OSSE quantitative assessment of rapid-response prestorm ocean surveys to improve coupled tropical cyclone prediction

G. R. Halliwell, M. Mehari, Lynn K Shay, Vassiliki H Kourafalou, H. Kang, H. S. Kim, J. Dong, R. Atlas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ocean fields that initialize coupled TC prediction models must accurately represent the dynamics of mesoscale features and the associated distribution of upper ocean temperature and salinity. They must also provide unbiased realizations of upper ocean heat content and stratification. Ocean Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) are performed for three storms: Isaac, 2012; Edouard, 2014; and Gonzalo, 2014. These OSSEs assess the impact of rapid-response prestorm ocean profile surveys on improving ocean model initialization. Two types of surveys are evaluated: airborne deployments of expendable profilers and deployments of in situ thermistor chains along lines intersecting predicted storm paths. Assimilation of the existing ocean observing system substantially constrains mesoscale structure in dynamical fields, primarily because of the four available altimeters. However, these observations only modestly constrain mesoscale structure and bias in upper ocean thermal fields. Adding rapid-response airborne surveys to these observing systems produces substantial additional correction in thermal fields, but minimal additional correction in dynamical fields. Without altimetry assimilation, rapid-response profiles produce large additional correction in both dynamical and thermal fields. Airborne CTDs sampling temperature and salinity over 1000 m versus XBTs sampling temperature over 400 m produce additional correction for dynamical fields, but not for upper ocean thermal fields. Airborne surveys are generally more effective than thermistor chain deployments because they can sample a larger area at higher horizontal resolution and because the latter only measures temperature over the upper ∼100 m. Both airborne profile surveys and thermistor chain deployments effectively reduce upper ocean thermal biases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5729-5748
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Volume122
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

cyclones
systems simulation
hurricanes
upper ocean
tropical cyclone
oceans
Thermistors
prediction
ocean
predictions
airborne survey
thermistors
simulation
heat
experiment
Experiments
Sampling
assimilation
salinity
Temperature

Keywords

  • ocean observations
  • ocean OSSE
  • TC intensity prediction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics
  • Oceanography
  • Forestry
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Soil Science
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Polymers and Plastics
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Palaeontology

Cite this

OSSE quantitative assessment of rapid-response prestorm ocean surveys to improve coupled tropical cyclone prediction. / Halliwell, G. R.; Mehari, M.; Shay, Lynn K; Kourafalou, Vassiliki H; Kang, H.; Kim, H. S.; Dong, J.; Atlas, R.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, Vol. 122, No. 7, 01.07.2017, p. 5729-5748.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1d5d22ad9953411fac3420013d8fcc25,
title = "OSSE quantitative assessment of rapid-response prestorm ocean surveys to improve coupled tropical cyclone prediction",
abstract = "Ocean fields that initialize coupled TC prediction models must accurately represent the dynamics of mesoscale features and the associated distribution of upper ocean temperature and salinity. They must also provide unbiased realizations of upper ocean heat content and stratification. Ocean Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) are performed for three storms: Isaac, 2012; Edouard, 2014; and Gonzalo, 2014. These OSSEs assess the impact of rapid-response prestorm ocean profile surveys on improving ocean model initialization. Two types of surveys are evaluated: airborne deployments of expendable profilers and deployments of in situ thermistor chains along lines intersecting predicted storm paths. Assimilation of the existing ocean observing system substantially constrains mesoscale structure in dynamical fields, primarily because of the four available altimeters. However, these observations only modestly constrain mesoscale structure and bias in upper ocean thermal fields. Adding rapid-response airborne surveys to these observing systems produces substantial additional correction in thermal fields, but minimal additional correction in dynamical fields. Without altimetry assimilation, rapid-response profiles produce large additional correction in both dynamical and thermal fields. Airborne CTDs sampling temperature and salinity over 1000 m versus XBTs sampling temperature over 400 m produce additional correction for dynamical fields, but not for upper ocean thermal fields. Airborne surveys are generally more effective than thermistor chain deployments because they can sample a larger area at higher horizontal resolution and because the latter only measures temperature over the upper ∼100 m. Both airborne profile surveys and thermistor chain deployments effectively reduce upper ocean thermal biases.",
keywords = "ocean observations, ocean OSSE, TC intensity prediction",
author = "Halliwell, {G. R.} and M. Mehari and Shay, {Lynn K} and Kourafalou, {Vassiliki H} and H. Kang and Kim, {H. S.} and J. Dong and R. Atlas",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/2017JC012760",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "5729--5748",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans",
issn = "2169-9275",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - OSSE quantitative assessment of rapid-response prestorm ocean surveys to improve coupled tropical cyclone prediction

