Patient safety begins with proper planning: A quantitative method to improve hospital design

David Birnbach, I. Nevo, S. R. Scheinman, M. Fitzpatrick, I. Shekhter, Joanna Lombard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background A quantitative methodology that enhances design of patient-safe healthcare facilities is presented. The prevailing paradigm of evaluating the design of healthcare facilities relies mainly on postconstruction criticism of design flaws; by then, design flaws may have already negatively affected patient safety. The methodology presented here utilises simulation-based testing in real-size replicas of proposed hospital designs. Other simulations to assess design solutions generated mainly qualitative data about user experience. To assess the methodology, we evaluated one patient safety variable in a proposed hospital patient room. Method Fifty-two physicians who volunteered to participate were randomly assigned to examine a standardised patient in two hospital room settings using a replica of the proposed architectural plan; the two settings differed only by the placement of the alcohol-based hand-rub dispenser. The primary outcome was the hand hygiene compliance rate. Results When the dispenser was in clear view of the physicians as they observed the patient, 53.8% sanitised their hands. When the dispenser was not in their field of view (as in the original architectural plan), 11.5% sanitised their hands (p=0.0011). Based on these results, the final architectural plans were adjusted accordingly. Conclusion The methodology is an effective and relatively inexpensive means to quantitatively evaluate proposed solutions, which can then be implemented to build patient-safe healthcare facilities. It enables actual users to proactively identify patient safety hazards before construction begins.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)462-465
Number of pages4
JournalQuality and Safety in Health Care
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2010

Fingerprint

Hospital Design and Construction
Patient Safety
Hand
Delivery of Health Care
Facility Design and Construction
Hand Hygiene
Physicians
Patients' Rooms
Alcohols

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Patient safety begins with proper planning : A quantitative method to improve hospital design. / Birnbach, David; Nevo, I.; Scheinman, S. R.; Fitzpatrick, M.; Shekhter, I.; Lombard, Joanna.

In: Quality and Safety in Health Care, Vol. 19, No. 5, 01.10.2010, p. 462-465.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Birnbach, David ; Nevo, I. ; Scheinman, S. R. ; Fitzpatrick, M. ; Shekhter, I. ; Lombard, Joanna. / Patient safety begins with proper planning : A quantitative method to improve hospital design. In: Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 5. pp. 462-465.
@article{43822dca3599458cbd7cf07d80e124a7,
title = "Patient safety begins with proper planning: A quantitative method to improve hospital design",
abstract = "Background A quantitative methodology that enhances design of patient-safe healthcare facilities is presented. The prevailing paradigm of evaluating the design of healthcare facilities relies mainly on postconstruction criticism of design flaws; by then, design flaws may have already negatively affected patient safety. The methodology presented here utilises simulation-based testing in real-size replicas of proposed hospital designs. Other simulations to assess design solutions generated mainly qualitative data about user experience. To assess the methodology, we evaluated one patient safety variable in a proposed hospital patient room. Method Fifty-two physicians who volunteered to participate were randomly assigned to examine a standardised patient in two hospital room settings using a replica of the proposed architectural plan; the two settings differed only by the placement of the alcohol-based hand-rub dispenser. The primary outcome was the hand hygiene compliance rate. Results When the dispenser was in clear view of the physicians as they observed the patient, 53.8{\%} sanitised their hands. When the dispenser was not in their field of view (as in the original architectural plan), 11.5{\%} sanitised their hands (p=0.0011). Based on these results, the final architectural plans were adjusted accordingly. Conclusion The methodology is an effective and relatively inexpensive means to quantitatively evaluate proposed solutions, which can then be implemented to build patient-safe healthcare facilities. It enables actual users to proactively identify patient safety hazards before construction begins.",
author = "David Birnbach and I. Nevo and Scheinman, {S. R.} and M. Fitzpatrick and I. Shekhter and Joanna Lombard",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/qshc.2008.031013",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "462--465",
journal = "BMJ Quality and Safety",
issn = "2044-5415",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient safety begins with proper planning

T2 - A quantitative method to improve hospital design

AU - Birnbach, David

AU - Nevo, I.

AU - Scheinman, S. R.

AU - Fitzpatrick, M.

AU - Shekhter, I.

AU - Lombard, Joanna

PY - 2010/10/1

Y1 - 2010/10/1

N2 - Background A quantitative methodology that enhances design of patient-safe healthcare facilities is presented. The prevailing paradigm of evaluating the design of healthcare facilities relies mainly on postconstruction criticism of design flaws; by then, design flaws may have already negatively affected patient safety. The methodology presented here utilises simulation-based testing in real-size replicas of proposed hospital designs. Other simulations to assess design solutions generated mainly qualitative data about user experience. To assess the methodology, we evaluated one patient safety variable in a proposed hospital patient room. Method Fifty-two physicians who volunteered to participate were randomly assigned to examine a standardised patient in two hospital room settings using a replica of the proposed architectural plan; the two settings differed only by the placement of the alcohol-based hand-rub dispenser. The primary outcome was the hand hygiene compliance rate. Results When the dispenser was in clear view of the physicians as they observed the patient, 53.8% sanitised their hands. When the dispenser was not in their field of view (as in the original architectural plan), 11.5% sanitised their hands (p=0.0011). Based on these results, the final architectural plans were adjusted accordingly. Conclusion The methodology is an effective and relatively inexpensive means to quantitatively evaluate proposed solutions, which can then be implemented to build patient-safe healthcare facilities. It enables actual users to proactively identify patient safety hazards before construction begins.

AB - Background A quantitative methodology that enhances design of patient-safe healthcare facilities is presented. The prevailing paradigm of evaluating the design of healthcare facilities relies mainly on postconstruction criticism of design flaws; by then, design flaws may have already negatively affected patient safety. The methodology presented here utilises simulation-based testing in real-size replicas of proposed hospital designs. Other simulations to assess design solutions generated mainly qualitative data about user experience. To assess the methodology, we evaluated one patient safety variable in a proposed hospital patient room. Method Fifty-two physicians who volunteered to participate were randomly assigned to examine a standardised patient in two hospital room settings using a replica of the proposed architectural plan; the two settings differed only by the placement of the alcohol-based hand-rub dispenser. The primary outcome was the hand hygiene compliance rate. Results When the dispenser was in clear view of the physicians as they observed the patient, 53.8% sanitised their hands. When the dispenser was not in their field of view (as in the original architectural plan), 11.5% sanitised their hands (p=0.0011). Based on these results, the final architectural plans were adjusted accordingly. Conclusion The methodology is an effective and relatively inexpensive means to quantitatively evaluate proposed solutions, which can then be implemented to build patient-safe healthcare facilities. It enables actual users to proactively identify patient safety hazards before construction begins.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78249238482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78249238482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/qshc.2008.031013

DO - 10.1136/qshc.2008.031013

M3 - Article

C2 - 20584700

AN - SCOPUS:78249238482

VL - 19

SP - 462

EP - 465

JO - BMJ Quality and Safety

JF - BMJ Quality and Safety

SN - 2044-5415

IS - 5

ER -