Participation in and impact of a depression care management program targeting low-income minority patients in an urban community-based clinic

John Ryan, Ushimbra Buford, Erika Arias, Isabel Alfonsin-Vittoria, Mark Fedders, Terri Jennings, William Grubb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background African American people experience disproportionately higher rates of chronic depression, and among those affected, the condition is less likely to be detected and treated than in non-Hispanic white people. Objective To address this disparity in our primary care clinic, we introduced a validated framework for detecting and managing depression. Methods Over a 5-year period, there were 146 patients diagnosed as having depression and enrolled in a depression care management program. We evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of that program using baseline and follow-up screening data from the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Results The mean baseline severity score of 20.60 was reduced to 15.89 at 6 months (P < 0.001) and to 16.62 at 12 months. Patients achieved their best score, a mean of 12.93, 10.14 months after baseline (P < 0.001). The last mean severity score, after 15.47 months, was 14.60, a significant difference compared with baseline (P < 0.001). Although baseline severity scores for both groups were similar (P = 0.534), patients who remained engaged with the program demonstrated better scores and achieved greater severity score reductions from baseline to the last measure (P < 0.001). This study did not find any differences between the sexes when comparing PHQ-9 scores at baseline (P = 0.074), 6 months (P = 0.303), and 12 months (P = 0.429) and best (P = 0.875) and last (P = 0.640) scores. Conclusions Most of the improvement was witnessed in the first 10 months of treatment. Patients with more medical comorbidities participated longer in the study than patients with fewer comorbidities. Further research could elicit the relationship between improvement in mental health and medical conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)778-790
Number of pages13
JournalClinical Therapeutics
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2014

Fingerprint

Depression
Comorbidity
Program Evaluation
Sex Characteristics
African Americans
Primary Health Care
Mental Health
Health
Research
Therapeutics
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • African American
  • care management
  • depression
  • minority
  • primary care
  • psychiatry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Participation in and impact of a depression care management program targeting low-income minority patients in an urban community-based clinic. / Ryan, John; Buford, Ushimbra; Arias, Erika; Alfonsin-Vittoria, Isabel; Fedders, Mark; Jennings, Terri; Grubb, William.

In: Clinical Therapeutics, Vol. 36, No. 5, 01.05.2014, p. 778-790.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ryan, John ; Buford, Ushimbra ; Arias, Erika ; Alfonsin-Vittoria, Isabel ; Fedders, Mark ; Jennings, Terri ; Grubb, William. / Participation in and impact of a depression care management program targeting low-income minority patients in an urban community-based clinic. In: Clinical Therapeutics. 2014 ; Vol. 36, No. 5. pp. 778-790.
@article{6c70140bce924e098580e698baf2709b,
title = "Participation in and impact of a depression care management program targeting low-income minority patients in an urban community-based clinic",
abstract = "Background African American people experience disproportionately higher rates of chronic depression, and among those affected, the condition is less likely to be detected and treated than in non-Hispanic white people. Objective To address this disparity in our primary care clinic, we introduced a validated framework for detecting and managing depression. Methods Over a 5-year period, there were 146 patients diagnosed as having depression and enrolled in a depression care management program. We evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of that program using baseline and follow-up screening data from the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Results The mean baseline severity score of 20.60 was reduced to 15.89 at 6 months (P < 0.001) and to 16.62 at 12 months. Patients achieved their best score, a mean of 12.93, 10.14 months after baseline (P < 0.001). The last mean severity score, after 15.47 months, was 14.60, a significant difference compared with baseline (P < 0.001). Although baseline severity scores for both groups were similar (P = 0.534), patients who remained engaged with the program demonstrated better scores and achieved greater severity score reductions from baseline to the last measure (P < 0.001). This study did not find any differences between the sexes when comparing PHQ-9 scores at baseline (P = 0.074), 6 months (P = 0.303), and 12 months (P = 0.429) and best (P = 0.875) and last (P = 0.640) scores. Conclusions Most of the improvement was witnessed in the first 10 months of treatment. Patients with more medical comorbidities participated longer in the study than patients with fewer comorbidities. Further research could elicit the relationship between improvement in mental health and medical conditions.",
keywords = "African American, care management, depression, minority, primary care, psychiatry",
author = "John Ryan and Ushimbra Buford and Erika Arias and Isabel Alfonsin-Vittoria and Mark Fedders and Terri Jennings and William Grubb",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.03.007",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "778--790",
journal = "Clinical Therapeutics",
issn = "0149-2918",
publisher = "Excerpta Medica",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participation in and impact of a depression care management program targeting low-income minority patients in an urban community-based clinic