AU - Halliwell, G. R.

AU - Mehari, M.

AU - Shay, Lynn K

AU - Kourafalou, Vassiliki H

AU - Kang, H.

AU - Kim, H. S.

AU - Dong, J.

AU - Atlas, R.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Ocean fields that initialize coupled TC prediction models must accurately represent the dynamics of mesoscale features and the associated distribution of upper ocean temperature and salinity. They must also provide unbiased realizations of upper ocean heat content and stratification. Ocean Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) are performed for three storms: Isaac, 2012; Edouard, 2014; and Gonzalo, 2014. These OSSEs assess the impact of rapid-response prestorm ocean profile surveys on improving ocean model initialization. Two types of surveys are evaluated: airborne deployments of expendable profilers and deployments of in situ thermistor chains along lines intersecting predicted storm paths. Assimilation of the existing ocean observing system substantially constrains mesoscale structure in dynamical fields, primarily because of the four available altimeters. However, these observations only modestly constrain mesoscale structure and bias in upper ocean thermal fields. Adding rapid-response airborne surveys to these observing systems produces substantial additional correction in thermal fields, but minimal additional correction in dynamical fields. Without altimetry assimilation, rapid-response profiles produce large additional correction in both dynamical and thermal fields. Airborne CTDs sampling temperature and salinity over 1000 m versus XBTs sampling temperature over 400 m produce additional correction for dynamical fields, but not for upper ocean thermal fields. Airborne surveys are generally more effective than thermistor chain deployments because they can sample a larger area at higher horizontal resolution and because the latter only measures temperature over the upper ∼100 m. Both airborne profile surveys and thermistor chain deployments effectively reduce upper ocean thermal biases.

AB - Ocean fields that initialize coupled TC prediction models must accurately represent the dynamics of mesoscale features and the associated distribution of upper ocean temperature and salinity. They must also provide unbiased realizations of upper ocean heat content and stratification. Ocean Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) are performed for three storms: Isaac, 2012; Edouard, 2014; and Gonzalo, 2014. These OSSEs assess the impact of rapid-response prestorm ocean profile surveys on improving ocean model initialization. Two types of surveys are evaluated: airborne deployments of expendable profilers and deployments of in situ thermistor chains along lines intersecting predicted storm paths. Assimilation of the existing ocean observing system substantially constrains mesoscale structure in dynamical fields, primarily because of the four available altimeters. However, these observations only modestly constrain mesoscale structure and bias in upper ocean thermal fields. Adding rapid-response airborne surveys to these observing systems produces substantial additional correction in thermal fields, but minimal additional correction in dynamical fields. Without altimetry assimilation, rapid-response profiles produce large additional correction in both dynamical and thermal fields. Airborne CTDs sampling temperature and salinity over 1000 m versus XBTs sampling temperature over 400 m produce additional correction for dynamical fields, but not for upper ocean thermal fields. Airborne surveys are generally more effective than thermistor chain deployments because they can sample a larger area at higher horizontal resolution and because the latter only measures temperature over the upper ∼100 m. Both airborne profile surveys and thermistor chain deployments effectively reduce upper ocean thermal biases.

KW - ocean observations

KW - ocean OSSE

KW - TC intensity prediction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024388590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024388590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2017JC012760

DO - 10.1002/2017JC012760

M3 - Article

VL - 122

SP - 5729

EP - 5748

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

SN - 2169-9275

IS - 7

ER -