Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for diabetic macular edema

Kristen L. Hartley, William E Smiddy, Harry W Flynn, Timothy G. Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate anatomic and visual acuity (VA) results of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME), and to review the literature on the topic. METHODS: Retrospective noncomparative case series of patients who underwent PPV with ILM peeling for diffuse DME between January 1, 2000, and December 1, 2005, performed by three surgeons at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute. Main outcome measures included pre- and postoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual acuity. Mean follow-up period was 8 months (range, 43 days-2 years). RESULTS: Twenty-four eyes of 23 patients meeting the criteria were evaluated. Duration of DME ranged from 1 to 93 months. Mean preoperative logMAR vision was 0.782 (range, 0.30-1.82). Mean logMAR visual acuity at final follow-up was 0.771 (range, 0.10-2.00). At last follow-up, 25% of eyes had ≥2 line increase in VA from baseline, 54% of eyes had no improvement in VA, and 21% of eyes had ≥2 line decrease in VA. Of 9 eyes with pre- and postoperative OCT, there was an overall reduction in central macular thickness of 141 μm at postoperative month 3 and 120 μm at last follow-up. Postoperative complications included progression of cataract in 6 (60%) of 10 phakic eyes, postoperative intraocular pressure ≥30 mmHg in 6 (24%) eyes, and postoperative vitreous hemorrhage in 2 (8%) eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Pars plana vitrectomy with ILM peeling was associated with a reduction in DME when measured by OCT in the majority of eyes, but visual acuity outcomes showed minimal improvement compared to baseline. These results suggest the efficacy of PPV with ILM peeling for eyes with DME has not been well established and should be reserved for therapy with selected cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)410-419
Number of pages10
JournalRetina
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2008

Fingerprint

Temazepam
Macular Edema
Vitrectomy
Membranes
Visual Acuity
Optical Coherence Tomography
Vitreous Hemorrhage
Postoperative Hemorrhage
Intraocular Pressure
Cataract
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Diabetic macular edema
  • Internal limiting membrane
  • Macular edema
  • Vitrectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for diabetic macular edema. / Hartley, Kristen L.; Smiddy, William E; Flynn, Harry W; Murray, Timothy G.

In: Retina, Vol. 28, No. 3, 01.03.2008, p. 410-419.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{82335e96021f414c86d7dca00bb72150,
title = "Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for diabetic macular edema",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate anatomic and visual acuity (VA) results of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME), and to review the literature on the topic. METHODS: Retrospective noncomparative case series of patients who underwent PPV with ILM peeling for diffuse DME between January 1, 2000, and December 1, 2005, performed by three surgeons at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute. Main outcome measures included pre- and postoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual acuity. Mean follow-up period was 8 months (range, 43 days-2 years). RESULTS: Twenty-four eyes of 23 patients meeting the criteria were evaluated. Duration of DME ranged from 1 to 93 months. Mean preoperative logMAR vision was 0.782 (range, 0.30-1.82). Mean logMAR visual acuity at final follow-up was 0.771 (range, 0.10-2.00). At last follow-up, 25{\%} of eyes had ≥2 line increase in VA from baseline, 54{\%} of eyes had no improvement in VA, and 21{\%} of eyes had ≥2 line decrease in VA. Of 9 eyes with pre- and postoperative OCT, there was an overall reduction in central macular thickness of 141 μm at postoperative month 3 and 120 μm at last follow-up. Postoperative complications included progression of cataract in 6 (60{\%}) of 10 phakic eyes, postoperative intraocular pressure ≥30 mmHg in 6 (24{\%}) eyes, and postoperative vitreous hemorrhage in 2 (8{\%}) eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Pars plana vitrectomy with ILM peeling was associated with a reduction in DME when measured by OCT in the majority of eyes, but visual acuity outcomes showed minimal improvement compared to baseline. These results suggest the efficacy of PPV with ILM peeling for eyes with DME has not been well established and should be reserved for therapy with selected cases.",
keywords = "Diabetic macular edema, Internal limiting membrane, Macular edema, Vitrectomy",
author = "Hartley, {Kristen L.} and Smiddy, {William E} and Flynn, {Harry W} and Murray, {Timothy G.}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/IAE.0b013e31816102f2",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "410--419",
journal = "Retina",
issn = "0275-004X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for diabetic macular edema

AU - Hartley, Kristen L.

