Patterned sensory stimulation induces plasticity in reciprocal Ia inhibition in humans

Monica Perez, Edelle C. Field-Fote, Mary Kay Floeter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Training of spinal cord circuits using sensorimotor stimulation has been proposed as a strategy to improve movement after spinal injury. How sensory stimulation may lead to long-lasting changes is not well understood. We studied whether sensory stimulation might induce changes in the strength of a specific spinal interneuronal circuit: spinally mediated reciprocal Ia inhibition. In healthy humans, the strength of reciprocal inhibition between ankle flexor and extensor muscles was assessed before and after 30 min of peroneal nerve stimulation at motor threshold intensity. Three stimulation protocols were assessed: patterned nerve stimulation (10 pulses at 100 Hz every 1.5 sec), uniform nerve stimulation (one pulse every 150 msec), and combined stimulation of the peroneal nerve and the motor cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Short-latency reciprocal inhibition from ankle flexor to extensor muscles was measured by conditioning the soleus H-reflex with stimulation of the common peroneal nerve. The strength of the reciprocal inhibition was measured at baseline and for 20 min after each stimulation session. Patterned stimulation, with or without motor cortex stimulation, enhanced reciprocal inhibition for at least 5 min afterward. The uniform pattern of stimulation was ineffective. These results demonstrate the presence of short-term plasticity within spinal inhibitory circuits. We conclude that the pattern of sensory input is a crucial factor for inducing changes in the spinal circuit for reciprocal inhibition in humans. These findings may have implications for the use of repetitive patterned sensory stimulation in rehabilitative efforts to improve walking ability in patients with spinal injury.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2014-2018
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume23
Issue number6
StatePublished - Mar 15 2003

Fingerprint

Peroneal Nerve
Spinal Injuries
Motor Cortex
Ankle
H-Reflex
Muscles
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Walking
Spinal Cord

Keywords

  • H-reflex
  • Interneurons
  • Locomotion
  • Presynaptic inhibition
  • Spinal cord
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Patterned sensory stimulation induces plasticity in reciprocal Ia inhibition in humans. / Perez, Monica; Field-Fote, Edelle C.; Floeter, Mary Kay.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 23, No. 6, 15.03.2003, p. 2014-2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Perez, Monica ; Field-Fote, Edelle C. ; Floeter, Mary Kay. / Patterned sensory stimulation induces plasticity in reciprocal Ia inhibition in humans. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 2003 ; Vol. 23, No. 6. pp. 2014-2018.
@article{89ea049570d34a9e8b35d104ada55705,
title = "Patterned sensory stimulation induces plasticity in reciprocal Ia inhibition in humans",
abstract = "Training of spinal cord circuits using sensorimotor stimulation has been proposed as a strategy to improve movement after spinal injury. How sensory stimulation may lead to long-lasting changes is not well understood. We studied whether sensory stimulation might induce changes in the strength of a specific spinal interneuronal circuit: spinally mediated reciprocal Ia inhibition. In healthy humans, the strength of reciprocal inhibition between ankle flexor and extensor muscles was assessed before and after 30 min of peroneal nerve stimulation at motor threshold intensity. Three stimulation protocols were assessed: patterned nerve stimulation (10 pulses at 100 Hz every 1.5 sec), uniform nerve stimulation (one pulse every 150 msec), and combined stimulation of the peroneal nerve and the motor cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Short-latency reciprocal inhibition from ankle flexor to extensor muscles was measured by conditioning the soleus H-reflex with stimulation of the common peroneal nerve. The strength of the reciprocal inhibition was measured at baseline and for 20 min after each stimulation session. Patterned stimulation, with or without motor cortex stimulation, enhanced reciprocal inhibition for at least 5 min afterward. The uniform pattern of stimulation was ineffective. These results demonstrate the presence of short-term plasticity within spinal inhibitory circuits. We conclude that the pattern of sensory input is a crucial factor for inducing changes in the spinal circuit for reciprocal inhibition in humans. These findings may have implications for the use of repetitive patterned sensory stimulation in rehabilitative efforts to improve walking ability in patients with spinal injury.",
keywords = "H-reflex, Interneurons, Locomotion, Presynaptic inhibition, Spinal cord, Transcranial magnetic stimulation",
author = "Monica Perez and Field-Fote, {Edelle C.} and Floeter, {Mary Kay}",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
day = "15",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "2014--2018",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterned sensory stimulation induces plasticity in reciprocal Ia inhibition in humans

