Paying it forward: Four-year analysis of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Mentoring Program

Tanya Zakrison, Travis M. Polk, Rachel Dixon, Akpofure P. Ekeh, Kirby R. Gross, Kimberly A. Davis, Stanley J. Kurek, Nicole A. Stassen, Mayur B. Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND Mentorship programs in surgery are used to overcome barriers to clinical and academic productivity, research success, and work-life balance. We sought to determine if the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) Mentoring Program has met its goals of fostering academic and personal growth in young acute care surgeons. METHODS We conducted a systematic program evaluation of EAST Mentoring Program's first 4 years. Demographic information was collected from EAST records, mentorship program applications, and mentee-mentor career development plans. We reviewed the career development plans for thematic commonalities and results of a structured, online questionnaire distributed since program inception. A mixed methods approach was used to better understand the program goals from both mentee and mentor perspectives, as well as attitudes and barriers regarding the perceived success of this career development program. RESULTS During 2012 to 2015, 65 mentoring dyads were paired and 60 completed the program. Of 184 surveys distributed, 108 were returned (57% response rate). Respondents were evenly distributed between mentees and mentors (53 vs. 55, p = 0.768). In participant surveys, mentoring relationships were viewed to focus on research (45%), "sticky situations" (e.g., communication, work-life balance) (27%), education (18%), or administrative issues (10%). Mentees were more focused on research and education versus mentors (74% vs. 50%; p = 0.040). Mentees felt that goals were "always" or "usually" met versus mentors (89% vs. 77%; p = 0.096). Two barriers to successful mentorship included time and communication, with most pairs communicating by email. Most respondents (91%) planned to continue the relationship beyond the EAST Mentoring Program and recommended the experience to colleagues. CONCLUSION Mentee satisfaction with the EAST Mentoring Program was high. Mentoring is a beneficial tool to promote success among EAST's young members, but differences exist between mentee and mentor perceptions. Revising communication expectations and time commitment to improve career development may help our young acute care surgeons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-169
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume83
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Mentors
Wounds and Injuries
Communication
Research
Education
Mentoring
Foster Home Care
Program Evaluation
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • acute care surgery
  • career development
  • Mentoring
  • trainees
  • trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Paying it forward : Four-year analysis of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Mentoring Program. / Zakrison, Tanya; Polk, Travis M.; Dixon, Rachel; Ekeh, Akpofure P.; Gross, Kirby R.; Davis, Kimberly A.; Kurek, Stanley J.; Stassen, Nicole A.; Patel, Mayur B.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 83, No. 1, 01.07.2017, p. 165-169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zakrison, Tanya ; Polk, Travis M. ; Dixon, Rachel ; Ekeh, Akpofure P. ; Gross, Kirby R. ; Davis, Kimberly A. ; Kurek, Stanley J. ; Stassen, Nicole A. ; Patel, Mayur B. / Paying it forward : Four-year analysis of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Mentoring Program. In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2017 ; Vol. 83, No. 1. pp. 165-169.
@article{12ea655838074ab2b8d333f9ea18862a,
title = "Paying it forward: Four-year analysis of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Mentoring Program",
abstract = "BACKGROUND Mentorship programs in surgery are used to overcome barriers to clinical and academic productivity, research success, and work-life balance. We sought to determine if the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) Mentoring Program has met its goals of fostering academic and personal growth in young acute care surgeons. METHODS We conducted a systematic program evaluation of EAST Mentoring Program's first 4 years. Demographic information was collected from EAST records, mentorship program applications, and mentee-mentor career development plans. We reviewed the career development plans for thematic commonalities and results of a structured, online questionnaire distributed since program inception. A mixed methods approach was used to better understand the program goals from both mentee and mentor perspectives, as well as attitudes and barriers regarding the perceived success of this career development program. RESULTS During 2012 to 2015, 65 mentoring dyads were paired and 60 completed the program. Of 184 surveys distributed, 108 were returned (57{\%} response rate). Respondents were evenly distributed between mentees and mentors (53 vs. 55, p = 0.768). In participant surveys, mentoring relationships were viewed to focus on research (45{\%}), {"}sticky situations{"} (e.g., communication, work-life balance) (27{\%}), education (18{\%}), or administrative issues (10{\%}). Mentees were more focused on research and education versus mentors (74{\%} vs. 50{\%}; p = 0.040). Mentees felt that goals were {"}always{"} or {"}usually{"} met versus mentors (89{\%} vs. 77{\%}; p = 0.096). Two barriers to successful mentorship included time and communication, with most pairs communicating by email. Most respondents (91{\%}) planned to continue the relationship beyond the EAST Mentoring Program and recommended the experience to colleagues. CONCLUSION Mentee satisfaction with the EAST Mentoring Program was high. Mentoring is a beneficial tool to promote success among EAST's young members, but differences exist between mentee and mentor perceptions. Revising communication expectations and time commitment to improve career development may help our young acute care surgeons.",
keywords = "acute care surgery, career development, Mentoring, trainees, trauma",
author = "Tanya Zakrison and Polk, {Travis M.} and Rachel Dixon and Ekeh, {Akpofure P.} and Gross, {Kirby R.} and Davis, {Kimberly A.} and Kurek, {Stanley J.} and Stassen, {Nicole A.} and Patel, {Mayur B.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0000000000001493",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "165--169",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paying it forward

