Open and closed seascapes

Where does habitat patchiness create populations with high fractions of self-recruitment?

Malin L. Pinsky, Stephen R. Palumbi, Serge Andréfouët, Sam Purkis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Which populations are replenished primarily by immigrants (open) and which by local production (closed) remains an important question for management with implications for response to exploitation, protection, and disturbance. However, we lack methods for predicting population openness. Here, we develop a model for openness and show that considering habitat isolation explains the existence of surprisingly closed populations in highdispersal species, including many marine organisms. Relatively closed populations are expected when patch spacing is more than twice the standard deviation of a species' dispersal kernel. In addition, natural scales of habitat patchiness on coral reefs are sufficient to create both largely open and largely closed populations. Contrary to some previous interpretations, largely closed marine populations do not require mean dispersal distances that are unusually short, even for species with relatively long pelagic larval durations. We predict that habitat patchiness has strong control over population openness for many marine and terrestrial species with a highly dispersive life stage and relatively sedentary adults. This information can be used to make initial predictions about where populations will be more or less resilient to local exploitation and disturbance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1257-1267
Number of pages11
JournalEcological Applications
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

patchiness
habitat
disturbance
coral reef
spacing
prediction

Keywords

  • Connectivity
  • Coral reef seascapes
  • Dispersal
  • Landscape ecology
  • Marine protected areas
  • Metapopulation
  • Population openness
  • Reef fishes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Open and closed seascapes : Where does habitat patchiness create populations with high fractions of self-recruitment? / Pinsky, Malin L.; Palumbi, Stephen R.; Andréfouët, Serge; Purkis, Sam.

In: Ecological Applications, Vol. 22, No. 4, 01.06.2012, p. 1257-1267.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pinsky, Malin L. ; Palumbi, Stephen R. ; Andréfouët, Serge ; Purkis, Sam. / Open and closed seascapes : Where does habitat patchiness create populations with high fractions of self-recruitment?. In: Ecological Applications. 2012 ; Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 1257-1267.
@article{6f326dc1b90b4c4b98c20330699cd3c1,
title = "Open and closed seascapes: Where does habitat patchiness create populations with high fractions of self-recruitment?",
abstract = "Which populations are replenished primarily by immigrants (open) and which by local production (closed) remains an important question for management with implications for response to exploitation, protection, and disturbance. However, we lack methods for predicting population openness. Here, we develop a model for openness and show that considering habitat isolation explains the existence of surprisingly closed populations in highdispersal species, including many marine organisms. Relatively closed populations are expected when patch spacing is more than twice the standard deviation of a species' dispersal kernel. In addition, natural scales of habitat patchiness on coral reefs are sufficient to create both largely open and largely closed populations. Contrary to some previous interpretations, largely closed marine populations do not require mean dispersal distances that are unusually short, even for species with relatively long pelagic larval durations. We predict that habitat patchiness has strong control over population openness for many marine and terrestrial species with a highly dispersive life stage and relatively sedentary adults. This information can be used to make initial predictions about where populations will be more or less resilient to local exploitation and disturbance.",
keywords = "Connectivity, Coral reef seascapes, Dispersal, Landscape ecology, Marine protected areas, Metapopulation, Population openness, Reef fishes",
author = "Pinsky, {Malin L.} and Palumbi, {Stephen R.} and Serge Andr{\'e}fou{\"e}t and Sam Purkis",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1890/11-1240.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1257--1267",
journal = "Ecological Appplications",
issn = "1051-0761",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open and closed seascapes

T2 - Where does habitat patchiness create populations with high fractions of self-recruitment?

AU - Pinsky, Malin L.

AU - Palumbi, Stephen R.

AU - Andréfouët, Serge

AU - Purkis, Sam

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - Which populations are replenished primarily by immigrants (open) and which by local production (closed) remains an important question for management with implications for response to exploitation, protection, and disturbance. However, we lack methods for predicting population openness. Here, we develop a model for openness and show that considering habitat isolation explains the existence of surprisingly closed populations in highdispersal species, including many marine organisms. Relatively closed populations are expected when patch spacing is more than twice the standard deviation of a species' dispersal kernel. In addition, natural scales of habitat patchiness on coral reefs are sufficient to create both largely open and largely closed populations. Contrary to some previous interpretations, largely closed marine populations do not require mean dispersal distances that are unusually short, even for species with relatively long pelagic larval durations. We predict that habitat patchiness has strong control over population openness for many marine and terrestrial species with a highly dispersive life stage and relatively sedentary adults. This information can be used to make initial predictions about where populations will be more or less resilient to local exploitation and disturbance.

AB - Which populations are replenished primarily by immigrants (open) and which by local production (closed) remains an important question for management with implications for response to exploitation, protection, and disturbance. However, we lack methods for predicting population openness. Here, we develop a model for openness and show that considering habitat isolation explains the existence of surprisingly closed populations in highdispersal species, including many marine organisms. Relatively closed populations are expected when patch spacing is more than twice the standard deviation of a species' dispersal kernel. In addition, natural scales of habitat patchiness on coral reefs are sufficient to create both largely open and largely closed populations. Contrary to some previous interpretations, largely closed marine populations do not require mean dispersal distances that are unusually short, even for species with relatively long pelagic larval durations. We predict that habitat patchiness has strong control over population openness for many marine and terrestrial species with a highly dispersive life stage and relatively sedentary adults. This information can be used to make initial predictions about where populations will be more or less resilient to local exploitation and disturbance.

KW - Connectivity

KW - Coral reef seascapes

KW - Dispersal

KW - Landscape ecology

KW - Marine protected areas

KW - Metapopulation

KW - Population openness

KW - Reef fishes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861941847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861941847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1890/11-1240.1

DO - 10.1890/11-1240.1

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 1257

EP - 1267

JO - Ecological Appplications

JF - Ecological Appplications

SN - 1051-0761

IS - 4

ER -