Patients’ prediction of their wound healing time

Luis J. Borda, Jose A. Jaller, Penelope J. Kallis, Flor E. MacQuhae, Ingrid Herskovitz, Joshua D. Fox, Katherine L. Baquerizo, Robert Kirsner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Understanding and managing patients’ expectations can help improve their adherence to treatment for chronic wounds; however, little is known concerning about their expectations regarding healing time. Recruited subjects were asked to predict how long their wounds would take to heal and their charts were reviewed to retrieve real time of healing. We recruited 100 subjects from which 77% have healed. Fifty-three subjects (68.8%) had a longer healing time than they predicted (underestimated), and 17 (22.1%) had a shorter healing time than they predicted (overestimated). Subjects with shorter wound duration history tended to predict shorter healing time than subjects with longer wound duration (p < 0.01). However, wound duration did not affect prediction accuracy (p = 0.65). Subjects with chronic wounds seem more often to underestimate their time of healing. Wound duration significantly influenced patients’ prediction time, although it did not make their prediction more accurate. Patient education about expectations may be important as patients often expect their wounds to heal faster than they actually do.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalWound Repair and Regeneration
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Wound Healing
Wounds and Injuries
Patient Education
History

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Dermatology

Cite this

Borda, L. J., Jaller, J. A., Kallis, P. J., MacQuhae, F. E., Herskovitz, I., Fox, J. D., ... Kirsner, R. (Accepted/In press). Patients’ prediction of their wound healing time. Wound Repair and Regeneration. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12663

Patients’ prediction of their wound healing time. / Borda, Luis J.; Jaller, Jose A.; Kallis, Penelope J.; MacQuhae, Flor E.; Herskovitz, Ingrid; Fox, Joshua D.; Baquerizo, Katherine L.; Kirsner, Robert.

In: Wound Repair and Regeneration, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Borda, LJ, Jaller, JA, Kallis, PJ, MacQuhae, FE, Herskovitz, I, Fox, JD, Baquerizo, KL & Kirsner, R 2018, 'Patients’ prediction of their wound healing time', Wound Repair and Regeneration. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12663
Borda LJ, Jaller JA, Kallis PJ, MacQuhae FE, Herskovitz I, Fox JD et al. Patients’ prediction of their wound healing time. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2018 Jan 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12663
Borda, Luis J. ; Jaller, Jose A. ; Kallis, Penelope J. ; MacQuhae, Flor E. ; Herskovitz, Ingrid ; Fox, Joshua D. ; Baquerizo, Katherine L. ; Kirsner, Robert. / Patients’ prediction of their wound healing time. In: Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2018.
@article{1f797fbe79e8429fb5dc50377334fe59,
title = "Patients’ prediction of their wound healing time",
abstract = "Understanding and managing patients’ expectations can help improve their adherence to treatment for chronic wounds; however, little is known concerning about their expectations regarding healing time. Recruited subjects were asked to predict how long their wounds would take to heal and their charts were reviewed to retrieve real time of healing. We recruited 100 subjects from which 77{\%} have healed. Fifty-three subjects (68.8{\%}) had a longer healing time than they predicted (underestimated), and 17 (22.1{\%}) had a shorter healing time than they predicted (overestimated). Subjects with shorter wound duration history tended to predict shorter healing time than subjects with longer wound duration (p < 0.01). However, wound duration did not affect prediction accuracy (p = 0.65). Subjects with chronic wounds seem more often to underestimate their time of healing. Wound duration significantly influenced patients’ prediction time, although it did not make their prediction more accurate. Patient education about expectations may be important as patients often expect their wounds to heal faster than they actually do.",
author = "Borda, {Luis J.} and Jaller, {Jose A.} and Kallis, {Penelope J.} and MacQuhae, {Flor E.} and Ingrid Herskovitz and Fox, {Joshua D.} and Baquerizo, {Katherine L.} and Robert Kirsner",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/wrr.12663",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Wound Repair and Regeneration",
issn = "1067-1927",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients’ prediction of their wound healing time

AU - Borda, Luis J.

AU - Jaller, Jose A.

AU - Kallis, Penelope J.

AU - MacQuhae, Flor E.

AU - Herskovitz, Ingrid

AU - Fox, Joshua D.

AU - Baquerizo, Katherine L.

AU - Kirsner, Robert

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Understanding and managing patients’ expectations can help improve their adherence to treatment for chronic wounds; however, little is known concerning about their expectations regarding healing time. Recruited subjects were asked to predict how long their wounds would take to heal and their charts were reviewed to retrieve real time of healing. We recruited 100 subjects from which 77% have healed. Fifty-three subjects (68.8%) had a longer healing time than they predicted (underestimated), and 17 (22.1%) had a shorter healing time than they predicted (overestimated). Subjects with shorter wound duration history tended to predict shorter healing time than subjects with longer wound duration (p < 0.01). However, wound duration did not affect prediction accuracy (p = 0.65). Subjects with chronic wounds seem more often to underestimate their time of healing. Wound duration significantly influenced patients’ prediction time, although it did not make their prediction more accurate. Patient education about expectations may be important as patients often expect their wounds to heal faster than they actually do.

AB - Understanding and managing patients’ expectations can help improve their adherence to treatment for chronic wounds; however, little is known concerning about their expectations regarding healing time. Recruited subjects were asked to predict how long their wounds would take to heal and their charts were reviewed to retrieve real time of healing. We recruited 100 subjects from which 77% have healed. Fifty-three subjects (68.8%) had a longer healing time than they predicted (underestimated), and 17 (22.1%) had a shorter healing time than they predicted (overestimated). Subjects with shorter wound duration history tended to predict shorter healing time than subjects with longer wound duration (p < 0.01). However, wound duration did not affect prediction accuracy (p = 0.65). Subjects with chronic wounds seem more often to underestimate their time of healing. Wound duration significantly influenced patients’ prediction time, although it did not make their prediction more accurate. Patient education about expectations may be important as patients often expect their wounds to heal faster than they actually do.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055054971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055054971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/wrr.12663

DO - 10.1111/wrr.12663

M3 - Article

C2 - 30118164

AN - SCOPUS:85055054971

JO - Wound Repair and Regeneration

JF - Wound Repair and Regeneration

SN - 1067-1927

ER -