On what it takes for there to be no fact of the matter

Jody Azzouni, Otavio Bueno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Philosophers are very fond of making non-factualist claims - claims to the effect that there is no fact of the matter as to whether something is the case. But can these claims be coherently stated in the context of classical logic? Some care is needed here, we argue, otherwise one ends up denying a tautology or embracing a contradiction. In the end, we think there are only two strategies available to someone who wants to be a non-factualist about something, and remain within the province of classical logic. But one of these strategies is rather controversial, and the other requires substantially more work than is often supposed. Being a non-factualist is no easy business, and it may not be the most philosophically perspicuous way to go.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)753-769
Number of pages17
JournalNous
Volume42
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Classical Logic
Philosopher
Tautology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

On what it takes for there to be no fact of the matter. / Azzouni, Jody; Bueno, Otavio.

In: Nous, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2008, p. 753-769.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Azzouni, J & Bueno, O 2008, 'On what it takes for there to be no fact of the matter', Nous, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 753-769.
Azzouni, Jody ; Bueno, Otavio. / On what it takes for there to be no fact of the matter. In: Nous. 2008 ; Vol. 42, No. 4. pp. 753-769.
@article{98a2e6236b13486ba313a58390e088a3,
title = "On what it takes for there to be no fact of the matter",
abstract = "Philosophers are very fond of making non-factualist claims - claims to the effect that there is no fact of the matter as to whether something is the case. But can these claims be coherently stated in the context of classical logic? Some care is needed here, we argue, otherwise one ends up denying a tautology or embracing a contradiction. In the end, we think there are only two strategies available to someone who wants to be a non-factualist about something, and remain within the province of classical logic. But one of these strategies is rather controversial, and the other requires substantially more work than is often supposed. Being a non-factualist is no easy business, and it may not be the most philosophically perspicuous way to go.",
author = "Jody Azzouni and Otavio Bueno",
year = "2008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "753--769",
journal = "Nous",
issn = "0029-4624",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On what it takes for there to be no fact of the matter

AU - Azzouni, Jody

AU - Bueno, Otavio

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Philosophers are very fond of making non-factualist claims - claims to the effect that there is no fact of the matter as to whether something is the case. But can these claims be coherently stated in the context of classical logic? Some care is needed here, we argue, otherwise one ends up denying a tautology or embracing a contradiction. In the end, we think there are only two strategies available to someone who wants to be a non-factualist about something, and remain within the province of classical logic. But one of these strategies is rather controversial, and the other requires substantially more work than is often supposed. Being a non-factualist is no easy business, and it may not be the most philosophically perspicuous way to go.

AB - Philosophers are very fond of making non-factualist claims - claims to the effect that there is no fact of the matter as to whether something is the case. But can these claims be coherently stated in the context of classical logic? Some care is needed here, we argue, otherwise one ends up denying a tautology or embracing a contradiction. In the end, we think there are only two strategies available to someone who wants to be a non-factualist about something, and remain within the province of classical logic. But one of these strategies is rather controversial, and the other requires substantially more work than is often supposed. Being a non-factualist is no easy business, and it may not be the most philosophically perspicuous way to go.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60949358879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60949358879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:60949358879

VL - 42

SP - 753

EP - 769

JO - Nous

JF - Nous

SN - 0029-4624

IS - 4

ER -