AU - Ryan, John

AU - Buford, Ushimbra

AU - Arias, Erika

AU - Alfonsin-Vittoria, Isabel

AU - Fedders, Mark

AU - Jennings, Terri

AU - Grubb, William

PY - 2014/5/1

Y1 - 2014/5/1

N2 - Background African American people experience disproportionately higher rates of chronic depression, and among those affected, the condition is less likely to be detected and treated than in non-Hispanic white people. Objective To address this disparity in our primary care clinic, we introduced a validated framework for detecting and managing depression. Methods Over a 5-year period, there were 146 patients diagnosed as having depression and enrolled in a depression care management program. We evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of that program using baseline and follow-up screening data from the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Results The mean baseline severity score of 20.60 was reduced to 15.89 at 6 months (P < 0.001) and to 16.62 at 12 months. Patients achieved their best score, a mean of 12.93, 10.14 months after baseline (P < 0.001). The last mean severity score, after 15.47 months, was 14.60, a significant difference compared with baseline (P < 0.001). Although baseline severity scores for both groups were similar (P = 0.534), patients who remained engaged with the program demonstrated better scores and achieved greater severity score reductions from baseline to the last measure (P < 0.001). This study did not find any differences between the sexes when comparing PHQ-9 scores at baseline (P = 0.074), 6 months (P = 0.303), and 12 months (P = 0.429) and best (P = 0.875) and last (P = 0.640) scores. Conclusions Most of the improvement was witnessed in the first 10 months of treatment. Patients with more medical comorbidities participated longer in the study than patients with fewer comorbidities. Further research could elicit the relationship between improvement in mental health and medical conditions.

AB - Background African American people experience disproportionately higher rates of chronic depression, and among those affected, the condition is less likely to be detected and treated than in non-Hispanic white people. Objective To address this disparity in our primary care clinic, we introduced a validated framework for detecting and managing depression. Methods Over a 5-year period, there were 146 patients diagnosed as having depression and enrolled in a depression care management program. We evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of that program using baseline and follow-up screening data from the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Results The mean baseline severity score of 20.60 was reduced to 15.89 at 6 months (P < 0.001) and to 16.62 at 12 months. Patients achieved their best score, a mean of 12.93, 10.14 months after baseline (P < 0.001). The last mean severity score, after 15.47 months, was 14.60, a significant difference compared with baseline (P < 0.001). Although baseline severity scores for both groups were similar (P = 0.534), patients who remained engaged with the program demonstrated better scores and achieved greater severity score reductions from baseline to the last measure (P < 0.001). This study did not find any differences between the sexes when comparing PHQ-9 scores at baseline (P = 0.074), 6 months (P = 0.303), and 12 months (P = 0.429) and best (P = 0.875) and last (P = 0.640) scores. Conclusions Most of the improvement was witnessed in the first 10 months of treatment. Patients with more medical comorbidities participated longer in the study than patients with fewer comorbidities. Further research could elicit the relationship between improvement in mental health and medical conditions.

KW - African American

KW - care management

KW - depression

KW - minority

KW - primary care

KW - psychiatry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901442962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901442962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.03.007

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 778

EP - 790

JO - Clinical Therapeutics

JF - Clinical Therapeutics

SN - 0149-2918

IS - 5

ER -