AU - Perez, Monica

AU - Field-Fote, Edelle C.

AU - Floeter, Mary Kay

PY - 2003/3/15

Y1 - 2003/3/15

N2 - Training of spinal cord circuits using sensorimotor stimulation has been proposed as a strategy to improve movement after spinal injury. How sensory stimulation may lead to long-lasting changes is not well understood. We studied whether sensory stimulation might induce changes in the strength of a specific spinal interneuronal circuit: spinally mediated reciprocal Ia inhibition. In healthy humans, the strength of reciprocal inhibition between ankle flexor and extensor muscles was assessed before and after 30 min of peroneal nerve stimulation at motor threshold intensity. Three stimulation protocols were assessed: patterned nerve stimulation (10 pulses at 100 Hz every 1.5 sec), uniform nerve stimulation (one pulse every 150 msec), and combined stimulation of the peroneal nerve and the motor cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Short-latency reciprocal inhibition from ankle flexor to extensor muscles was measured by conditioning the soleus H-reflex with stimulation of the common peroneal nerve. The strength of the reciprocal inhibition was measured at baseline and for 20 min after each stimulation session. Patterned stimulation, with or without motor cortex stimulation, enhanced reciprocal inhibition for at least 5 min afterward. The uniform pattern of stimulation was ineffective. These results demonstrate the presence of short-term plasticity within spinal inhibitory circuits. We conclude that the pattern of sensory input is a crucial factor for inducing changes in the spinal circuit for reciprocal inhibition in humans. These findings may have implications for the use of repetitive patterned sensory stimulation in rehabilitative efforts to improve walking ability in patients with spinal injury.

AB - Training of spinal cord circuits using sensorimotor stimulation has been proposed as a strategy to improve movement after spinal injury. How sensory stimulation may lead to long-lasting changes is not well understood. We studied whether sensory stimulation might induce changes in the strength of a specific spinal interneuronal circuit: spinally mediated reciprocal Ia inhibition. In healthy humans, the strength of reciprocal inhibition between ankle flexor and extensor muscles was assessed before and after 30 min of peroneal nerve stimulation at motor threshold intensity. Three stimulation protocols were assessed: patterned nerve stimulation (10 pulses at 100 Hz every 1.5 sec), uniform nerve stimulation (one pulse every 150 msec), and combined stimulation of the peroneal nerve and the motor cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Short-latency reciprocal inhibition from ankle flexor to extensor muscles was measured by conditioning the soleus H-reflex with stimulation of the common peroneal nerve. The strength of the reciprocal inhibition was measured at baseline and for 20 min after each stimulation session. Patterned stimulation, with or without motor cortex stimulation, enhanced reciprocal inhibition for at least 5 min afterward. The uniform pattern of stimulation was ineffective. These results demonstrate the presence of short-term plasticity within spinal inhibitory circuits. We conclude that the pattern of sensory input is a crucial factor for inducing changes in the spinal circuit for reciprocal inhibition in humans. These findings may have implications for the use of repetitive patterned sensory stimulation in rehabilitative efforts to improve walking ability in patients with spinal injury.

KW - H-reflex

KW - Interneurons

KW - Locomotion

KW - Presynaptic inhibition

KW - Spinal cord

KW - Transcranial magnetic stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037444546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037444546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 2014

EP - 2018

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 6

ER -