AU - Smiddy, William E

AU - Flynn, Harry W

AU - Murray, Timothy G.

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate anatomic and visual acuity (VA) results of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME), and to review the literature on the topic. METHODS: Retrospective noncomparative case series of patients who underwent PPV with ILM peeling for diffuse DME between January 1, 2000, and December 1, 2005, performed by three surgeons at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute. Main outcome measures included pre- and postoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual acuity. Mean follow-up period was 8 months (range, 43 days-2 years). RESULTS: Twenty-four eyes of 23 patients meeting the criteria were evaluated. Duration of DME ranged from 1 to 93 months. Mean preoperative logMAR vision was 0.782 (range, 0.30-1.82). Mean logMAR visual acuity at final follow-up was 0.771 (range, 0.10-2.00). At last follow-up, 25% of eyes had ≥2 line increase in VA from baseline, 54% of eyes had no improvement in VA, and 21% of eyes had ≥2 line decrease in VA. Of 9 eyes with pre- and postoperative OCT, there was an overall reduction in central macular thickness of 141 μm at postoperative month 3 and 120 μm at last follow-up. Postoperative complications included progression of cataract in 6 (60%) of 10 phakic eyes, postoperative intraocular pressure ≥30 mmHg in 6 (24%) eyes, and postoperative vitreous hemorrhage in 2 (8%) eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Pars plana vitrectomy with ILM peeling was associated with a reduction in DME when measured by OCT in the majority of eyes, but visual acuity outcomes showed minimal improvement compared to baseline. These results suggest the efficacy of PPV with ILM peeling for eyes with DME has not been well established and should be reserved for therapy with selected cases.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate anatomic and visual acuity (VA) results of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME), and to review the literature on the topic. METHODS: Retrospective noncomparative case series of patients who underwent PPV with ILM peeling for diffuse DME between January 1, 2000, and December 1, 2005, performed by three surgeons at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute. Main outcome measures included pre- and postoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual acuity. Mean follow-up period was 8 months (range, 43 days-2 years). RESULTS: Twenty-four eyes of 23 patients meeting the criteria were evaluated. Duration of DME ranged from 1 to 93 months. Mean preoperative logMAR vision was 0.782 (range, 0.30-1.82). Mean logMAR visual acuity at final follow-up was 0.771 (range, 0.10-2.00). At last follow-up, 25% of eyes had ≥2 line increase in VA from baseline, 54% of eyes had no improvement in VA, and 21% of eyes had ≥2 line decrease in VA. Of 9 eyes with pre- and postoperative OCT, there was an overall reduction in central macular thickness of 141 μm at postoperative month 3 and 120 μm at last follow-up. Postoperative complications included progression of cataract in 6 (60%) of 10 phakic eyes, postoperative intraocular pressure ≥30 mmHg in 6 (24%) eyes, and postoperative vitreous hemorrhage in 2 (8%) eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Pars plana vitrectomy with ILM peeling was associated with a reduction in DME when measured by OCT in the majority of eyes, but visual acuity outcomes showed minimal improvement compared to baseline. These results suggest the efficacy of PPV with ILM peeling for eyes with DME has not been well established and should be reserved for therapy with selected cases.

KW - Diabetic macular edema

KW - Internal limiting membrane

KW - Macular edema

KW - Vitrectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40449092350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40449092350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31816102f2

DO - 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31816102f2

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 410

EP - 419

JO - Retina

JF - Retina

SN - 0275-004X

IS - 3

ER -