Participatory organizational change in community-based health and human services: From tokenism to political engagement

Kimberly D. Bess, Isaac Prilleltensky, Douglas D. Perkins, Leslie V. Collins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Community psychologists have long worked with community-based human service organizations to build participatory processes. These efforts largely aim at building participatory practices within the current individual-wellness paradigm of human services. To address collective wellness, human service organizations need to challenge their current paradigm, attend to the social justice needs of community, and engage community participation in a new way, and in doing so become more openly political. We use qualitative interviews, focus groups, organizational documents, and participant observation to present a comparative case study of two organizations involved in such a process through an action research project aimed at transforming the organizations' managerial and practice paradigm from one based on first-order, ameliorative change to one that promotes second-order, transformative change via strength-based approaches, primary prevention, empowerment and participation, and focuses on changing community conditions. Four participatory tensions or dialectics are discussed: passive versus active participation, partners versus clients, surplus powerlessness versus collective efficacy, and reflection/learning versus action/doing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)134-148
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Journal of Community Psychology
Volume43
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2009

Fingerprint

Organizational Innovation
organizational change
Health Services
Organizations
health
community
paradigm
participation
Health Services Research
Social Justice
Primary Prevention
Focus Groups
dialectics
qualitative interview
participant observation
psychologist
action research
social justice
Observation
Learning

Keywords

  • Action-research
  • Community-based organizations
  • Health and human service organizations
  • Nonprofit organizations
  • Participation
  • Power
  • Second-order change

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Applied Psychology
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Participatory organizational change in community-based health and human services : From tokenism to political engagement. / Bess, Kimberly D.; Prilleltensky, Isaac; Perkins, Douglas D.; Collins, Leslie V.

In: American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 43, No. 1-2, 01.03.2009, p. 134-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a3e8369bbc024f68827509bfcf5cc2ab,
title = "Participatory organizational change in community-based health and human services: From tokenism to political engagement",
abstract = "Community psychologists have long worked with community-based human service organizations to build participatory processes. These efforts largely aim at building participatory practices within the current individual-wellness paradigm of human services. To address collective wellness, human service organizations need to challenge their current paradigm, attend to the social justice needs of community, and engage community participation in a new way, and in doing so become more openly political. We use qualitative interviews, focus groups, organizational documents, and participant observation to present a comparative case study of two organizations involved in such a process through an action research project aimed at transforming the organizations' managerial and practice paradigm from one based on first-order, ameliorative change to one that promotes second-order, transformative change via strength-based approaches, primary prevention, empowerment and participation, and focuses on changing community conditions. Four participatory tensions or dialectics are discussed: passive versus active participation, partners versus clients, surplus powerlessness versus collective efficacy, and reflection/learning versus action/doing.",
keywords = "Action-research, Community-based organizations, Health and human service organizations, Nonprofit organizations, Participation, Power, Second-order change",
author = "Bess, {Kimberly D.} and Isaac Prilleltensky and Perkins, {Douglas D.} and Collins, {Leslie V.}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10464-008-9222-8",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "134--148",
journal = "American Journal of Community Psychology",
issn = "0091-0562",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participatory organizational change in community-based health and human services

T2 - From tokenism to political engagement

AU - Bess, Kimberly D.

AU - Prilleltensky, Isaac

AU - Perkins, Douglas D.

AU - Collins, Leslie V.

PY - 2009/3/1

Y1 - 2009/3/1

N2 - Community psychologists have long worked with community-based human service organizations to build participatory processes. These efforts largely aim at building participatory practices within the current individual-wellness paradigm of human services. To address collective wellness, human service organizations need to challenge their current paradigm, attend to the social justice needs of community, and engage community participation in a new way, and in doing so become more openly political. We use qualitative interviews, focus groups, organizational documents, and participant observation to present a comparative case study of two organizations involved in such a process through an action research project aimed at transforming the organizations' managerial and practice paradigm from one based on first-order, ameliorative change to one that promotes second-order, transformative change via strength-based approaches, primary prevention, empowerment and participation, and focuses on changing community conditions. Four participatory tensions or dialectics are discussed: passive versus active participation, partners versus clients, surplus powerlessness versus collective efficacy, and reflection/learning versus action/doing.

AB - Community psychologists have long worked with community-based human service organizations to build participatory processes. These efforts largely aim at building participatory practices within the current individual-wellness paradigm of human services. To address collective wellness, human service organizations need to challenge their current paradigm, attend to the social justice needs of community, and engage community participation in a new way, and in doing so become more openly political. We use qualitative interviews, focus groups, organizational documents, and participant observation to present a comparative case study of two organizations involved in such a process through an action research project aimed at transforming the organizations' managerial and practice paradigm from one based on first-order, ameliorative change to one that promotes second-order, transformative change via strength-based approaches, primary prevention, empowerment and participation, and focuses on changing community conditions. Four participatory tensions or dialectics are discussed: passive versus active participation, partners versus clients, surplus powerlessness versus collective efficacy, and reflection/learning versus action/doing.

KW - Action-research

KW - Community-based organizations

KW - Health and human service organizations

KW - Nonprofit organizations

KW - Participation

KW - Power

KW - Second-order change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349204492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349204492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10464-008-9222-8

DO - 10.1007/s10464-008-9222-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 19142722

AN - SCOPUS:67349204492

VL - 43

SP - 134

EP - 148

JO - American Journal of Community Psychology

JF - American Journal of Community Psychology

SN - 0091-0562

IS - 1-2

ER -