Paternalism and sentimentalism

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

It is sometimes thought that sentimentalism has a difficult philosophical time with issues of paternalism because it cannot invoke the idea of autonomy the way Kantians can when dealing with cases where paternalistic intervention for someone’s sake seems morally unjustified. But contemporary sentimentalism can, in fact, deal plausibly with the entire range of examples that preoccupy the literature on paternalism. Respect for others’ autonomy can be unpacked in terms of empathy with their ideas, fears, and aspirations, but there are times, as with children, when empathy with a larger future can justify, say, a parent’s overriding a child’s fear of doctors. The parent empathizes with the fear but their empathy with the child is more strongly engaged by what they see will happen if the child doesn’t go to the doctor’s. There are also examples involving adults where the Kantian thinks paternalistic intervention is unjustified, but where the sentimentalist can hold that paternalistic intervention with some adult can be justified in terms of respect understood as being fully empathic with that person. Sentimentalism can offer a quite intuitive view of the morality of paternalism that stands opposed to Kantian ideas in this area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages131-138
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)9781317326991
ISBN (Print)9781138956100
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Sentimentalism
Paternalism
Empathy
Immanuel Kant
Autonomy
Doctors
Morality
Person
Aspiration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Slote, M. (2018). Paternalism and sentimentalism. In The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism (pp. 131-138). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657080

Paternalism and sentimentalism. / Slote, Michael.

The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism. Taylor and Francis, 2018. p. 131-138.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Slote, M 2018, Paternalism and sentimentalism. in The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism. Taylor and Francis, pp. 131-138. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657080
Slote M. Paternalism and sentimentalism. In The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism. Taylor and Francis. 2018. p. 131-138 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657080
Slote, Michael. / Paternalism and sentimentalism. The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism. Taylor and Francis, 2018. pp. 131-138
@inbook{bca8c5520990449a8b9d8f3797153010,
title = "Paternalism and sentimentalism",
abstract = "It is sometimes thought that sentimentalism has a difficult philosophical time with issues of paternalism because it cannot invoke the idea of autonomy the way Kantians can when dealing with cases where paternalistic intervention for someone’s sake seems morally unjustified. But contemporary sentimentalism can, in fact, deal plausibly with the entire range of examples that preoccupy the literature on paternalism. Respect for others’ autonomy can be unpacked in terms of empathy with their ideas, fears, and aspirations, but there are times, as with children, when empathy with a larger future can justify, say, a parent’s overriding a child’s fear of doctors. The parent empathizes with the fear but their empathy with the child is more strongly engaged by what they see will happen if the child doesn’t go to the doctor’s. There are also examples involving adults where the Kantian thinks paternalistic intervention is unjustified, but where the sentimentalist can hold that paternalistic intervention with some adult can be justified in terms of respect understood as being fully empathic with that person. Sentimentalism can offer a quite intuitive view of the morality of paternalism that stands opposed to Kantian ideas in this area.",
author = "Michael Slote",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315657080",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781138956100",
pages = "131--138",
booktitle = "The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Paternalism and sentimentalism

AU - Slote, Michael

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - It is sometimes thought that sentimentalism has a difficult philosophical time with issues of paternalism because it cannot invoke the idea of autonomy the way Kantians can when dealing with cases where paternalistic intervention for someone’s sake seems morally unjustified. But contemporary sentimentalism can, in fact, deal plausibly with the entire range of examples that preoccupy the literature on paternalism. Respect for others’ autonomy can be unpacked in terms of empathy with their ideas, fears, and aspirations, but there are times, as with children, when empathy with a larger future can justify, say, a parent’s overriding a child’s fear of doctors. The parent empathizes with the fear but their empathy with the child is more strongly engaged by what they see will happen if the child doesn’t go to the doctor’s. There are also examples involving adults where the Kantian thinks paternalistic intervention is unjustified, but where the sentimentalist can hold that paternalistic intervention with some adult can be justified in terms of respect understood as being fully empathic with that person. Sentimentalism can offer a quite intuitive view of the morality of paternalism that stands opposed to Kantian ideas in this area.

AB - It is sometimes thought that sentimentalism has a difficult philosophical time with issues of paternalism because it cannot invoke the idea of autonomy the way Kantians can when dealing with cases where paternalistic intervention for someone’s sake seems morally unjustified. But contemporary sentimentalism can, in fact, deal plausibly with the entire range of examples that preoccupy the literature on paternalism. Respect for others’ autonomy can be unpacked in terms of empathy with their ideas, fears, and aspirations, but there are times, as with children, when empathy with a larger future can justify, say, a parent’s overriding a child’s fear of doctors. The parent empathizes with the fear but their empathy with the child is more strongly engaged by what they see will happen if the child doesn’t go to the doctor’s. There are also examples involving adults where the Kantian thinks paternalistic intervention is unjustified, but where the sentimentalist can hold that paternalistic intervention with some adult can be justified in terms of respect understood as being fully empathic with that person. Sentimentalism can offer a quite intuitive view of the morality of paternalism that stands opposed to Kantian ideas in this area.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044890063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044890063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315657080

DO - 10.4324/9781315657080

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138956100

SP - 131

EP - 138

BT - The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -