Panama revisited: Evolution of coastal management policy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A window of opportunity for integrated coastal management may exist in Panama at the beginning of the new century. The country emerged from a period of political instability in the 1990s and began the new century with full political control over its most important resource - the Panama Canal. A major institutional reorganization in the late 1990s merged a number of agencies with authority in the coastal and marine areas into the Panama Maritime Authority and expanded the responsibilities of the marine resource directorate to include marine and coastal resources. This reorganization occurred with the adoption of new legislation that clearly recognizes the importance of integrated coastal management (ICM). Concurrent with the formation of the Maritime Authority, the Legislature passed the General Environmental Law and created the National Environment Authority. Despite these positive developments, institutional change has been slow. Sectoral management of coastal resources continues. Interagency coordination remains deficient, and no formal coastal coordination mechanism exists. Legislation is contradictory and confusing, and the new laws only add to the confusion. As coastal environmental quality continues to degrade and conflicts between sectors increase, the marine and coastal directorate must strengthen its institutional role and take the initiative in the development of a meaningful ICM effort in Panama. This manuscript analyzes the evolution of Panamanian institutions and legal frameworks related to coastal areas and highlights themes that are ripe for future action.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-120
Number of pages30
JournalOcean and Coastal Management
Volume45
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

coastal zone management
Panama
legislation
governance
resource
laws and regulations
institutional development
political instability
marine resource
environmental quality
marine resources
environmental law
canal
Canals
policy
co-ordination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Panama revisited : Evolution of coastal management policy. / Suman, Daniel O.

In: Ocean and Coastal Management, Vol. 45, No. 2-3, 2002, p. 91-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cb033bd3972a4a1887089e9fd25739ef,
title = "Panama revisited: Evolution of coastal management policy",
abstract = "A window of opportunity for integrated coastal management may exist in Panama at the beginning of the new century. The country emerged from a period of political instability in the 1990s and began the new century with full political control over its most important resource - the Panama Canal. A major institutional reorganization in the late 1990s merged a number of agencies with authority in the coastal and marine areas into the Panama Maritime Authority and expanded the responsibilities of the marine resource directorate to include marine and coastal resources. This reorganization occurred with the adoption of new legislation that clearly recognizes the importance of integrated coastal management (ICM). Concurrent with the formation of the Maritime Authority, the Legislature passed the General Environmental Law and created the National Environment Authority. Despite these positive developments, institutional change has been slow. Sectoral management of coastal resources continues. Interagency coordination remains deficient, and no formal coastal coordination mechanism exists. Legislation is contradictory and confusing, and the new laws only add to the confusion. As coastal environmental quality continues to degrade and conflicts between sectors increase, the marine and coastal directorate must strengthen its institutional role and take the initiative in the development of a meaningful ICM effort in Panama. This manuscript analyzes the evolution of Panamanian institutions and legal frameworks related to coastal areas and highlights themes that are ripe for future action.",
author = "Suman, {Daniel O}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00050-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "91--120",
journal = "Ocean and Coastal Management",
issn = "0964-5691",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Panama revisited

T2 - Evolution of coastal management policy

AU - Suman, Daniel O

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - A window of opportunity for integrated coastal management may exist in Panama at the beginning of the new century. The country emerged from a period of political instability in the 1990s and began the new century with full political control over its most important resource - the Panama Canal. A major institutional reorganization in the late 1990s merged a number of agencies with authority in the coastal and marine areas into the Panama Maritime Authority and expanded the responsibilities of the marine resource directorate to include marine and coastal resources. This reorganization occurred with the adoption of new legislation that clearly recognizes the importance of integrated coastal management (ICM). Concurrent with the formation of the Maritime Authority, the Legislature passed the General Environmental Law and created the National Environment Authority. Despite these positive developments, institutional change has been slow. Sectoral management of coastal resources continues. Interagency coordination remains deficient, and no formal coastal coordination mechanism exists. Legislation is contradictory and confusing, and the new laws only add to the confusion. As coastal environmental quality continues to degrade and conflicts between sectors increase, the marine and coastal directorate must strengthen its institutional role and take the initiative in the development of a meaningful ICM effort in Panama. This manuscript analyzes the evolution of Panamanian institutions and legal frameworks related to coastal areas and highlights themes that are ripe for future action.

AB - A window of opportunity for integrated coastal management may exist in Panama at the beginning of the new century. The country emerged from a period of political instability in the 1990s and began the new century with full political control over its most important resource - the Panama Canal. A major institutional reorganization in the late 1990s merged a number of agencies with authority in the coastal and marine areas into the Panama Maritime Authority and expanded the responsibilities of the marine resource directorate to include marine and coastal resources. This reorganization occurred with the adoption of new legislation that clearly recognizes the importance of integrated coastal management (ICM). Concurrent with the formation of the Maritime Authority, the Legislature passed the General Environmental Law and created the National Environment Authority. Despite these positive developments, institutional change has been slow. Sectoral management of coastal resources continues. Interagency coordination remains deficient, and no formal coastal coordination mechanism exists. Legislation is contradictory and confusing, and the new laws only add to the confusion. As coastal environmental quality continues to degrade and conflicts between sectors increase, the marine and coastal directorate must strengthen its institutional role and take the initiative in the development of a meaningful ICM effort in Panama. This manuscript analyzes the evolution of Panamanian institutions and legal frameworks related to coastal areas and highlights themes that are ripe for future action.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036063261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036063261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00050-9

DO - 10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00050-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036063261

VL - 45

SP - 91

EP - 120

JO - Ocean and Coastal Management

JF - Ocean and Coastal Management

SN - 0964-5691

IS - 2-3

ER -