Optical patient interface in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: Contact corneal applanation versus liquid immersion

Jonathan H. Talamo, Philip Gooding, David Angeley, William W Culbertson, Georg Schuele, Daniel Andersen, George Marcellino, Emma Essock-Burns, Juan Batlle, Rafael Feliz, Neil J. Friedman, Daniel Palanker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare 2 optical patient interface designs used for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Setting: Optimedica Corp., Santa Clara, California, USA, and Centro Laser, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. Design: Experimental and clinical studies. Methods: Laser capsulotomy was performed during cataract surgery with a curved contact lens interface (CCL) or a liquid optical immersion interface (LOI). The presence of corneal folds, incomplete capsulotomy, subconjunctival hemorrhage, and eye movement during laser treatment were analyzed using video and optical coherence tomography. The induced rise of intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured in porcine and cadaver eyes. Results: Corneal folds were identified in 70% of the CCL cohort; 63% of these had areas of incomplete capsulotomies beneath the corneal folds. No corneal folds or incomplete capsulotomies were identified in the LOI cohort. The mean eye movement during capsulotomy creation (1.5 sec) was 50 μm with a CCL and 20 μm with an LOI. The LOI cohort had 36% less subconjunctival hemorrhage than the CCL cohort. During suction, the mean IOP rise was 32.4 mm Hg ± 3.4 (SD) in the CCL group and 17.7 ± 2.1 mm Hg in the LOI group. Conclusions: Curved contact interfaces create corneal folds that can lead to incomplete capsulotomy during laser cataract surgery. A liquid interface eliminated corneal folds, improved globe stability, reduced subconjunctival hemorrhage, and lowered IOP rise. Financial Disclosure: Drs. Talamo, Culbertson, Batlle, Feliz, and Palanker are consultants to and Messrs. Gooding, Angeley, Schuele, Marcellino, and Andersen, and Ms. Essock-Burns are employees of Optimedica Corp., Sunnyvale, California, USA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)501-510
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2013

Fingerprint

Contact Lenses
Immersion
Cataract
Lasers
Intraocular Pressure
Hemorrhage
Eye Movements
Dominican Republic
Optical Coherence Tomography
Disclosure
Suction
Laser Therapy
Consultants
Burns
Cadaver
Research Design
Swine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Surgery

Cite this

Optical patient interface in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery : Contact corneal applanation versus liquid immersion. / Talamo, Jonathan H.; Gooding, Philip; Angeley, David; Culbertson, William W; Schuele, Georg; Andersen, Daniel; Marcellino, George; Essock-Burns, Emma; Batlle, Juan; Feliz, Rafael; Friedman, Neil J.; Palanker, Daniel.

In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Vol. 39, No. 4, 01.04.2013, p. 501-510.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Talamo, JH, Gooding, P, Angeley, D, Culbertson, WW, Schuele, G, Andersen, D, Marcellino, G, Essock-Burns, E, Batlle, J, Feliz, R, Friedman, NJ & Palanker, D 2013, 'Optical patient interface in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: Contact corneal applanation versus liquid immersion', Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 501-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.021
Talamo, Jonathan H. ; Gooding, Philip ; Angeley, David ; Culbertson, William W ; Schuele, Georg ; Andersen, Daniel ; Marcellino, George ; Essock-Burns, Emma ; Batlle, Juan ; Feliz, Rafael ; Friedman, Neil J. ; Palanker, Daniel. / Optical patient interface in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery : Contact corneal applanation versus liquid immersion. In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 501-510.
@article{3dc78cf631ac4243a80ff9ac72ec41d8,
title = "Optical patient interface in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: Contact corneal applanation versus liquid immersion",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare 2 optical patient interface designs used for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Setting: Optimedica Corp., Santa Clara, California, USA, and Centro Laser, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. Design: Experimental and clinical studies. Methods: Laser capsulotomy was performed during cataract surgery with a curved contact lens interface (CCL) or a liquid optical immersion interface (LOI). The presence of corneal folds, incomplete capsulotomy, subconjunctival hemorrhage, and eye movement during laser treatment were analyzed using video and optical coherence tomography. The induced rise of intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured in porcine and cadaver eyes. Results: Corneal folds were identified in 70{\%} of the CCL cohort; 63{\%} of these had areas of incomplete capsulotomies beneath the corneal folds. No corneal folds or incomplete capsulotomies were identified in the LOI cohort. The mean eye movement during capsulotomy creation (1.5 sec) was 50 μm with a CCL and 20 μm with an LOI. The LOI cohort had 36{\%} less subconjunctival hemorrhage than the CCL cohort. During suction, the mean IOP rise was 32.4 mm Hg ± 3.4 (SD) in the CCL group and 17.7 ± 2.1 mm Hg in the LOI group. Conclusions: Curved contact interfaces create corneal folds that can lead to incomplete capsulotomy during laser cataract surgery. A liquid interface eliminated corneal folds, improved globe stability, reduced subconjunctival hemorrhage, and lowered IOP rise. Financial Disclosure: Drs. Talamo, Culbertson, Batlle, Feliz, and Palanker are consultants to and Messrs. Gooding, Angeley, Schuele, Marcellino, and Andersen, and Ms. Essock-Burns are employees of Optimedica Corp., Sunnyvale, California, USA.",
author = "Talamo, {Jonathan H.} and Philip Gooding and David Angeley and Culbertson, {William W} and Georg Schuele and Daniel Andersen and George Marcellino and Emma Essock-Burns and Juan Batlle and Rafael Feliz and Friedman, {Neil J.} and Daniel Palanker",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.021",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "501--510",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optical patient interface in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery

T2 - Contact corneal applanation versus liquid immersion

AU - Talamo, Jonathan H.

AU - Gooding, Philip

AU - Angeley, David

AU - Culbertson, William W

AU - Schuele, Georg

AU - Andersen, Daniel

AU - Marcellino, George

AU - Essock-Burns, Emma

AU - Batlle, Juan

AU - Feliz, Rafael

AU - Friedman, Neil J.

AU - Palanker, Daniel

PY - 2013/4/1

Y1 - 2013/4/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare 2 optical patient interface designs used for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Setting: Optimedica Corp., Santa Clara, California, USA, and Centro Laser, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. Design: Experimental and clinical studies. Methods: Laser capsulotomy was performed during cataract surgery with a curved contact lens interface (CCL) or a liquid optical immersion interface (LOI). The presence of corneal folds, incomplete capsulotomy, subconjunctival hemorrhage, and eye movement during laser treatment were analyzed using video and optical coherence tomography. The induced rise of intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured in porcine and cadaver eyes. Results: Corneal folds were identified in 70% of the CCL cohort; 63% of these had areas of incomplete capsulotomies beneath the corneal folds. No corneal folds or incomplete capsulotomies were identified in the LOI cohort. The mean eye movement during capsulotomy creation (1.5 sec) was 50 μm with a CCL and 20 μm with an LOI. The LOI cohort had 36% less subconjunctival hemorrhage than the CCL cohort. During suction, the mean IOP rise was 32.4 mm Hg ± 3.4 (SD) in the CCL group and 17.7 ± 2.1 mm Hg in the LOI group. Conclusions: Curved contact interfaces create corneal folds that can lead to incomplete capsulotomy during laser cataract surgery. A liquid interface eliminated corneal folds, improved globe stability, reduced subconjunctival hemorrhage, and lowered IOP rise. Financial Disclosure: Drs. Talamo, Culbertson, Batlle, Feliz, and Palanker are consultants to and Messrs. Gooding, Angeley, Schuele, Marcellino, and Andersen, and Ms. Essock-Burns are employees of Optimedica Corp., Sunnyvale, California, USA.

AB - Purpose: To compare 2 optical patient interface designs used for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Setting: Optimedica Corp., Santa Clara, California, USA, and Centro Laser, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. Design: Experimental and clinical studies. Methods: Laser capsulotomy was performed during cataract surgery with a curved contact lens interface (CCL) or a liquid optical immersion interface (LOI). The presence of corneal folds, incomplete capsulotomy, subconjunctival hemorrhage, and eye movement during laser treatment were analyzed using video and optical coherence tomography. The induced rise of intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured in porcine and cadaver eyes. Results: Corneal folds were identified in 70% of the CCL cohort; 63% of these had areas of incomplete capsulotomies beneath the corneal folds. No corneal folds or incomplete capsulotomies were identified in the LOI cohort. The mean eye movement during capsulotomy creation (1.5 sec) was 50 μm with a CCL and 20 μm with an LOI. The LOI cohort had 36% less subconjunctival hemorrhage than the CCL cohort. During suction, the mean IOP rise was 32.4 mm Hg ± 3.4 (SD) in the CCL group and 17.7 ± 2.1 mm Hg in the LOI group. Conclusions: Curved contact interfaces create corneal folds that can lead to incomplete capsulotomy during laser cataract surgery. A liquid interface eliminated corneal folds, improved globe stability, reduced subconjunctival hemorrhage, and lowered IOP rise. Financial Disclosure: Drs. Talamo, Culbertson, Batlle, Feliz, and Palanker are consultants to and Messrs. Gooding, Angeley, Schuele, Marcellino, and Andersen, and Ms. Essock-Burns are employees of Optimedica Corp., Sunnyvale, California, USA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875447283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875447283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.021

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 23434216

AN - SCOPUS:84875447283

VL - 39

SP - 501

EP - 510

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 4

ER -