148",
journal = "Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology",
issn = "0091-0627",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptual and conceptual variants of the oddity task as a predictor of learning disability

AU - Greenfield, Daryl

AU - Scott, Marcia S.

PY - 1986/3/1

Y1 - 1986/3/1

N2 - This paper compares LD and non-LD peers on eight variants of the oddity task. This study is part of a larger programmatic research effort aimed at the development of a screening test to detect preschool children who currently pass existing screening tests but, nonetheless, subsequently experience school failure. The theoretical orientation of this approach is to assess active, ongoing cognitive processing ability. The oddity task, which can be structured to assess such processing ability, was evaluated in the present study as a potential component of this screening test. Consistent with a priori predictions, the data resulted in strong group and developmental differences. Oddity performance increased over age, with the non-LD children performing consistently better than their LD peers at each age. Perceptual and conceptual factors were manipulated across the oddity variations, and both factors contributed to group differences. These results were discussed in relationship to early diagnosis and prognosis for learning disabilities that might result from deficiencies in abstract processing ability.

AB - This paper compares LD and non-LD peers on eight variants of the oddity task. This study is part of a larger programmatic research effort aimed at the development of a screening test to detect preschool children who currently pass existing screening tests but, nonetheless, subsequently experience school failure. The theoretical orientation of this approach is to assess active, ongoing cognitive processing ability. The oddity task, which can be structured to assess such processing ability, was evaluated in the present study as a potential component of this screening test. Consistent with a priori predictions, the data resulted in strong group and developmental differences. Oddity performance increased over age, with the non-LD children performing consistently better than their LD peers at each age. Perceptual and conceptual factors were manipulated across the oddity variations, and both factors contributed to group differences. These results were discussed in relationship to early diagnosis and prognosis for learning disabilities that might result from deficiencies in abstract processing ability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022638824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022638824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00917229

DO - 10.1007/BF00917229

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 135

EP - 148

JO - Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

JF - Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

SN - 0091-0627

IS - 1

ER -