Passive sampling to capture spatial variability in PM10-2.5

Darrin K. Ott, Naresh Kumar, Thomas M. Peters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This work applied inexpensive passive sampling to measure airborne coarse particles with aerodynamic diameters between 2.5 and 10 μm (PM10-2.5) over three 7-day periods at 33 sites in a medium-sized Midwest City (Iowa City, IA). The number of sites and their locations were selected using an optimal sampling design that captured 95% of the total variance in PM10-2.5 as measured with real-time sampling equipment on a mobile sampling platform. Weekly averages of PM10-2.5 were 15.9 μg m-3 (coefficient of variation between sites, CV=23%), 17.9 μg m-3 (CV=24%), and 6.1 μg m-3 (CV=30%). ANOVA showed that these means were statistically different (p<0.001), and that the spatial variability plus random error accounted for 29% of the total variability. The maximum coefficient of divergence between sites-a relative measure of uniformity-ranged from 0.21 to 0.36. These values indicate that PM10-2.5 was heterogeneous even on the fine spatial resolution studied in this work (average distance between sites was 4.4 km). The spatial patterns of PM10-2.5 measured with the passive samplers closely matched with those of mobile mapping and corresponded with known coarse particle sources in the area. This work demonstrates that passive sampling coupled with effective sampling design may enhance our ability to assess exposure to PM10-2.5 at a local scale. Compared to exposure estimates made with data from centrally located, filter-based samplers, these highly spatially resolved estimates should reduce exposure misclassification errors in epidemiological studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)746-756
Number of pages11
JournalAtmospheric Environment
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sampling
sampling
sampler
Random errors
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
aerodynamics
Aerodynamics
spatial resolution
divergence
filter
exposure
city
particle

Keywords

  • Coarse particles
  • Exposure assessment
  • Particulate matter
  • PM
  • Spatial variability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Pollution

Cite this

Passive sampling to capture spatial variability in PM10-2.5. / Ott, Darrin K.; Kumar, Naresh; Peters, Thomas M.

In: Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 42, No. 4, 01.02.2008, p. 746-756.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ott, Darrin K. ; Kumar, Naresh ; Peters, Thomas M. / Passive sampling to capture spatial variability in PM10-2.5. In: Atmospheric Environment. 2008 ; Vol. 42, No. 4. pp. 746-756.
@article{b51be389a1454b2db9491a4b687c2656,
title = "Passive sampling to capture spatial variability in PM10-2.5",
abstract = "This work applied inexpensive passive sampling to measure airborne coarse particles with aerodynamic diameters between 2.5 and 10 μm (PM10-2.5) over three 7-day periods at 33 sites in a medium-sized Midwest City (Iowa City, IA). The number of sites and their locations were selected using an optimal sampling design that captured 95{\%} of the total variance in PM10-2.5 as measured with real-time sampling equipment on a mobile sampling platform. Weekly averages of PM10-2.5 were 15.9 μg m-3 (coefficient of variation between sites, CV=23{\%}), 17.9 μg m-3 (CV=24{\%}), and 6.1 μg m-3 (CV=30{\%}). ANOVA showed that these means were statistically different (p<0.001), and that the spatial variability plus random error accounted for 29{\%} of the total variability. The maximum coefficient of divergence between sites-a relative measure of uniformity-ranged from 0.21 to 0.36. These values indicate that PM10-2.5 was heterogeneous even on the fine spatial resolution studied in this work (average distance between sites was 4.4 km). The spatial patterns of PM10-2.5 measured with the passive samplers closely matched with those of mobile mapping and corresponded with known coarse particle sources in the area. This work demonstrates that passive sampling coupled with effective sampling design may enhance our ability to assess exposure to PM10-2.5 at a local scale. Compared to exposure estimates made with data from centrally located, filter-based samplers, these highly spatially resolved estimates should reduce exposure misclassification errors in epidemiological studies.",
keywords = "Coarse particles, Exposure assessment, Particulate matter, PM, Spatial variability",
author = "Ott, {Darrin K.} and Naresh Kumar and Peters, {Thomas M.}",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.058",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "746--756",
journal = "Atmospheric Environment",
issn = "1352-2310",
publisher = "Pergamon Press Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Passive sampling to capture spatial variability in PM10-2.5

AU - Ott, Darrin K.

AU - Kumar, Naresh

AU - Peters, Thomas M.

PY - 2008/2/1

Y1 - 2008/2/1

N2 - This work applied inexpensive passive sampling to measure airborne coarse particles with aerodynamic diameters between 2.5 and 10 μm (PM10-2.5) over three 7-day periods at 33 sites in a medium-sized Midwest City (Iowa City, IA). The number of sites and their locations were selected using an optimal sampling design that captured 95% of the total variance in PM10-2.5 as measured with real-time sampling equipment on a mobile sampling platform. Weekly averages of PM10-2.5 were 15.9 μg m-3 (coefficient of variation between sites, CV=23%), 17.9 μg m-3 (CV=24%), and 6.1 μg m-3 (CV=30%). ANOVA showed that these means were statistically different (p<0.001), and that the spatial variability plus random error accounted for 29% of the total variability. The maximum coefficient of divergence between sites-a relative measure of uniformity-ranged from 0.21 to 0.36. These values indicate that PM10-2.5 was heterogeneous even on the fine spatial resolution studied in this work (average distance between sites was 4.4 km). The spatial patterns of PM10-2.5 measured with the passive samplers closely matched with those of mobile mapping and corresponded with known coarse particle sources in the area. This work demonstrates that passive sampling coupled with effective sampling design may enhance our ability to assess exposure to PM10-2.5 at a local scale. Compared to exposure estimates made with data from centrally located, filter-based samplers, these highly spatially resolved estimates should reduce exposure misclassification errors in epidemiological studies.

AB - This work applied inexpensive passive sampling to measure airborne coarse particles with aerodynamic diameters between 2.5 and 10 μm (PM10-2.5) over three 7-day periods at 33 sites in a medium-sized Midwest City (Iowa City, IA). The number of sites and their locations were selected using an optimal sampling design that captured 95% of the total variance in PM10-2.5 as measured with real-time sampling equipment on a mobile sampling platform. Weekly averages of PM10-2.5 were 15.9 μg m-3 (coefficient of variation between sites, CV=23%), 17.9 μg m-3 (CV=24%), and 6.1 μg m-3 (CV=30%). ANOVA showed that these means were statistically different (p<0.001), and that the spatial variability plus random error accounted for 29% of the total variability. The maximum coefficient of divergence between sites-a relative measure of uniformity-ranged from 0.21 to 0.36. These values indicate that PM10-2.5 was heterogeneous even on the fine spatial resolution studied in this work (average distance between sites was 4.4 km). The spatial patterns of PM10-2.5 measured with the passive samplers closely matched with those of mobile mapping and corresponded with known coarse particle sources in the area. This work demonstrates that passive sampling coupled with effective sampling design may enhance our ability to assess exposure to PM10-2.5 at a local scale. Compared to exposure estimates made with data from centrally located, filter-based samplers, these highly spatially resolved estimates should reduce exposure misclassification errors in epidemiological studies.

KW - Coarse particles

KW - Exposure assessment

KW - Particulate matter

KW - PM

KW - Spatial variability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38649118851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38649118851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.058

DO - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.058

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38649118851

VL - 42

SP - 746

EP - 756

JO - Atmospheric Environment

JF - Atmospheric Environment

SN - 1352-2310

IS - 4

ER -