Peer reviewing e-learning: Opportunities, challenges, and solutions

Jorge G. Ruiz, Chris Candler, Thomas A. Teasdale

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Peer review is the foundation of academic publication and a necessary step in the scrutiny of any scholarly work. Simply defined, peer review is the attentive, unbiased assessment of any scholarly work that is submitted for formal scrutiny.Although medical school faculty increasingly use technology in clinical teaching, e-learning materials are often not subjected to a rigorous peer review process. The authors contrast peer review of e-learning materials with that of print materials, describe peer review issues regarding e-learning materials, propose approaches to address the challenges of peer review of e-learning materials, and outline directions for refinement of the e-learning peer review process. At its core, the peer review of e-learning materials should not differ substantially from that of traditional manuscripts. However, e-learning introduces new demands that impel reviewers to consider aspects that are unique to educational technology, including pedagogy, format, usability, navigation, interactivity, delivery, ease of updating, distribution, and access. Four approaches are offered to ease the burden and improve the quality of e-learning peer review: develop peer review training, embrace multidisciplinary peer review, develop guidelines, and provide incentives and compensation. The authors conclude with suggestions about peer review research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)503-507
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume82
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Peer reviewing e-learning: Opportunities, challenges, and solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this