T2 - Four-year analysis of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Mentoring Program

AU - Zakrison, Tanya

AU - Polk, Travis M.

AU - Dixon, Rachel

AU - Ekeh, Akpofure P.

AU - Gross, Kirby R.

AU - Davis, Kimberly A.

AU - Kurek, Stanley J.

AU - Stassen, Nicole A.

AU - Patel, Mayur B.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - BACKGROUND Mentorship programs in surgery are used to overcome barriers to clinical and academic productivity, research success, and work-life balance. We sought to determine if the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) Mentoring Program has met its goals of fostering academic and personal growth in young acute care surgeons. METHODS We conducted a systematic program evaluation of EAST Mentoring Program's first 4 years. Demographic information was collected from EAST records, mentorship program applications, and mentee-mentor career development plans. We reviewed the career development plans for thematic commonalities and results of a structured, online questionnaire distributed since program inception. A mixed methods approach was used to better understand the program goals from both mentee and mentor perspectives, as well as attitudes and barriers regarding the perceived success of this career development program. RESULTS During 2012 to 2015, 65 mentoring dyads were paired and 60 completed the program. Of 184 surveys distributed, 108 were returned (57% response rate). Respondents were evenly distributed between mentees and mentors (53 vs. 55, p = 0.768). In participant surveys, mentoring relationships were viewed to focus on research (45%), "sticky situations" (e.g., communication, work-life balance) (27%), education (18%), or administrative issues (10%). Mentees were more focused on research and education versus mentors (74% vs. 50%; p = 0.040). Mentees felt that goals were "always" or "usually" met versus mentors (89% vs. 77%; p = 0.096). Two barriers to successful mentorship included time and communication, with most pairs communicating by email. Most respondents (91%) planned to continue the relationship beyond the EAST Mentoring Program and recommended the experience to colleagues. CONCLUSION Mentee satisfaction with the EAST Mentoring Program was high. Mentoring is a beneficial tool to promote success among EAST's young members, but differences exist between mentee and mentor perceptions. Revising communication expectations and time commitment to improve career development may help our young acute care surgeons.

AB - BACKGROUND Mentorship programs in surgery are used to overcome barriers to clinical and academic productivity, research success, and work-life balance. We sought to determine if the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) Mentoring Program has met its goals of fostering academic and personal growth in young acute care surgeons. METHODS We conducted a systematic program evaluation of EAST Mentoring Program's first 4 years. Demographic information was collected from EAST records, mentorship program applications, and mentee-mentor career development plans. We reviewed the career development plans for thematic commonalities and results of a structured, online questionnaire distributed since program inception. A mixed methods approach was used to better understand the program goals from both mentee and mentor perspectives, as well as attitudes and barriers regarding the perceived success of this career development program. RESULTS During 2012 to 2015, 65 mentoring dyads were paired and 60 completed the program. Of 184 surveys distributed, 108 were returned (57% response rate). Respondents were evenly distributed between mentees and mentors (53 vs. 55, p = 0.768). In participant surveys, mentoring relationships were viewed to focus on research (45%), "sticky situations" (e.g., communication, work-life balance) (27%), education (18%), or administrative issues (10%). Mentees were more focused on research and education versus mentors (74% vs. 50%; p = 0.040). Mentees felt that goals were "always" or "usually" met versus mentors (89% vs. 77%; p = 0.096). Two barriers to successful mentorship included time and communication, with most pairs communicating by email. Most respondents (91%) planned to continue the relationship beyond the EAST Mentoring Program and recommended the experience to colleagues. CONCLUSION Mentee satisfaction with the EAST Mentoring Program was high. Mentoring is a beneficial tool to promote success among EAST's young members, but differences exist between mentee and mentor perceptions. Revising communication expectations and time commitment to improve career development may help our young acute care surgeons.

KW - acute care surgery

KW - career development

KW - Mentoring

KW - trainees

KW - trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024380282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024380282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000001493

DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000001493

M3 - Article

C2 - 28452871

AN - SCOPUS:85024380282

VL - 83

SP - 165

EP - 169

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -