Pain after spinal cord injury: An evidence-based review for clinical practice and research - Report of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Spinal Cord Injury Measures Meeting

Thomas N. Bryce, Cecilia Norrbrink Budh, Diana D. Cardenas, Marcel Dijkers, Elizabeth Felix, Nanna B. Finnerup, Paul Kennedy, Thomas Lundeberg, J. Scott Richards, Diana H. Rintala, Philip Siddall, Eva Widerstrom-Noga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To examine the reliability, validity, sensitivity, and practicality of various outcome measures for pain after spinal cord injury (SCI), and to provide recommendations for specific measures for use in clinical trials. Data Sources: Relevant articles were obtained through a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed databases from inception through 2006. Study Selection: The authors performed literature searches to find articles containing data relevant to the reliability and validity of each pain outcome measure in SCI and selected non-SCI populations. Data Extraction: After reviewing the articles, an investigator extracted information utilizing a standard template. A second investigator reviewed the chosen articles and the extracted pertinent information to confirm the findings of the first investigator. Data Synthesis: Taking into consideration both the quantity and quality of the studies analyzed, judgments on reliability and validity of the measures were made by the two investigators. Based upon these judgments, recommendations were formulated for use of specific measures in future clinical trials. In addition, for a subset of measures a voting process by a larger group of SCI experts allowed formulation of recommendations including determining which measures should be incorporated into a minimal dataset of measures for clinical trials and which ones need revision and further validity and reliability testing before use. Conclusions: A 0-10 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is recommended as the outcome measure for pain intensity after SCI, while the 7-Point Guy/Farrar Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale is recommended as the outcome measure for global improvement in pain. The SF-36 single pain interference question and the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) or Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference items are recommended as the outcome measures for pain interference after SCI. Brush or cotton wool and at least one high-threshold von Frey filament are recommended to test mechanical allodynia/hyperalgesia while a Peltier-type thermotester is recommended to test thermal allodynia/hyperalgesia. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) or Bryce-Ragnarsson pain taxonomies are recommended for classification of pain after SCI, while the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) is recommended for measuring change in neuropathic pain and the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) for quantitating neuropathic and nociceptive pain discrimination.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)421-440
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Volume30
Issue number5
StatePublished - Dec 18 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Injuries
Pain
Hyperalgesia
Reproducibility of Results
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Neuralgia
Research Personnel
Clinical Trials
Rehabilitation Research
Nociceptive Pain
Equipment and Supplies
Wool
Information Storage and Retrieval
Pain Measurement
Politics
PubMed
MEDLINE
Signs and Symptoms
Databases
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Chronic
  • Classification
  • Neuropathic
  • Non-neuropathic
  • Pain
  • Pain scales
  • Reproducibility of results
  • Spinal cord injuries
  • Treatment outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Pain after spinal cord injury : An evidence-based review for clinical practice and research - Report of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Spinal Cord Injury Measures Meeting. / Bryce, Thomas N.; Budh, Cecilia Norrbrink; Cardenas, Diana D.; Dijkers, Marcel; Felix, Elizabeth; Finnerup, Nanna B.; Kennedy, Paul; Lundeberg, Thomas; Richards, J. Scott; Rintala, Diana H.; Siddall, Philip; Widerstrom-Noga, Eva.

In: Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 5, 18.12.2007, p. 421-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bryce, Thomas N. ; Budh, Cecilia Norrbrink ; Cardenas, Diana D. ; Dijkers, Marcel ; Felix, Elizabeth ; Finnerup, Nanna B. ; Kennedy, Paul ; Lundeberg, Thomas ; Richards, J. Scott ; Rintala, Diana H. ; Siddall, Philip ; Widerstrom-Noga, Eva. / Pain after spinal cord injury : An evidence-based review for clinical practice and research - Report of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Spinal Cord Injury Measures Meeting. In: Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 30, No. 5. pp. 421-440.
@article{74839bb387b241f6a3863da415d66487,
title = "Pain after spinal cord injury: An evidence-based review for clinical practice and research - Report of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Spinal Cord Injury Measures Meeting",
abstract = "Background/Objectives: To examine the reliability, validity, sensitivity, and practicality of various outcome measures for pain after spinal cord injury (SCI), and to provide recommendations for specific measures for use in clinical trials. Data Sources: Relevant articles were obtained through a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed databases from inception through 2006. Study Selection: The authors performed literature searches to find articles containing data relevant to the reliability and validity of each pain outcome measure in SCI and selected non-SCI populations. Data Extraction: After reviewing the articles, an investigator extracted information utilizing a standard template. A second investigator reviewed the chosen articles and the extracted pertinent information to confirm the findings of the first investigator. Data Synthesis: Taking into consideration both the quantity and quality of the studies analyzed, judgments on reliability and validity of the measures were made by the two investigators. Based upon these judgments, recommendations were formulated for use of specific measures in future clinical trials. In addition, for a subset of measures a voting process by a larger group of SCI experts allowed formulation of recommendations including determining which measures should be incorporated into a minimal dataset of measures for clinical trials and which ones need revision and further validity and reliability testing before use. Conclusions: A 0-10 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is recommended as the outcome measure for pain intensity after SCI, while the 7-Point Guy/Farrar Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale is recommended as the outcome measure for global improvement in pain. The SF-36 single pain interference question and the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) or Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference items are recommended as the outcome measures for pain interference after SCI. Brush or cotton wool and at least one high-threshold von Frey filament are recommended to test mechanical allodynia/hyperalgesia while a Peltier-type thermotester is recommended to test thermal allodynia/hyperalgesia. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) or Bryce-Ragnarsson pain taxonomies are recommended for classification of pain after SCI, while the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) is recommended for measuring change in neuropathic pain and the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) for quantitating neuropathic and nociceptive pain discrimination.",
keywords = "Chronic, Classification, Neuropathic, Non-neuropathic, Pain, Pain scales, Reproducibility of results, Spinal cord injuries, Treatment outcome",
author = "Bryce, {Thomas N.} and Budh, {Cecilia Norrbrink} and Cardenas, {Diana D.} and Marcel Dijkers and Elizabeth Felix and Finnerup, {Nanna B.} and Paul Kennedy and Thomas Lundeberg and Richards, {J. Scott} and Rintala, {Diana H.} and Philip Siddall and Eva Widerstrom-Noga",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "18",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "421--440",
journal = "Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine",
issn = "1079-0268",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pain after spinal cord injury

T2 - An evidence-based review for clinical practice and research - Report of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Spinal Cord Injury Measures Meeting

AU - Bryce, Thomas N.

AU - Budh, Cecilia Norrbrink

AU - Cardenas, Diana D.

AU - Dijkers, Marcel

AU - Felix, Elizabeth

AU - Finnerup, Nanna B.

AU - Kennedy, Paul

AU - Lundeberg, Thomas

AU - Richards, J. Scott

AU - Rintala, Diana H.

AU - Siddall, Philip

AU - Widerstrom-Noga, Eva

PY - 2007/12/18

Y1 - 2007/12/18

N2 - Background/Objectives: To examine the reliability, validity, sensitivity, and practicality of various outcome measures for pain after spinal cord injury (SCI), and to provide recommendations for specific measures for use in clinical trials. Data Sources: Relevant articles were obtained through a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed databases from inception through 2006. Study Selection: The authors performed literature searches to find articles containing data relevant to the reliability and validity of each pain outcome measure in SCI and selected non-SCI populations. Data Extraction: After reviewing the articles, an investigator extracted information utilizing a standard template. A second investigator reviewed the chosen articles and the extracted pertinent information to confirm the findings of the first investigator. Data Synthesis: Taking into consideration both the quantity and quality of the studies analyzed, judgments on reliability and validity of the measures were made by the two investigators. Based upon these judgments, recommendations were formulated for use of specific measures in future clinical trials. In addition, for a subset of measures a voting process by a larger group of SCI experts allowed formulation of recommendations including determining which measures should be incorporated into a minimal dataset of measures for clinical trials and which ones need revision and further validity and reliability testing before use. Conclusions: A 0-10 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is recommended as the outcome measure for pain intensity after SCI, while the 7-Point Guy/Farrar Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale is recommended as the outcome measure for global improvement in pain. The SF-36 single pain interference question and the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) or Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference items are recommended as the outcome measures for pain interference after SCI. Brush or cotton wool and at least one high-threshold von Frey filament are recommended to test mechanical allodynia/hyperalgesia while a Peltier-type thermotester is recommended to test thermal allodynia/hyperalgesia. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) or Bryce-Ragnarsson pain taxonomies are recommended for classification of pain after SCI, while the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) is recommended for measuring change in neuropathic pain and the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) for quantitating neuropathic and nociceptive pain discrimination.

AB - Background/Objectives: To examine the reliability, validity, sensitivity, and practicality of various outcome measures for pain after spinal cord injury (SCI), and to provide recommendations for specific measures for use in clinical trials. Data Sources: Relevant articles were obtained through a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed databases from inception through 2006. Study Selection: The authors performed literature searches to find articles containing data relevant to the reliability and validity of each pain outcome measure in SCI and selected non-SCI populations. Data Extraction: After reviewing the articles, an investigator extracted information utilizing a standard template. A second investigator reviewed the chosen articles and the extracted pertinent information to confirm the findings of the first investigator. Data Synthesis: Taking into consideration both the quantity and quality of the studies analyzed, judgments on reliability and validity of the measures were made by the two investigators. Based upon these judgments, recommendations were formulated for use of specific measures in future clinical trials. In addition, for a subset of measures a voting process by a larger group of SCI experts allowed formulation of recommendations including determining which measures should be incorporated into a minimal dataset of measures for clinical trials and which ones need revision and further validity and reliability testing before use. Conclusions: A 0-10 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is recommended as the outcome measure for pain intensity after SCI, while the 7-Point Guy/Farrar Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale is recommended as the outcome measure for global improvement in pain. The SF-36 single pain interference question and the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) or Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference items are recommended as the outcome measures for pain interference after SCI. Brush or cotton wool and at least one high-threshold von Frey filament are recommended to test mechanical allodynia/hyperalgesia while a Peltier-type thermotester is recommended to test thermal allodynia/hyperalgesia. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) or Bryce-Ragnarsson pain taxonomies are recommended for classification of pain after SCI, while the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) is recommended for measuring change in neuropathic pain and the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) for quantitating neuropathic and nociceptive pain discrimination.

KW - Chronic

KW - Classification

KW - Neuropathic

KW - Non-neuropathic

KW - Pain

KW - Pain scales

KW - Reproducibility of results

KW - Spinal cord injuries

KW - Treatment outcome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37049011833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37049011833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18092558

AN - SCOPUS:37049011833

VL - 30

SP - 421

EP - 440

JO - Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine

JF - Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine

SN - 1079-0268

IS - 5

ER -