Patient factors and their association with nonmelanoma skin cancer morbidity and the performance of self-skin exams a cross-sectional study

Kyle T. Amber, Romi Bloom, Mohammad Ali Yazdani Abyaneh, Leyre A. Falto-Aizpurua, Martha Viera, Martin N. Zaiac, Keyvan Nouri, Shasa Hu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Mohs micrographic surgery is widely utilized for the treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancers with the advantage of tissue sparing and higher cure rate. The preoperative tumor size and post-Mohs micrographic surgery defect size are useful surrogate measures of nonmelanoma skin cancer morbidity. The authors sought to evaluate whether gender, Hispanic ethnicity, socioeconomic status, sun-safe practices and self-skin exams affected tumor size and Mohs micrographic surgery defect size. They also investigated factors associated with self-skin exams. Design: A cross-sectional survey-based study. Setting: Two dermatologic surgery clinics - one academic-associated and the other private. Participants: Patients receiving Mohs surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancers. Measurements: Tumor size and Mohs defect size and their relationship to patient factors ascertained from a survey, as well as the number of patients performing self-skin exams. The authors used t-tests and analysis of variance to compare tumor and defect sizes for each patient factor. Chi-squared tests were used to determine the factors associated with self-skin exams performance. Results: Lower education was associated with greater head and face tumor area (95mm2 vs. 41mm2, P=0.019), but not Mohs micrographic surgery defect size. Other studied patient factors were not associated with an increased morbidity. Hispanics performed self-skin exams at a lower rate than non-Hispanics (27% vs. 46%, p=0.03). Conclusion: This study innovatively uses tumor and Mohs micrographic surgery defect area as a measure of morbidity, allowing for identification of populations at need for improved education and prevention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16-22
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology
Volume9
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Mohs Surgery
Skin Neoplasms
Cross-Sectional Studies
Morbidity
Skin
Neoplasms
Hispanic Americans
Dermatologic Surgical Procedures
Education
Solar System
Social Class
Analysis of Variance
Head
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Patient factors and their association with nonmelanoma skin cancer morbidity and the performance of self-skin exams a cross-sectional study. / Amber, Kyle T.; Bloom, Romi; Abyaneh, Mohammad Ali Yazdani; Falto-Aizpurua, Leyre A.; Viera, Martha; Zaiac, Martin N.; Nouri, Keyvan; Hu, Shasa.

In: Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, Vol. 9, No. 9, 01.09.2016, p. 16-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Amber, Kyle T. ; Bloom, Romi ; Abyaneh, Mohammad Ali Yazdani ; Falto-Aizpurua, Leyre A. ; Viera, Martha ; Zaiac, Martin N. ; Nouri, Keyvan ; Hu, Shasa. / Patient factors and their association with nonmelanoma skin cancer morbidity and the performance of self-skin exams a cross-sectional study. In: Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology. 2016 ; Vol. 9, No. 9. pp. 16-22.
@article{298def3d4c6d43b8a7aa416b032c9953,
title = "Patient factors and their association with nonmelanoma skin cancer morbidity and the performance of self-skin exams a cross-sectional study",
abstract = "Objective: Mohs micrographic surgery is widely utilized for the treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancers with the advantage of tissue sparing and higher cure rate. The preoperative tumor size and post-Mohs micrographic surgery defect size are useful surrogate measures of nonmelanoma skin cancer morbidity. The authors sought to evaluate whether gender, Hispanic ethnicity, socioeconomic status, sun-safe practices and self-skin exams affected tumor size and Mohs micrographic surgery defect size. They also investigated factors associated with self-skin exams. Design: A cross-sectional survey-based study. Setting: Two dermatologic surgery clinics - one academic-associated and the other private. Participants: Patients receiving Mohs surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancers. Measurements: Tumor size and Mohs defect size and their relationship to patient factors ascertained from a survey, as well as the number of patients performing self-skin exams. The authors used t-tests and analysis of variance to compare tumor and defect sizes for each patient factor. Chi-squared tests were used to determine the factors associated with self-skin exams performance. Results: Lower education was associated with greater head and face tumor area (95mm2 vs. 41mm2, P=0.019), but not Mohs micrographic surgery defect size. Other studied patient factors were not associated with an increased morbidity. Hispanics performed self-skin exams at a lower rate than non-Hispanics (27{\%} vs. 46{\%}, p=0.03). Conclusion: This study innovatively uses tumor and Mohs micrographic surgery defect area as a measure of morbidity, allowing for identification of populations at need for improved education and prevention.",
author = "Amber, {Kyle T.} and Romi Bloom and Abyaneh, {Mohammad Ali Yazdani} and Falto-Aizpurua, {Leyre A.} and Martha Viera and Zaiac, {Martin N.} and Keyvan Nouri and Shasa Hu",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "16--22",
journal = "Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology",
issn = "1941-2789",
publisher = "Matrix Medical Communications",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient factors and their association with nonmelanoma skin cancer morbidity and the performance of self-skin exams a cross-sectional study

