Operating room utilization alone is not an accurate metric for the allocation of operating room block time to individual surgeons with low caseloads

Franklin Dexter, Alex Macario, Rodney D. Traub, David Lubarsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Many surgical suites allocate operating room (OR) block time to individual surgeons. If block time is allocated to services/groups and yet the same surgeon invariably operates on the same weekday, for all practical purposes block time is being allocated to individual surgeons. Organizational conflict occurs when a surgeon with a relatively low OR utilization has his or her allocated block time reduced. The authors studied potential limitations affecting whether a facility can accurately estimate the average block time utilizations of individual surgeons performing low volumes of cases. Methods: Discrete-event computer simulation. Results: Neither 3 months nor 1 yr of historical data were enough to be able to identify surgeons who had persistently low average OR utilizations. For example, with 3 months of data, the widths of the 95% CIs for average OR utilization exceeded 10% for surgeons who had average raw utilizations of 83% or less. If during a 3-month period a surgeon's measured adjusted utilization is 65%, there is a 95% chance that the surgeon's average adjusted utilization is as low as 38% or as high as 83%. If two surgeons have measured adjusted utilizations of 65% and 80%, respectively, there is a 16% chance that they have the same average adjusted utilization. Average OR utilization can be estimated more precisely for surgeons performing more cases each week. Conclusions: Average OR utilization probably cannot be estimated precisely for low-volume surgeons based on 3 months or 1 yr of historical OR utilization data. The authors recommend that at surgical suites trying to allocate OR time to individual low-volume surgeons, OR allocations be based on criteria other than only OR utilization (e.g., based on OR efficiency).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1243-1249
Number of pages7
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume98
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2003

Fingerprint

Operating Rooms
Surgeons
Computer Simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Operating room utilization alone is not an accurate metric for the allocation of operating room block time to individual surgeons with low caseloads. / Dexter, Franklin; Macario, Alex; Traub, Rodney D.; Lubarsky, David.

In: Anesthesiology, Vol. 98, No. 5, 01.05.2003, p. 1243-1249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dexter, Franklin ; Macario, Alex ; Traub, Rodney D. ; Lubarsky, David. / Operating room utilization alone is not an accurate metric for the allocation of operating room block time to individual surgeons with low caseloads. In: Anesthesiology. 2003 ; Vol. 98, No. 5. pp. 1243-1249.
@article{5f708a14a93f4346a861f57267c92317,
title = "Operating room utilization alone is not an accurate metric for the allocation of operating room block time to individual surgeons with low caseloads",
abstract = "Introduction: Many surgical suites allocate operating room (OR) block time to individual surgeons. If block time is allocated to services/groups and yet the same surgeon invariably operates on the same weekday, for all practical purposes block time is being allocated to individual surgeons. Organizational conflict occurs when a surgeon with a relatively low OR utilization has his or her allocated block time reduced. The authors studied potential limitations affecting whether a facility can accurately estimate the average block time utilizations of individual surgeons performing low volumes of cases. Methods: Discrete-event computer simulation. Results: Neither 3 months nor 1 yr of historical data were enough to be able to identify surgeons who had persistently low average OR utilizations. For example, with 3 months of data, the widths of the 95{\%} CIs for average OR utilization exceeded 10{\%} for surgeons who had average raw utilizations of 83{\%} or less. If during a 3-month period a surgeon's measured adjusted utilization is 65{\%}, there is a 95{\%} chance that the surgeon's average adjusted utilization is as low as 38{\%} or as high as 83{\%}. If two surgeons have measured adjusted utilizations of 65{\%} and 80{\%}, respectively, there is a 16{\%} chance that they have the same average adjusted utilization. Average OR utilization can be estimated more precisely for surgeons performing more cases each week. Conclusions: Average OR utilization probably cannot be estimated precisely for low-volume surgeons based on 3 months or 1 yr of historical OR utilization data. The authors recommend that at surgical suites trying to allocate OR time to individual low-volume surgeons, OR allocations be based on criteria other than only OR utilization (e.g., based on OR efficiency).",
author = "Franklin Dexter and Alex Macario and Traub, {Rodney D.} and David Lubarsky",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00000542-200305000-00029",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "1243--1249",
journal = "Anesthesiology",
issn = "0003-3022",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Operating room utilization alone is not an accurate metric for the allocation of operating room block time to individual surgeons with low caseloads

AU - Dexter, Franklin

AU - Macario, Alex

AU - Traub, Rodney D.

AU - Lubarsky, David

PY - 2003/5/1

Y1 - 2003/5/1

N2 - Introduction: Many surgical suites allocate operating room (OR) block time to individual surgeons. If block time is allocated to services/groups and yet the same surgeon invariably operates on the same weekday, for all practical purposes block time is being allocated to individual surgeons. Organizational conflict occurs when a surgeon with a relatively low OR utilization has his or her allocated block time reduced. The authors studied potential limitations affecting whether a facility can accurately estimate the average block time utilizations of individual surgeons performing low volumes of cases. Methods: Discrete-event computer simulation. Results: Neither 3 months nor 1 yr of historical data were enough to be able to identify surgeons who had persistently low average OR utilizations. For example, with 3 months of data, the widths of the 95% CIs for average OR utilization exceeded 10% for surgeons who had average raw utilizations of 83% or less. If during a 3-month period a surgeon's measured adjusted utilization is 65%, there is a 95% chance that the surgeon's average adjusted utilization is as low as 38% or as high as 83%. If two surgeons have measured adjusted utilizations of 65% and 80%, respectively, there is a 16% chance that they have the same average adjusted utilization. Average OR utilization can be estimated more precisely for surgeons performing more cases each week. Conclusions: Average OR utilization probably cannot be estimated precisely for low-volume surgeons based on 3 months or 1 yr of historical OR utilization data. The authors recommend that at surgical suites trying to allocate OR time to individual low-volume surgeons, OR allocations be based on criteria other than only OR utilization (e.g., based on OR efficiency).

AB - Introduction: Many surgical suites allocate operating room (OR) block time to individual surgeons. If block time is allocated to services/groups and yet the same surgeon invariably operates on the same weekday, for all practical purposes block time is being allocated to individual surgeons. Organizational conflict occurs when a surgeon with a relatively low OR utilization has his or her allocated block time reduced. The authors studied potential limitations affecting whether a facility can accurately estimate the average block time utilizations of individual surgeons performing low volumes of cases. Methods: Discrete-event computer simulation. Results: Neither 3 months nor 1 yr of historical data were enough to be able to identify surgeons who had persistently low average OR utilizations. For example, with 3 months of data, the widths of the 95% CIs for average OR utilization exceeded 10% for surgeons who had average raw utilizations of 83% or less. If during a 3-month period a surgeon's measured adjusted utilization is 65%, there is a 95% chance that the surgeon's average adjusted utilization is as low as 38% or as high as 83%. If two surgeons have measured adjusted utilizations of 65% and 80%, respectively, there is a 16% chance that they have the same average adjusted utilization. Average OR utilization can be estimated more precisely for surgeons performing more cases each week. Conclusions: Average OR utilization probably cannot be estimated precisely for low-volume surgeons based on 3 months or 1 yr of historical OR utilization data. The authors recommend that at surgical suites trying to allocate OR time to individual low-volume surgeons, OR allocations be based on criteria other than only OR utilization (e.g., based on OR efficiency).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037408367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037408367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00029

DO - 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00029

M3 - Article

VL - 98

SP - 1243

EP - 1249

JO - Anesthesiology

JF - Anesthesiology

SN - 0003-3022

IS - 5

ER -