On the use of cloud forcing to estimate cloud feedback

Brian J Soden, Anthony J. Broccoli, Richard S. Hemler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

163 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Uncertainty in cloud feedback is the leading cause of discrepancy in model predictions of climate change. The use of observed or model-simulated radiative fluxes to diagnose the effect of clouds on climate sensitivity requires an accurate understanding of the distinction between a change in cloud radiative forcing and a cloud feedback. This study compares simulations from different versions of the GFDL Atmospheric Model 2 (AM2) that have widely varying strengths of cloud feedback to illustrate the differences between the two and highlight the potential for changes in cloud radiative forcing to be misinterpreted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3661-3665
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Climate
Volume17
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

cloud radiative forcing
climate change
climate
prediction
simulation
atmospheric model
effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

On the use of cloud forcing to estimate cloud feedback. / Soden, Brian J; Broccoli, Anthony J.; Hemler, Richard S.

In: Journal of Climate, Vol. 17, No. 19, 01.10.2004, p. 3661-3665.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Soden, Brian J ; Broccoli, Anthony J. ; Hemler, Richard S. / On the use of cloud forcing to estimate cloud feedback. In: Journal of Climate. 2004 ; Vol. 17, No. 19. pp. 3661-3665.
@article{e3b798bcd5654a55b1ea34cbec040fed,
title = "On the use of cloud forcing to estimate cloud feedback",
abstract = "Uncertainty in cloud feedback is the leading cause of discrepancy in model predictions of climate change. The use of observed or model-simulated radiative fluxes to diagnose the effect of clouds on climate sensitivity requires an accurate understanding of the distinction between a change in cloud radiative forcing and a cloud feedback. This study compares simulations from different versions of the GFDL Atmospheric Model 2 (AM2) that have widely varying strengths of cloud feedback to illustrate the differences between the two and highlight the potential for changes in cloud radiative forcing to be misinterpreted.",
author = "Soden, {Brian J} and Broccoli, {Anthony J.} and Hemler, {Richard S.}",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<3661:OTUOCF>2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "3661--3665",
journal = "Journal of Climate",
issn = "0894-8755",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the use of cloud forcing to estimate cloud feedback

AU - Soden, Brian J

AU - Broccoli, Anthony J.

AU - Hemler, Richard S.

PY - 2004/10/1

Y1 - 2004/10/1

N2 - Uncertainty in cloud feedback is the leading cause of discrepancy in model predictions of climate change. The use of observed or model-simulated radiative fluxes to diagnose the effect of clouds on climate sensitivity requires an accurate understanding of the distinction between a change in cloud radiative forcing and a cloud feedback. This study compares simulations from different versions of the GFDL Atmospheric Model 2 (AM2) that have widely varying strengths of cloud feedback to illustrate the differences between the two and highlight the potential for changes in cloud radiative forcing to be misinterpreted.

AB - Uncertainty in cloud feedback is the leading cause of discrepancy in model predictions of climate change. The use of observed or model-simulated radiative fluxes to diagnose the effect of clouds on climate sensitivity requires an accurate understanding of the distinction between a change in cloud radiative forcing and a cloud feedback. This study compares simulations from different versions of the GFDL Atmospheric Model 2 (AM2) that have widely varying strengths of cloud feedback to illustrate the differences between the two and highlight the potential for changes in cloud radiative forcing to be misinterpreted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=6044251401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=6044251401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<3661:OTUOCF>2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<3661:OTUOCF>2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 3661

EP - 3665

JO - Journal of Climate

JF - Journal of Climate

SN - 0894-8755

IS - 19

ER -