Party discipline and universalism: The case of budgeting in Berlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


Work on the US Congress has found that when partisan differences are strong, legislation tends to be passed by minimum winning coalitions. When partisanship is weak, Congress and its committees often rely on the norm of universalism or 'giving something to everyone' to pass legislation. Universalism in legislative voting is expected to lead to bloated or inefficient public spending. This article investigates whether these hypotheses about party discipline and universalism hold true outside the United States. A comparison of fiscal decision-making in local legislatures in eastern Berlin, where newly created political parties are weakly disciplined, and in western Berlin, where established party caucuses are highly disciplined, finds this is indeed the case. The article concludes by raising questions for future research on universalism and other post-communist legislatures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-62
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Legislative Studies
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Party discipline and universalism: The case of budgeting in Berlin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this