Paradox and Promise

MySpace, Facebook, and the Sociopolitics of Social Networking in the Writing Classroom

Gina Maranto, Matt Barton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article situates current theoretical, rhetorical, and ethical analyses of the net's most prominent social networking sites, MySpace and Facebook. It also discusses the implications of bringing these web sites into the classroom, comparing how students, teachers, and administrators use (and abuse) these spaces. Both MySpace and Facebook privilege a discourse based on the construction and representation of an identity. Rather than assert unique identities, these sites ask users to label and classify themselves according to many criteria, including age, religion, political leanings, hobbies, and interests. Users can then list others who share these labels or interests and request to "add them as friends." MySpace and Facebook emphasize categories and aspects of popular culture that teenagers find important. They remediate the traditions of high school for the Web and by doing so greatly extend their reach. Many writing instructors wonder how these sites can be used to teach writing. How users represent themselves online could help students understand postmodern logics of identity construction and political engagement. However, there are dangers for teachers who create their own profiles and add their students as "friends." Like chat and email, these forums undercut concepts of more conventional rhetorical spaces. They both contribute to and undermine student and faculty ethos, although students may not appreciate that their profiles might have a lasting negative impact. Despite the public nature of most profiles, users often denounce these "invasions" as blatant violations of their privacy. Perhaps teachers and scholars should work to protect the integrity of these spaces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-47
Number of pages12
JournalComputers and Composition
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

facebook
networking
Students
classroom
student
Labels
recreational activity
chat
political attitude
teacher
popular culture
logic
invasion
privilege
student teacher
privacy
integrity
Electronic mail
instructor
abuse

Keywords

  • ethics
  • Facebook
  • Myspace
  • profiles
  • social networking
  • Web 2.0

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Computer Science(all)

Cite this

Paradox and Promise : MySpace, Facebook, and the Sociopolitics of Social Networking in the Writing Classroom. / Maranto, Gina; Barton, Matt.

In: Computers and Composition, Vol. 27, No. 1, 03.2010, p. 36-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cceb999fa4c7439a8ca1fef5078ad1c4,
title = "Paradox and Promise: MySpace, Facebook, and the Sociopolitics of Social Networking in the Writing Classroom",
abstract = "This article situates current theoretical, rhetorical, and ethical analyses of the net's most prominent social networking sites, MySpace and Facebook. It also discusses the implications of bringing these web sites into the classroom, comparing how students, teachers, and administrators use (and abuse) these spaces. Both MySpace and Facebook privilege a discourse based on the construction and representation of an identity. Rather than assert unique identities, these sites ask users to label and classify themselves according to many criteria, including age, religion, political leanings, hobbies, and interests. Users can then list others who share these labels or interests and request to {"}add them as friends.{"} MySpace and Facebook emphasize categories and aspects of popular culture that teenagers find important. They remediate the traditions of high school for the Web and by doing so greatly extend their reach. Many writing instructors wonder how these sites can be used to teach writing. How users represent themselves online could help students understand postmodern logics of identity construction and political engagement. However, there are dangers for teachers who create their own profiles and add their students as {"}friends.{"} Like chat and email, these forums undercut concepts of more conventional rhetorical spaces. They both contribute to and undermine student and faculty ethos, although students may not appreciate that their profiles might have a lasting negative impact. Despite the public nature of most profiles, users often denounce these {"}invasions{"} as blatant violations of their privacy. Perhaps teachers and scholars should work to protect the integrity of these spaces.",
keywords = "ethics, Facebook, Myspace, profiles, social networking, Web 2.0",
author = "Gina Maranto and Matt Barton",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "36--47",
journal = "Computers and Composition",
issn = "8755-4615",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paradox and Promise

T2 - MySpace, Facebook, and the Sociopolitics of Social Networking in the Writing Classroom

AU - Maranto, Gina

AU - Barton, Matt

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - This article situates current theoretical, rhetorical, and ethical analyses of the net's most prominent social networking sites, MySpace and Facebook. It also discusses the implications of bringing these web sites into the classroom, comparing how students, teachers, and administrators use (and abuse) these spaces. Both MySpace and Facebook privilege a discourse based on the construction and representation of an identity. Rather than assert unique identities, these sites ask users to label and classify themselves according to many criteria, including age, religion, political leanings, hobbies, and interests. Users can then list others who share these labels or interests and request to "add them as friends." MySpace and Facebook emphasize categories and aspects of popular culture that teenagers find important. They remediate the traditions of high school for the Web and by doing so greatly extend their reach. Many writing instructors wonder how these sites can be used to teach writing. How users represent themselves online could help students understand postmodern logics of identity construction and political engagement. However, there are dangers for teachers who create their own profiles and add their students as "friends." Like chat and email, these forums undercut concepts of more conventional rhetorical spaces. They both contribute to and undermine student and faculty ethos, although students may not appreciate that their profiles might have a lasting negative impact. Despite the public nature of most profiles, users often denounce these "invasions" as blatant violations of their privacy. Perhaps teachers and scholars should work to protect the integrity of these spaces.

AB - This article situates current theoretical, rhetorical, and ethical analyses of the net's most prominent social networking sites, MySpace and Facebook. It also discusses the implications of bringing these web sites into the classroom, comparing how students, teachers, and administrators use (and abuse) these spaces. Both MySpace and Facebook privilege a discourse based on the construction and representation of an identity. Rather than assert unique identities, these sites ask users to label and classify themselves according to many criteria, including age, religion, political leanings, hobbies, and interests. Users can then list others who share these labels or interests and request to "add them as friends." MySpace and Facebook emphasize categories and aspects of popular culture that teenagers find important. They remediate the traditions of high school for the Web and by doing so greatly extend their reach. Many writing instructors wonder how these sites can be used to teach writing. How users represent themselves online could help students understand postmodern logics of identity construction and political engagement. However, there are dangers for teachers who create their own profiles and add their students as "friends." Like chat and email, these forums undercut concepts of more conventional rhetorical spaces. They both contribute to and undermine student and faculty ethos, although students may not appreciate that their profiles might have a lasting negative impact. Despite the public nature of most profiles, users often denounce these "invasions" as blatant violations of their privacy. Perhaps teachers and scholars should work to protect the integrity of these spaces.

KW - ethics

KW - Facebook

KW - Myspace

KW - profiles

KW - social networking

KW - Web 2.0

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77149161097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77149161097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.003

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 36

EP - 47

JO - Computers and Composition

JF - Computers and Composition

SN - 8755-4615

IS - 1

ER -