AU - Amber, Kyle T.

AU - Bloom, Romi

AU - Abyaneh, Mohammad Ali Yazdani

AU - Falto-Aizpurua, Leyre A.

AU - Viera, Martha

AU - Zaiac, Martin N.

AU - Nouri, Keyvan

AU - Hu, Shasa

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Objective: Mohs micrographic surgery is widely utilized for the treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancers with the advantage of tissue sparing and higher cure rate. The preoperative tumor size and post-Mohs micrographic surgery defect size are useful surrogate measures of nonmelanoma skin cancer morbidity. The authors sought to evaluate whether gender, Hispanic ethnicity, socioeconomic status, sun-safe practices and self-skin exams affected tumor size and Mohs micrographic surgery defect size. They also investigated factors associated with self-skin exams. Design: A cross-sectional survey-based study. Setting: Two dermatologic surgery clinics - one academic-associated and the other private. Participants: Patients receiving Mohs surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancers. Measurements: Tumor size and Mohs defect size and their relationship to patient factors ascertained from a survey, as well as the number of patients performing self-skin exams. The authors used t-tests and analysis of variance to compare tumor and defect sizes for each patient factor. Chi-squared tests were used to determine the factors associated with self-skin exams performance. Results: Lower education was associated with greater head and face tumor area (95mm2 vs. 41mm2, P=0.019), but not Mohs micrographic surgery defect size. Other studied patient factors were not associated with an increased morbidity. Hispanics performed self-skin exams at a lower rate than non-Hispanics (27% vs. 46%, p=0.03). Conclusion: This study innovatively uses tumor and Mohs micrographic surgery defect area as a measure of morbidity, allowing for identification of populations at need for improved education and prevention.

AB - Objective: Mohs micrographic surgery is widely utilized for the treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancers with the advantage of tissue sparing and higher cure rate. The preoperative tumor size and post-Mohs micrographic surgery defect size are useful surrogate measures of nonmelanoma skin cancer morbidity. The authors sought to evaluate whether gender, Hispanic ethnicity, socioeconomic status, sun-safe practices and self-skin exams affected tumor size and Mohs micrographic surgery defect size. They also investigated factors associated with self-skin exams. Design: A cross-sectional survey-based study. Setting: Two dermatologic surgery clinics - one academic-associated and the other private. Participants: Patients receiving Mohs surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancers. Measurements: Tumor size and Mohs defect size and their relationship to patient factors ascertained from a survey, as well as the number of patients performing self-skin exams. The authors used t-tests and analysis of variance to compare tumor and defect sizes for each patient factor. Chi-squared tests were used to determine the factors associated with self-skin exams performance. Results: Lower education was associated with greater head and face tumor area (95mm2 vs. 41mm2, P=0.019), but not Mohs micrographic surgery defect size. Other studied patient factors were not associated with an increased morbidity. Hispanics performed self-skin exams at a lower rate than non-Hispanics (27% vs. 46%, p=0.03). Conclusion: This study innovatively uses tumor and Mohs micrographic surgery defect area as a measure of morbidity, allowing for identification of populations at need for improved education and prevention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989855411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989855411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84989855411

VL - 9

SP - 16

EP - 22

JO - Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology

JF - Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology

SN - 1941-2789

IS - 9

ER -