Optimal Returns Policy under Demand Uncertainty

Haresh Gurnani, Arun Sharma, Dhruv Grewal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multiple categories of retail products suffer limited shelf life, demand uncertainty, and, in some cases, long lead times. To provide retailers with an incentive to increase the stocking quantity of such products, manufacturers may offer an option to return unsold items at wholesale or less than wholesale prices. This article extends the additive price-dependent demand model in three ways. First, partial returns are optimal for the manufacturer but do not induce higher stocking quantities compared with when the manufacturer offers no returns. Second, in terms of the effect of investment in demand-enhancing activities, when retailers invest, they set higher resale prices, but an optimal partial returns policy still does not induce higher stocking quantity, whereas when manufacturers invest, the optimal returns policy induces higher stocking quantity. Third, when the manufacturer and retailer have different expectations of demand uncertainty, the retailer's estimate influences the expected profits for both, whereas the manufacturer's estimate has a major impact on its profits only.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-147
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Retailing
Volume86
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Retailers
Demand uncertainty
Return policy
Profit
Shelf life
Incentives
Resale
Price-dependent demand
Lead time
Wholesale prices
Retail
Demand model

Keywords

  • Pricing
  • Quality/brand building investment
  • Retailing
  • Returns
  • Selling effort

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing

Cite this

Optimal Returns Policy under Demand Uncertainty. / Gurnani, Haresh; Sharma, Arun; Grewal, Dhruv.

In: Journal of Retailing, Vol. 86, No. 2, 06.2010, p. 137-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gurnani, Haresh ; Sharma, Arun ; Grewal, Dhruv. / Optimal Returns Policy under Demand Uncertainty. In: Journal of Retailing. 2010 ; Vol. 86, No. 2. pp. 137-147.
@article{f3c2103bda7646948e4d50589dfdf453,
title = "Optimal Returns Policy under Demand Uncertainty",
abstract = "Multiple categories of retail products suffer limited shelf life, demand uncertainty, and, in some cases, long lead times. To provide retailers with an incentive to increase the stocking quantity of such products, manufacturers may offer an option to return unsold items at wholesale or less than wholesale prices. This article extends the additive price-dependent demand model in three ways. First, partial returns are optimal for the manufacturer but do not induce higher stocking quantities compared with when the manufacturer offers no returns. Second, in terms of the effect of investment in demand-enhancing activities, when retailers invest, they set higher resale prices, but an optimal partial returns policy still does not induce higher stocking quantity, whereas when manufacturers invest, the optimal returns policy induces higher stocking quantity. Third, when the manufacturer and retailer have different expectations of demand uncertainty, the retailer's estimate influences the expected profits for both, whereas the manufacturer's estimate has a major impact on its profits only.",
keywords = "Pricing, Quality/brand building investment, Retailing, Returns, Selling effort",
author = "Haresh Gurnani and Arun Sharma and Dhruv Grewal",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jretai.2010.02.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "137--147",
journal = "Journal of Retailing",
issn = "0022-4359",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal Returns Policy under Demand Uncertainty

AU - Gurnani, Haresh

AU - Sharma, Arun

AU - Grewal, Dhruv

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Multiple categories of retail products suffer limited shelf life, demand uncertainty, and, in some cases, long lead times. To provide retailers with an incentive to increase the stocking quantity of such products, manufacturers may offer an option to return unsold items at wholesale or less than wholesale prices. This article extends the additive price-dependent demand model in three ways. First, partial returns are optimal for the manufacturer but do not induce higher stocking quantities compared with when the manufacturer offers no returns. Second, in terms of the effect of investment in demand-enhancing activities, when retailers invest, they set higher resale prices, but an optimal partial returns policy still does not induce higher stocking quantity, whereas when manufacturers invest, the optimal returns policy induces higher stocking quantity. Third, when the manufacturer and retailer have different expectations of demand uncertainty, the retailer's estimate influences the expected profits for both, whereas the manufacturer's estimate has a major impact on its profits only.

AB - Multiple categories of retail products suffer limited shelf life, demand uncertainty, and, in some cases, long lead times. To provide retailers with an incentive to increase the stocking quantity of such products, manufacturers may offer an option to return unsold items at wholesale or less than wholesale prices. This article extends the additive price-dependent demand model in three ways. First, partial returns are optimal for the manufacturer but do not induce higher stocking quantities compared with when the manufacturer offers no returns. Second, in terms of the effect of investment in demand-enhancing activities, when retailers invest, they set higher resale prices, but an optimal partial returns policy still does not induce higher stocking quantity, whereas when manufacturers invest, the optimal returns policy induces higher stocking quantity. Third, when the manufacturer and retailer have different expectations of demand uncertainty, the retailer's estimate influences the expected profits for both, whereas the manufacturer's estimate has a major impact on its profits only.

KW - Pricing

KW - Quality/brand building investment

KW - Retailing

KW - Returns

KW - Selling effort

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953615952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953615952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jretai.2010.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jretai.2010.02.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77953615952

VL - 86

SP - 137

EP - 147

JO - Journal of Retailing

JF - Journal of Retailing

SN - 0022-4359

IS - 2

ER -