Peer reviewing e-learning: Opportunities, challenges, and solutions

Jorge G. Ruiz, Chris Candler, Thomas A. Teasdale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Peer review is the foundation of academic publication and a necessary step in the scrutiny of any scholarly work. Simply defined, peer review is the attentive, unbiased assessment of any scholarly work that is submitted for formal scrutiny.Although medical school faculty increasingly use technology in clinical teaching, e-learning materials are often not subjected to a rigorous peer review process. The authors contrast peer review of e-learning materials with that of print materials, describe peer review issues regarding e-learning materials, propose approaches to address the challenges of peer review of e-learning materials, and outline directions for refinement of the e-learning peer review process. At its core, the peer review of e-learning materials should not differ substantially from that of traditional manuscripts. However, e-learning introduces new demands that impel reviewers to consider aspects that are unique to educational technology, including pedagogy, format, usability, navigation, interactivity, delivery, ease of updating, distribution, and access. Four approaches are offered to ease the burden and improve the quality of e-learning peer review: develop peer review training, embrace multidisciplinary peer review, develop guidelines, and provide incentives and compensation. The authors conclude with suggestions about peer review research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)503-507
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume82
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Peer Review
peer review
electronic learning
Learning
Research Peer Review
Teaching
Educational Technology
Medical Faculties
Manuscripts
Medical Schools
interactive media
educational technology
Publications
Motivation
Guidelines
incentive
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Education

Cite this

Peer reviewing e-learning : Opportunities, challenges, and solutions. / Ruiz, Jorge G.; Candler, Chris; Teasdale, Thomas A.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 82, No. 5, 01.05.2007, p. 503-507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ruiz, Jorge G. ; Candler, Chris ; Teasdale, Thomas A. / Peer reviewing e-learning : Opportunities, challenges, and solutions. In: Academic Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 82, No. 5. pp. 503-507.
@article{813aed5e9d67455ba06b7f382a2274f1,
title = "Peer reviewing e-learning: Opportunities, challenges, and solutions",
abstract = "Peer review is the foundation of academic publication and a necessary step in the scrutiny of any scholarly work. Simply defined, peer review is the attentive, unbiased assessment of any scholarly work that is submitted for formal scrutiny.Although medical school faculty increasingly use technology in clinical teaching, e-learning materials are often not subjected to a rigorous peer review process. The authors contrast peer review of e-learning materials with that of print materials, describe peer review issues regarding e-learning materials, propose approaches to address the challenges of peer review of e-learning materials, and outline directions for refinement of the e-learning peer review process. At its core, the peer review of e-learning materials should not differ substantially from that of traditional manuscripts. However, e-learning introduces new demands that impel reviewers to consider aspects that are unique to educational technology, including pedagogy, format, usability, navigation, interactivity, delivery, ease of updating, distribution, and access. Four approaches are offered to ease the burden and improve the quality of e-learning peer review: develop peer review training, embrace multidisciplinary peer review, develop guidelines, and provide incentives and compensation. The authors conclude with suggestions about peer review research.",
author = "Ruiz, {Jorge G.} and Chris Candler and Teasdale, {Thomas A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e31803ead94",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "503--507",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peer reviewing e-learning

T2 - Opportunities, challenges, and solutions

AU - Ruiz, Jorge G.

AU - Candler, Chris

AU - Teasdale, Thomas A.

PY - 2007/5/1

Y1 - 2007/5/1

N2 - Peer review is the foundation of academic publication and a necessary step in the scrutiny of any scholarly work. Simply defined, peer review is the attentive, unbiased assessment of any scholarly work that is submitted for formal scrutiny.Although medical school faculty increasingly use technology in clinical teaching, e-learning materials are often not subjected to a rigorous peer review process. The authors contrast peer review of e-learning materials with that of print materials, describe peer review issues regarding e-learning materials, propose approaches to address the challenges of peer review of e-learning materials, and outline directions for refinement of the e-learning peer review process. At its core, the peer review of e-learning materials should not differ substantially from that of traditional manuscripts. However, e-learning introduces new demands that impel reviewers to consider aspects that are unique to educational technology, including pedagogy, format, usability, navigation, interactivity, delivery, ease of updating, distribution, and access. Four approaches are offered to ease the burden and improve the quality of e-learning peer review: develop peer review training, embrace multidisciplinary peer review, develop guidelines, and provide incentives and compensation. The authors conclude with suggestions about peer review research.

AB - Peer review is the foundation of academic publication and a necessary step in the scrutiny of any scholarly work. Simply defined, peer review is the attentive, unbiased assessment of any scholarly work that is submitted for formal scrutiny.Although medical school faculty increasingly use technology in clinical teaching, e-learning materials are often not subjected to a rigorous peer review process. The authors contrast peer review of e-learning materials with that of print materials, describe peer review issues regarding e-learning materials, propose approaches to address the challenges of peer review of e-learning materials, and outline directions for refinement of the e-learning peer review process. At its core, the peer review of e-learning materials should not differ substantially from that of traditional manuscripts. However, e-learning introduces new demands that impel reviewers to consider aspects that are unique to educational technology, including pedagogy, format, usability, navigation, interactivity, delivery, ease of updating, distribution, and access. Four approaches are offered to ease the burden and improve the quality of e-learning peer review: develop peer review training, embrace multidisciplinary peer review, develop guidelines, and provide incentives and compensation. The authors conclude with suggestions about peer review research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247637926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247637926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31803ead94

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31803ead94

M3 - Article

C2 - 17457075

AN - SCOPUS:34247637926

VL - 82

SP - 503

EP - 507

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 5

ER -